Dataset Information

A contrast-enhanced-CT-based classification tree model for classifying malignancy of solid lung tumors in a Chinese clinical population.

ABSTRACT:

Background

To develop and validate a contrast-enhanced CT based classification tree model for classifying solid lung tumors in clinical patients into malignant or benign.

Methods

Between January 2015 and October 2017, 827 pathologically confirmed solid lung tumors (487 malignant, 340 benign; median size, 27.0 mm, IQR 18.0-39.0 mm) from 827 patients from a dedicated Chinese cancer hospital were identified. Nodules were divided randomly into two groups, a training group (575 cases) and a testing group (252 cases). CT characteristics were collected by two radiologists, and analyzed using a classification and regression tree (CART) model. For validation, we used the decision analysis threshold to evaluate the classification performance of the CART model and radiologist's diagnosis (benign; malignant) in the testing group.

Results

Three out of 19 characteristics [margin (smooth; slightly lobulated/lobulated/spiculated), and shape (round/oval; irregular), subjective enhancement (no/uniform enhancement; heterogeneous enhancement)] were automatically generated by the CART model for classifying solid lung tumors. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and diagnostic accuracy of the CART model is 98.5%, 58.1%, 80.6%, 98.6%, 79.8%, and 90.4%, 54.7%, 82.4% 98.5%, 74.2% for the radiologist's diagnosis by using three-threshold decision analysis.

Conclusions

Tumor margin and shape, and subjective tumor enhancement were the most important CT characteristics in the CART model for classifying solid lung tumors as malignant. The CART model had higher discriminatory power than radiologist's diagnosis. The CART model could help radiologists making recommendations regarding follow-up or surgery in clinical patients with a solid lung tumor.

SUBMITTER: Cui X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8339765 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Jul

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

A contrast-enhanced-CT-based classification tree model for classifying malignancy of solid lung tumors in a Chinese clinical population.

Cui Xiaonan X Heuvelmans Marjolein A MA Sidorenkov Grigory G Zhao Yingru Y Fan Shuxuan S Groen Harry J M HJM Dorrius Monique D MD Oudkerk Matthijs M de Bock Geertruida H GH Vliegenthart Rozemarijn R Ye Zhaoxiang Z

Journal of thoracic disease 20210701 7

<h4>Background</h4>To develop and validate a contrast-enhanced CT based classification tree model for classifying solid lung tumors in clinical patients into malignant or benign.<h4>Methods</h4>Between January 2015 and October 2017, 827 pathologically confirmed solid lung tumors (487 malignant, 340 benign; median size, 27.0 mm, IQR 18.0-39.0 mm) from 827 patients from a dedicated Chinese cancer hospital were identified. Nodules were divided randomly into two groups, a training group (575 cases) ...[more]

PMID: 34422367

Similar Datasets

Project description:To compare the diagnostic performance between plain CT-based model and plain plus contrast CT-based modelin the classification of malignancy for solitary solid pulmonary nodules. Between January 2012 and July 2021, 527 patients with pathologically confirmed solitary solid pulmonary nodules were collected at dual centers with similar CT examinations and scanning parameters. Before surgery, all patients underwent both plain and contrast-enhanced chest CT scans. Two clinical characteristics, fifteen plain CT characteristics, and four enhanced characteristics were used to develop two logistic regression models: model 1 (plain CT only) and model 2 (plain + contrast CT). The diagnostic performance of the two models was assessed separately in the development and external validation cohorts using the AUC. 392 patients from Center A were included in the training cohort (median size, 20.0 [IQR, 15.0-24.0] mm; mean age, 55.8 [SD, 9.9] years; male, 53.3%). 135 patients from Center B were included in the external validation cohort (median size, 20.0 [IQR, 16.0-24.0] mm; mean age, 56.4 [SD, 9.6] years; male, 51.9%). Preoperative patients with 201 malignant (adenocarcinoma, 148 [73.6%]; squamous cell carcinoma, 35 [17.4%]; large cell carcinoma,18 [9.0%]) and 326 benign (pulmonary hamartoma, 118 [36.2%]; sclerosing pneumocytoma, 35 [10.7%]; tuberculosis, 104 [31.9%]; inflammatory pseudonodule, 69 [21.2%]) solitary solid pulmonary nodules were gathered from two independent centers. The mean sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, PPV, NPV, and AUC (95%CI) of model 1 (Plain CT only) were 0.79, 0.78, 0.79, 0.67, 0.87, and 0.88 (95%CI, 0.82-0.93), the model 2 (Plain + Contrast CT) were 0.88, 0.91, 0.90, 0.84, 0.93, 0.93 (95%CI, 0.88-0.98) in external validation cohort, respectively. A logistic regression model based on plain and contrast-enhanced CT characteristics showed exceptional performance in the evaluation of malignancy for solitary solid lung nodules. Utilizing this contrast-enhanced CT model would provide recommendations concerning follow-up or surgical intervention for preoperative patients presenting with solid lung nodules.

Project description:ObjectivesTo evaluate and analyze radiomics models based on non-contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) and different phases of contrast-enhanced CT in predicting Ki-67 proliferation index (PI) among patients with pathologically confirmed gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs).MethodsA total of 383 patients with pathologically proven GIST were divided into a training set (n = 218, vendor 1) and 2 validation sets (n = 96, vendor 2; n = 69, vendors 3-5). Radiomics features extracted from the most recent non-contrast-enhanced and three contrast-enhanced CT scan prior to pathological examination. Random forest models were trained for each phase to predict tumors with high Ki-67 proliferation index (Ki-67>10%) and were evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and other metrics on the validation sets.ResultsOut of 107 radiomics features extracted from each phase of CT images, four were selected for analysis. The model trained using the non-contrast-enhanced phase achieved an AUC of 0.792 in the training set and 0.822 and 0.711 in the two validation sets, similar to models trained on different contrast-enhanced phases (p > 0.05). Several relevant features, including NGTDM Busyness and tumor size, remained predictive in non-contrast-enhanced and different contrast-enhanced images.ConclusionThe results of this study indicate that a radiomics model based on non-contrast-enhanced CT matches that of models based on different phases of contrast-enhanced CT in predicting the Ki-67 PI of GIST. GIST may exhibit similar radiological patterns irrespective of the use of contrast agent, and such radiomics features may help quantify these patterns to predict Ki-67 PI of GISTs.Clinical relevance statementGIST may exhibit similar radiomics patterns irrespective of contrast agent; thus, radiomics models based on non-contrast-enhanced CT could be an alternative for risk stratification in GIST patients with contraindication to contrast agent.Key points• Performance of radiomics models in predicting Ki-67 proliferation based on different CT phases is evaluated. • Non-contrast-enhanced CT-based radiomics models performed similarly to contrast-enhanced CT in risk stratification in GIST patients. • NGTDM Busyness remains stable to contrast agents in GISTs in radiomics models.

Project description:BackgroundMutation screening for gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) is crucial and the c kit gene (KIT) exon 11 mutation is the most common type. This study aimed to explore the associations between GIST with KIT exon 11 mutation and contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images.MethodsPathologically proven GISTs with definitive genotype testing results in our hospital were retrospectively included. Abdominal contrast-enhanced CT images were analyzed. Conventional CT image features and radiomic features were recorded and extracted to build the following models: model [CT], model [radiomic + clinic] and model [CT + radiomic + clinic]. The diagnostic performances of GISTs with KIT exon 11 mutation and KIT exon 11 deletion involving codons 557-558 were evaluated.ResultsIn total, 327 GISTs (255 with KIT exon 11 mutation, and 73 with KIT exon 11 mutation deletion involving codons 557-558) were included. Significant CT features were found for GISTs with KIT exon 11 mutation. The area under curves (AUCs) of the models for KIT exon 11 mutation were 0.7158, 0.7530, and 0.8375 in the training cohort, and 0.6777, 0.7349, and 0.8105 in validation cohort, respectively. The AUCs of the models for KIT exon 11 mutation deletion involving codons 557-558 were 0.7155, 8621, and 0.8691 in the training cohort, and 0.7099, 0.8355, and 0.8488 in the validation cohort, respectively. The model [CT + radiomic + clinic] demonstrated the highest AUCs for prediction of KIT exon 11 mutation and those with deletion involving codons 557-558 (P<0.05), respectively. The model [radiomic + clinic] showed higher diagnostic performance than model [CT] significantly.ConclusionsOur results demonstrated the associations between GIST with KIT exon 11 mutation and contrast-enhanced CT images. We found combing conventional image analysis and texture analysis is a useful tool to distinguish GIST with KIT exon 11 mutation. CT radiogenomics exhibited good application potential in predict the KIT exon 11 mutation of GIST.

