Dataset Information

Impact of Letermovir Use for Cytomegalovirus Prophylaxis on Re-Hospitalization Following Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation: An Analysis of a Phase III Randomized Clinical Trial.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is associated with substantial healthcare resource use, particularly when recipients develop cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. Letermovir reduced post-HSCT CMV infection risk compared with placebo in a previous phase III trial. This analysis evaluated letermovir's impact on re-hospitalization post-transplant.

Methods

Using data from a phase III, multicenter, randomized clinical trial (NCT02137772, registered May 14, 2014), this study assessed CMV-associated and all-cause re-hospitalizations at weeks 14, 24, and 48 post-transplant among recipients of letermovir versus placebo. Unstandardized re-hospitalization rates and days were reported; standardized rates and days were estimated accounting for censoring due to death or early study discontinuation.

Results

Unstandardized rates (95% confidence interval [CI]) of all-cause re-hospitalization in letermovir versus placebo recipients at weeks 14, 24, and 48 were 36.6% (31.4-42.1) versus 47.6% (39.9-55.4), 49.2% (43.7-54.8) versus 55.9% (48.1-63.5), and 55.7% (50.1-61.2) versus 60.6% (52.8-68.0), respectively. Unstandardized mean total duration (95% CI) of re-hospitalization with letermovir versus placebo at weeks 14, 24, and 48 were 7.6 (5.9-9.8) versus 11.3 (8.6-14.8), 13.9 (11.2-17.2) versus 15.5 (11.9-20.1), and 18.0 (14.8-21.9) versus 20.7 (15.8-27.1) days, respectively. Similar results were found in CMV-associated re-hospitalization outcomes and standardized rates and days of all-cause re-hospitalizations.

Conclusions

In this post-hoc analysis, letermovir was associated with lower rates of CMV-associated and all-cause re-hospitalizations with a shorter length of stay (especially within the first 14 weeks post-transplant).

SUBMITTER: Golan Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8333192 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is major cause of morbidity and mortality following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Ixazomib is an oral, second-generation, proteasome inhibitor that has been shown in preclinical models to prevent GVHD. We conducted a phase I/II trial in 57 patients to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ixazomib administration for cGVHD prophylaxis in patients undergoing allogeneic HCT. Oral ixazomib was administered on a weekly basis for a total of 4 doses, beginning days +60 through +90, to recipients of matched related donor (MRD, n = 25) or matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 26) allogeneic HCT in phase II portion of the study, once the recommended phase II dose of 4 mg was identified in phase I (n = 6). All patients received peripheral blood graft and standard GVHD prophylaxis of tacrolimus and methotrexate. Ixazomib administration was safe and well tolerated, with thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, gastrointestinal complaints, and fatigue the most common adverse events (>10%). In phase II (n = 51), the cumulative incidence of cGVHD at 1 year was 36% (95% confidence interval [CI], 19% to 54%) in the MRD cohort and 39% (95% CI, 21% to 56%) in the MUD cohort. One-year cumulative incidence of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and relapse was 0% and 20% (95% CI, 8% to 36%) in the MRD cohort, respectively. In the MUD cohort, the respective NRM and relapse rates were 4% (0% to 16%) and 34% (17% to 52%). The outcomes on the study were compared post hoc with contemporaneous matched Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) controls. This post hoc analysis showed no significant improvement in cGVHD rates in both the MRD (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.85, P = .64) or MUD cohorts (HR = 0.68, P = .26) on the study compared with CIBMTR controls. B cell activating factor plasma levels were significantly higher after ixazomib dosing in those who remained cGVHD free compared with those developed cGVHD. This study shows that the novel strategy of short-course oral ixazomib following allogeneic HCT is safe but did not demonstrate significant improvement in cGVHD incidence in recipients of MRD and MUD transplantation compared with matched CIBMTR controls. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02250300.

Project description:BACKGROUND: Based on sequence variation in the UL55 gene that encodes glycoprotein B (gB), human cytomegalovirus (CMV) can be classified into four gB genotypes. Previous studies have suggested an association between CMV gB genotype and clinical outcome in patients who underwent an allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT). The goals of this study were identify patients with active infection caused by CMV in recipients of HSCT; determine the prevalence of CMV genotypes in the study group; correlate genotype with CMV disease, acute GVHD and overall survival. METHODS: The diagnosis of active CMV infection after allogeneic HSCT was detected by antigenemia (AGM) and/or nested-PCR (N-PCR). Positive samples from patients with active CMV infection were submitted to genotyping using N-PCR to amplify a region of UL55, followed by restriction analysis based on HinfI and RsaI digestion. Real-time PCR (qPCR) was used to determine the viral load during active CMV infection and antiviral treatment. RESULTS: Sixty-three allogeneic HSCT recipients were prospectively evaluated; 49/63 (78%) patients were infected with CMV genotypes - gB1 19/49 (39%), gB2 17/49 (35%), gB3 3/49 (6%), gB4 7/49 (14%) - and 3 (6%) had mixed CMV genotypes (gB1 + gB3, gB1 + gB4 and gB2 + gB4). Characterized by gastrointestinal disease, CMV disease occurred in 3/49 (6.1%) patients, who had CMV gB3 genotype. These gB3 genotype patients presented an increasing AGM number, mean 125 (± 250) (P = 0.70), and qPCR copies/ml, mean 37938 (SD ± 50542) (P = 0.03), during antiviral treatment, when compared with other CMV genotypes. According to CMV genotypes, stratified overall survival was 55% for gB1, 43% for gB2; 0% for gB3 and 57% for gB4 (P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: One of the restrictions of the presented study was the low number of CMV gB sub-cohorts). However, we demonstrated that the frequency of active CMV infection in this HSCT population was high, and the most prevalent genotype in these patients with active CMV infection was gB1 and gB2 genotype (74%). In Brazil, HSCT recipients seem to carry mainly gB1 and gB2 CMV genotype.

Project description:Abstract Background LET prophylaxis through HCT Week 14 was highly effective in preventing clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi), had a good safety profile, and was associated with lower all-cause mortality by HCT Week 24 compared with placebo (PBO). Patients with detectable CMV DNA at randomization were excluded from the trial’s efficacy analyses (NCT02137772). Here we report the outcomes of these patients. Methods We compared patients randomized 2:1 and treated with LET or PBO who had detectable CMV DNA at randomization (n = 70) to those with undetectable CMV DNA (n = 495; primary efficacy population, PEP). CS-CMVi was defined as CMV viremia requiring antiviral preemptive therapy (PET) or CMV disease; patients with missing data were imputed as events. PET was prescribed blinded to study drug. We analyzed CS-CMVi incidence, CMV viral load (VL) kinetics, and mortality using post study vital status. Detectable, nonquantifiable CMV VL (<151 c/mL) was imputed as 150 c/mL. Results Of 70 patients with detectable CMV DNA at randomization (48 LET, 22 PBO), CMV VL was 150 c/mL in 63 patients (range, 150–716). All patients had undetectable CMV VL ?5 days before randomization. Baseline characteristics were similar to the PEP, except for more patients with myeloablative conditioning (62.9% vs. 48.3%) and longer median days post-HCT to start of study drug (15 days vs. 8 days). Median study drug exposure was 70 days (range, 1–113) in LET group and 14 days (range, 7–99) in PBO group. By HCT Week 14, CS-CMVi occurred in 15 (31.3%) LET-treated patients and 17 (77.3%) PBO patients; CS-CMVi with imputed events were 22 (45.8%) in LET group and 20 (90.9%) in PBO group (difference –44.8%; 95% CI, –64.7% to –24.8%; P < 0.0001). Median CMV VL at time of PET was 413 c/mL (range, 150–31,847) and was similar between groups. Eight patients had quantifiable CMV VL (range, 171–1,728 c/mL) 1 week after starting study drug: 6 did not receive PET (5 LET [10.4%], 1 PBO [4.5%]). CMV VL was undetectable subsequently; other 2 withdrew from study. One (2.1%) LET-treated patient developed breakthrough CMV viremia with a UL56 C325W mutation. HCT Week 48 all-cause mortality was 26.5% in LET and 40.9% in PBO (figure). Conclusion LET prevented CS-CMVi compared with PBO among patients with detectable CMV DNA at randomization. Disclosures F. M. Marty, Merck: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee, Research support and Speaker honorarium. Astellas: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Chimerix: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Fate Therapeutics: Consultant, Consulting fee. GlaxoSmithKline: Consultant, Consulting fee. LFB: Consultant, Consulting fee. Roche Molecular Diagnostics: Consultant, Consulting fee. Shire: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Cidara: Investigator, Research support. Ansun: Investigator, Research support. Gilead: Investigator, Research support. WHISCON: Investigator, Research support. P. Ljungman, Merck: Investigator, Research support. AiCuris: Consultant, Consulting fee. Astellas: Investigator, Research support. Oxford Immunotec: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. R. F. Chemaly, Merck: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Chimerix: Consultant and Investigator, Consulting fee and Research support. Astellas: Consultant, Consulting fee. Novartis: Investigator, Research support. Oxford Immunotec: Consultant, Consulting fee. H. Wan, Merck: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. V. L. Teal, Merck: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. J. Butterton, Merck: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. W. W. Yeh, Merck: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. R. Y. Leavitt, Merck: Employee and Shareholder, Salary. C. Badshah, Merck: Employee and Shareholder, Salary.