Dataset Information

Denoising of Diffusion MRI Data via Graph Framelet Matching in x-q Space.

ABSTRACT: Diffusion magnetic resonance imaging (DMRI) suffers from lower signal-to-noise-ratio (SNR) due to MR signal attenuation associated with the motion of water molecules. To improve SNR, the non-local means (NLM) algorithm has demonstrated state-of-the-art performance in noise reduction. However, existing NLM algorithms do not take into account explicitly the fact that DMRI signal can vary significantly with local fiber orientations. Applying NLM naïvely can hence blur subtle structures and aggravate partial volume effects. To overcome this limitation, we improve NLM by performing neighborhood matching in non-flat domains and removing noise with information from both x -space (spatial domain) and q -space (wavevector domain). Specifically, we first encode the q -space sampling domain using a graph. We then perform graph framelet transforms to extract robust rotation-invariant features for each sampling point in x-q space. The resulting features are employed for robust neighborhood matching to locate recurrent information. Finally, we remove noise via an NLM framework. To adapt to the various types of noise in multi-coil MR imaging, we transform the signal before denoising so that it is Gaussian-distributed, allowing noise removal to be carried out in an unbiased manner. Our method is able to more effectively locate recurrent information in white matter structures with different orientations, avoiding the blurring effects caused by naïvely applying NLM. Experiments on synthetic, repetitively-acquired, and infant DMRI data demonstrate that our method is able to preserve subtle structures while effectively removing noise.

SUBMITTER: Chen G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8325050 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundAutomated segmentation of spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a vital role both scientifically and clinically. However, accurately delineating posterior spine structures is challenging.MethodsThis retrospective study, approved by the ethical committee, involved translating T1-weighted and T2-weighted images into computed tomography (CT) images in a total of 263 pairs of CT/MR series. Landmark-based registration was performed to align image pairs. We compared two-dimensional (2D) paired - Pix2Pix, denoising diffusion implicit models (DDIM) image mode, DDIM noise mode - and unpaired (SynDiff, contrastive unpaired translation) image-to-image translation using "peak signal-to-noise ratio" as quality measure. A publicly available segmentation network segmented the synthesized CT datasets, and Dice similarity coefficients (DSC) were evaluated on in-house test sets and the "MRSpineSeg Challenge" volumes. The 2D findings were extended to three-dimensional (3D) Pix2Pix and DDIM.Results2D paired methods and SynDiff exhibited similar translation performance and DCS on paired data. DDIM image mode achieved the highest image quality. SynDiff, Pix2Pix, and DDIM image mode demonstrated similar DSC (0.77). For craniocaudal axis rotations, at least two landmarks per vertebra were required for registration. The 3D translation outperformed the 2D approach, resulting in improved DSC (0.80) and anatomically accurate segmentations with higher spatial resolution than that of the original MRI series.ConclusionsTwo landmarks per vertebra registration enabled paired image-to-image translation from MRI to CT and outperformed all unpaired approaches. The 3D techniques provided anatomically correct segmentations, avoiding underprediction of small structures like the spinous process.Relevance statementThis study addresses the unresolved issue of translating spinal MRI to CT, making CT-based tools usable for MRI data. It generates whole spine segmentation, previously unavailable in MRI, a prerequisite for biomechanical modeling and feature extraction for clinical applications.Key points• Unpaired image translation lacks in converting spine MRI to CT effectively. • Paired translation needs registration with two landmarks per vertebra at least. • Paired image-to-image enables segmentation transfer to other domains. • 3D translation enables super resolution from MRI to CT. • 3D translation prevents underprediction of small structures.

Project description:BackgroundMulti-b-valued/multi-shell diffusion provides potentially valuable metrics in breast MRI but suffers from low signal-to-noise ratio and has potentially long scan times.PurposeTo investigate the effects of model-based denoising with no loss of spatial resolution on multi-shell breast diffusion MRI; to determine the effects of downsampling on multi-shell diffusion; and to quantify these effects in multi-b-valued (three directions per b-value) acquisitions.Study typeProspective ("fully-sampled" multi-shell) and retrospective longitudinal (multi-b).SubjectsOne normal subject (multi-shell) and 10 breast cancer subjects imaging at four timepoints (multi-b).Field strength/sequence3T multi-shell acquisition and 1.5T multi-b acquisition.AssessmentThe "fully-sampled" multi-shell acquisition was retrospectively downsampled to determine the bias and error from downsampling. Mean, axial/parallel, radial diffusivity, and fractional anisotropy (FA) were analyzed. Denoising was applied retrospectively to the multi-b-valued breast cancer subject dataset and assessed subjectively for image noise level and tumor conspicuity.Statistical testsParametric paired t-test (P < 0.05 considered statistically significant) on mean and coefficient of variation of each metric-the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from all b-values, fast ADC, slow ADC, and perfusion fraction. Paired and two-sample t-tests for each metric comparing normal and tumor tissue.ResultsIn the multi-shell data, denoising effectively suppressed FA (-45% to -78%), with small biases in mean diffusivity (-5% in normal, +23% in tumor, and -4% in vascular compartments). In the multi-b data, denoising resulted in small biases to the ADC metrics in tumor and normal contralateral tissue (by -3% to +11%), but greatly reduced the coefficient of variation for every metric (by -1% to -24%). Denoising improved differentiation of tumor and normal tissue regions in most metrics and timepoints; subjectively, image noise level and tumor conspicuity were improved in the fast ADC maps.Data conclusionModel-based denoising effectively suppressed erroneously high FA and improved the accuracy of diffusivity metrics.Evidence level3 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 1.

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the feasibility of accelerating prostate diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) by reducing the number of acquired averages and denoising the resulting image using a proposed guided denoising convolutional neural network (DnCNN).Materials and methodsRaw data from the prostate DWI scans were retrospectively gathered between July 2018 and July 2019 from six single-vendor MRI scanners. There were 103 datasets used for training (median age, 64 years; interquartile range [IQR], 11), 15 for validation (median age, 68 years; IQR, 12), and 37 for testing (median age, 64 years; IQR, 12). High b-value diffusion-weighted (hb DW) data were reconstructed into noisy images using two averages and reference images using all 16 averages. A conventional DnCNN was modified into a guided DnCNN, which uses the low b-value DW image as a guidance input. Quantitative and qualitative reader evaluations were performed on the denoised hb DW images. A cumulative link mixed regression model was used to compare the readers' scores. The agreement between the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps (denoised vs reference) was analyzed using Bland-Altman analysis.ResultsCompared with the original DnCNN, the guided DnCNN produced denoised hb DW images with higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (32.79 ± 3.64 [standard deviation] vs 33.74 ± 3.64), higher structural similarity index (0.92 ± 0.05 vs 0.93 ± 0.04), and lower normalized mean square error (3.9% ± 10 vs 1.6% ± 1.5) (P < .001 for all). Compared with the reference images, the denoised images received higher image quality scores from the readers (P < .0001). The ADC values based on the denoised hb DW images were in good agreement with the reference ADC values (mean ADC difference ranged from -0.04 to 0.02 × 10-3 mm2/sec).ConclusionAccelerating prostate DWI by reducing the number of acquired averages and denoising the resulting image using the proposed guided DnCNN is technically feasible. Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2020.

Dataset Information

Denoising of Diffusion MRI Data via Graph Framelet Matching in x-q Space.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets