Dataset Information

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in elderly women with ovarian cancer: Rates of use and effectiveness.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) may reduce perioperative morbidity in women undergoing primary treatment for ovarian cancer. We evaluated patterns of use and outcomes in a population-based cohort of elderly women with ovarian cancer (OC).

Methods

A cohort of patients ≥66 years old diagnosed between 2000 and 2013 with stage III-IV epithelial OC who received surgery and platinum/taxane chemotherapy for primary treatment was identified from the SEER-Medicare database. Propensity-score matching methods were used to examine differences in outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare overall survival (OS) in the matched cohort.

Results

From 2000 to 2013, 22.5% of older women received NACT. The use of NACT increased over time from 16% in 2000 to 35.4% in 2013 (p < .0001). Among women who received PCS, the rate of ostomy creation was higher compared with NACT (23.3% vs. 10.8%, p < .0001). Infectious and other surgical complications were higher among those who had PCS, regardless of stage. Median OS of women III ovarian cancer who underwent PCS was longer compared with NACT (38.8 vs. 28 months, p ≤ .0001). There were no survival differences between NACT and PCS in women with stage IV disease (29.4 vs. 29.8 months, p = .61) or for women aged >80.

Conclusion

Careful consideration should be given to older patients prior to undergoing PCS. Survival outcomes were similar for patients with stage IV disease, although NACT was associated with decreased perioperative morbidity compared with PCS. Among women with stage III disease, PCS was associated with improved overall survival, but higher rates of perioperative morbidity and acute care.

SUBMITTER: Meyer LA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8328050 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:The growing use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy to treat advanced stage high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) creates an opportunity to better understand chemotherapy-induced mutational and gene expression changes. Here we performed a cohort study including 34 patients with advanced stage IIIC or IV HGSOC to assess changes in the tumor genome and transcriptome in women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. RNA sequencing and panel DNA sequencing of 596 cancer-related genes was performed on paired formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens collected before and after chemotherapy, and differentially expressed genes (DEG) and copy-number variations (CNV) in pre- and post-chemotherapy samples were identified. Following tissue and sequencing quality control, the final patient cohort consisted of 32 paired DNA and 20 paired RNA samples. Genomic analysis of paired samples did not reveal any recurrent chemotherapy-induced mutations. Gene expression analyses found that most DEGs were upregulated by chemotherapy, primarily in the chemotherapy-resistant specimens. AP-1 transcription factor family genes (FOS, FOSB, FRA-1) were particularly upregulated in chemotherapy-resistant samples. CNV analysis identified recurrent 11q23.1 amplification, which encompasses SIK2. In vitro, combined treatment with AP-1 or SIK2 inhibitors with carboplatin or paclitaxel demonstrated synergistic effects. These data suggest that AP-1 activity and SIK2 copy-number amplification are induced by chemotherapy and may represent mechanisms by which chemotherapy resistance evolves in HGSOC. AP-1 and SIK2 are druggable targets with available small molecule inhibitors and represent potential targets to circumvent chemotherapy resistance. SIGNIFICANCE: Genomic and transcriptomic analyses identify increased AP-1 activity and SIK2 copy-number amplifications in resistant ovarian cancer following neoadjuvant chemotherapy, uncovering synergistic effects of AP-1 and SIK2 inhibitors with chemotherapy.

Project description:Importance:Uncertainty remains about the relative benefits of primary cytoreductive surgery (PCS) vs neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) for advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). Objective:To compare overall survival of PCS vs NACT in a large national population of women with advanced-stage EOC. Design, Setting, and Participants:Retrospective cohort study of women with stage IIIC and IV EOC diagnosed between 2003 and 2011 treated at hospitals across the United States reporting to the National Cancer Data Base. We focused on patients 70 years or younger with a Charlson comorbidity index of 0 who were likely candidates for either treatment. Exposures:Initial treatment approach of PCS vs NACT, examined using an intent-to-treat analysis. Main Outcomes and Measures:Overall survival, defined as months from cancer diagnosis to death or date of the last contact. We used propensity score matching to compare similar women who underwent PCS and NACT. The association of treatment approach with overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the log-rank test. We assessed whether the findings were influenced by differences in the prevalence of an unobserved confounder, such as limited performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 1-2), preoperative disease burden, and BRCA status. Results:Among 22?962 patients (mean [SD] age, 56.12 [9.38] years), 19?836 (86.4%) received PCS and 3126 (13.6%) underwent NACT. We matched 2935 patients treated with NACT with similar patients who received PCS. The median follow-up was 56.5 (95% CI, 54.5-59.2) months in the PCS group and 56.3 (95% CI, 54.5-59.8) months in the NACT group in the propensity-matched cohort. Among propensity score-matched groups, the median overall survival was 37.3 (95% CI, 35.2-38.7) months in the PCS group and 32.1 (95% CI, 30.8-34.1) months in the NACT group (P?<?.001). However, if the NACT group had a higher proportion of women with performance statuses of 1 to 2 compared with those who underwent PCS (60% vs 50%), the association of PCS and improved survival would not be statistically significant. Conclusions and Relevance:Primary cytoreductive surgery was associated with improved survival compared with NACT in otherwise healthy women with advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancer aged 70 years or younger. The lower survival in women who received NACT could be explained by a higher prevalence of limited performance status in women undergoing NACT.