Project description:BackgroundDifferentiating benign from malignant renal tumors is important for patient management, and it may be improved by quantitative CT features analysis including radiomic.PurposeThis study aimed to compare performances of machine learning models using bio-clinical, conventional radiologic and 3D-radiomic features for the differentiation of benign and malignant solid renal tumors using pre-operative multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT examinations.Materials and methodsA unicentric retrospective analysis of prospectively acquired data from a national kidney cancer database was conducted between January 2016 and December 2020. Histologic findings were obtained by robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy. Lesion images were semi-automatically segmented, allowing for a 3D-radiomic features extraction in the nephrographic phase. Conventional radiologic parameters such as shape, content and enhancement were combined in the analysis. Biological and clinical features were obtained from the national database. Eight machine learning (ML) models were trained and validated using a ten-fold cross-validation. Predictive performances were evaluated comparing sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and AUC.ResultsA total of 122 patients with 132 renal lesions, including 111 renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) (111/132, 84%) and 21 benign tumors (21/132, 16%), were evaluated (58 +/- 14 years, men 74%). Unilaterality (100/111, 90% vs. 13/21, 62%; p = 0.02), necrosis (81/111, 73% vs. 8/21, 38%; p = 0.02), lower values of tumor/cortex ratio at portal time (0.61 vs. 0.74, p = 0.01) and higher variation of tumor/cortex ratio between arterial and portal times (0.22 vs. 0.05, p = 0.008) were associated with malignancy. A total of 35 radiomics features were selected, and "intensity mean value" was associated with RCCs in multivariate analysis (OR = 0.99). After ten-fold cross-validation, a C5.0Tree model was retained for its predictive performances, yielding a sensitivity of 95%, specificity of 42%, accuracy of 87% and AUC of 0.74.ConclusionOur machine learning-based model combining clinical, radiologic and radiomics features from multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT scans may help differentiate benign from malignant solid renal tumors.

Project description:This work seeks the development and validation of radiomics signatures from nonenhanced computed tomography (CT, NE-RS) to preoperatively predict the malignancy degree of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and the comparison of these signatures with those from contrast-enhanced CT. A dataset for 370 GIST patients was collected from four centers. This dataset was divided into cohorts for training, as well as internal and external validation. The minimum-redundancy maximum-relevance algorithm and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) algorithm were used to filter unstable features. (a) NE-RS and radiomics signature from contrast-enhanced CT (CE-RS) were built and compared for the prediction of malignancy potential of GIST based on the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). (b) The radiomics model was also developed with both the tumor size and NE-RS. The AUC values were comparable between NE-RS and CE-RS in the training (.965 vs .936; P = .251), internal validation (.967 vs .960; P = .801), and external validation (.941 vs .899; P = .173) cohorts in diagnosis of high malignancy potential of GISTs. We next focused on the NE-RS. With 0.185 selected as the cutoff of NE-RS for diagnosis of the malignancy potential of GISTs, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for diagnosis high-malignancy potential GIST was 90.0%, 88.2%, and 92.3%, respectively, in the training cohort. For the internal validation set, the corresponding metrics are 89.1%, 94.9%, and 80.0%, respectively. The corresponding metrics for the external cohort are 84.6%, 76.1%, and 91.0%, respectively. Compared with only NE-RS, the radiomics model increased the sensitivity in the diagnosis of GIST with high-malignancy potential by 5.9% (P = .025), 2.5% (P = .317), 10.5% (P = .008) for the training set, internal validation set, and external validation set, respectively. The NE-RS had comparable prediction efficiency in the diagnosis of high-risk GISTs to CE-RS. The NE-RS and radiomics model both had excellent accuracy in predicting malignancy potential of GISTs.

Project description:ObjectivesTo develop and validate a general radiomics nomogram capable of identifying EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, regardless of patient with either contrast-enhanced CT (CE-CT) or non-contrast-enhanced CT (NE-CT).MethodsA total of 412 NSCLC patients were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Patients' radiomics features not significantly different between NE-CT and CE-CT were defined as general features, and were further used to construct the general radiomics signature. Fivefold cross-validation was used to select the best machine learning algorithm. Finally, a general radiomics nomogram was developed using general radiomics signature, and clinical and radiological characteristics. Two groups of data collected at different time periods were used as two test sets to access the discrimination and clinical usefulness. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) was applied to performance evaluation.ResultThe general radiomics signature yielded the highest AUC of 0.756 and 0.739 in the two test sets, respectively. When applying to same type of CT, the performance of general radiomics signature was always similar to or higher than that of models built using only NE-CT or CE-CT features. The general radiomics nomogram combining general radiomics signature, smoking history, emphysema, and ILD achieved higher performance whether applying to NE-CT or CE-CT (test set 1, AUC = 0.833 and 0.842; test set 2, AUC = 0.839 and 0.850).ConclusionsOur work demonstrated that using general features to construct radiomics signature and nomogram could help identify EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients and expand its scope of clinical application.Key points• General features were proposed to construct general radiomics signature using different types of CT of different patients at the same time to identify EGFR mutation status of NSCLC patients. • The general radiomics nomogram based on general radiomics signature, and clinical and radiological characteristics could identify EGFR mutation status of patients with NSCLC and outperformed the general radiomics signature. • The general radiomics nomogram had a wider scope of clinical application; no matter which of NE-CT and CE-CT the patient has, its EGFR mutation status could be predicted.

Project description:PurposeTo evaluate the feasibility of using contrast material-enhanced computed tomographic (CT) measurements of hepatic fractional extracellular space (fECS) and macromolecular contrast material (MMCM) uptake to measure severity of liver fibrosis.Materials and methodsAll procedures were approved by and executed in accordance with University of California, San Francisco, institutional animal care and use committee regulations. Twenty-one rats that received intragastric CCl(4) for 0-12 weeks were imaged with respiratory-gated micro-CT by using both a conventional contrast material and a novel iodinated MMCM. Histopathologic hepatic fibrosis was graded qualitatively by using the Ishak fibrosis score and quantitatively by using morphometry of the fibrosis area. Hepatic fECS and MMCM uptake were calculated for each examination and correlated with histopathologic findings by using uni- and multivariate linear regressions.ResultsIshak fibrosis scores ranged from a baseline of 0 in untreated animals to a maximum of 5. Histopathologic liver fibrosis area increased from 0.46% to 3.5% over the same interval. Strong correlations were seen between conventional contrast-enhanced CT measurements of fECS and both the Ishak fibrosis scores (R(2) = 0.751, P < .001) and the fibrosis area (R(2) = 0.801, P < .001). Strong negative correlations were observed between uptake of MMCM in the liver and Ishak fibrosis scores (R(2) = 0.827, P < .001), as well as between uptake of MMCM in the liver and fibrosis area (R(2) = 0.643, P = .001). Multivariate linear regression analysis showed a trend toward independence for fECS and MMCM uptake in the prediction of Ishak fibrosis scores, with an R(2) value of 0.86 (P = .081 and P = .033, respectively).ConclusionContrast-enhanced CT measurements of fECS and MMCM uptake are individually capable of being used to estimate the degree of early hepatic fibrosis in a rat model.Supplemental materialhttp://radiology.rsna.org/lookup/suppl/doi:10.1148/radiol.12112452/-/DC1.

Dataset Information

A contrast-enhanced-CT-based classification tree model for classifying malignancy of solid lung tumors in a Chinese clinical population.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Publications

A contrast-enhanced-CT-based classification tree model for classifying malignancy of solid lung tumors in a Chinese clinical population.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets