In-Depth Evaluation of a Case of Presumed Myocarditis After the Second Dose of COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Muthukumar A
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8340727 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the development of the first mRNA vaccines used in humans. The vaccines are well tolerated, safe, and highly efficacious; however, post-marketing surveillance is revealing potential rare adverse effects. We report a case of symptomatic acute myocarditis following administration of the second dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.Case summaryA 44-year-old man presented with chest pain and ST-segment elevation 4 days after receiving the second dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine. Emergent coronary angiogram showed minimal coronary artery disease. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed acute myocarditis. Diagnosis of vaccine-associated myocarditis was made given the temporal relationship and supportive treatment initiated. Follow-up at 1 month confirmed complete symptomatic recovery and echocardiogram demonstrated normalization of cardiac function.DiscussionAcute myocarditis should be considered in patients who present with chest pain or dyspnoea within days of receiving mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, especially after the second dose. This may be managed successfully with supportive therapies with complete recovery of cardiac function and symptoms. Further research is warranted to determine the mechanisms by which mRNA vaccines may cause myocarditis and for potential long-term cardiovascular injury.
| S-EPMC8422333 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Myocarditis is an adverse event associated with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccination. A 50-year-old man presented with dyspnea and resting chest pain after receiving the second dose of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine and developed cardiogenic shock. Fulminant myocarditis was diagnosed by endomyocardial biopsy and treated with intravenous corticosteroids.
| S-EPMC8819635 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe rates of suspected allergic reactions to the first dose of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccines have been reported to be as high as 2%, with an anaphylaxis incidence up to 2.5 per 10,000 individuals. Anaphylaxis in response to the first dose may be considered a contraindication to administration of the second dose, even though the second dose is necessary for optimal protection against severe disease. Many individuals with anaphylactic reactions to the first dose still want to receive a second dose. However, there are few published data to support the safety of administration of a second dose in this population.ObjectiveThe primary objective of this study was to determine the percentage of patients tolerating a second COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose after an immediate reaction to the first dose.MethodsThis was a retrospective chart review of 47 patients at a Canadian hospital who had immediate, suspected allergic reactions following their first COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose and received a second dose within our allergy clinic.ResultsOf 47 patients, 46 tolerated the second dose; 43% of patients developed mild, transient symptoms. There were no patients who developed anaphylaxis or needed epinephrine after the second dose.ConclusionOur case series adds to current evidence that administration of a second COVID-19 mRNA vaccine dose has a good safety profile in patients with a history of immediate reactions after the first dose, including those with a history of anaphylaxis in response to the first dose.
| S-EPMC9010013 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Acute allergic reactions to messenger RNA (mRNA) vaccines are rare but may limit public health immunization efforts. Objectives: To characterize suspected allergic reactions to the first dose of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) mRNA vaccine and to assess the safety and utility of a two-step graded-dose protocol for the second dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine in patients with a history of low suspicion of anaphylaxis to their first dose. Methods: This was a retrospective evaluation of referrals to the allergy and immunology clinic for a presumed allergic reaction to the first dose of the COVID-19 mRNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna) between December 17, 2020, and February 28, 2021. Recommendations for the second dose and outcomes were evaluated by trained board-certified allergists. Results: Seventy-seven patients presented with a Pfizer-BioNTech reaction (56 [72.7%]) or with a Moderna reaction (21 [27.3%]). Most patients (69.7%) had symptom onset within 4 hours. Most commonly reported symptoms were cutaneous (51.9%), cardiovascular (48.1%), and respiratory (33.8%) symptoms. Recommendations included to proceed with the single dose (70.1%), two-step graded dose (19.5%), or deferral (10.4%). Twelve of 15 patients completed the second dose with a graded-dose protocol. Of these patients, five reported at least one or more similar symptoms as experienced with their first dose. Conclusion: Of the patients with presumed allergic reactions to their first dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccine, most were able to safely receive the second dose. For those with a low suspicion of anaphylaxis, the two-step graded protocol with the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine was well tolerated. A graded-dose protocol could be an effective strategy for second-dose vaccination in those who may otherwise defer the second dose.
| S-EPMC8654380 | biostudies-literature
Project description:A 40-year-old man with history of prior coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection developed pleuritic chest pain 3 days after receiving the first dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Echocardiography results were significant for mild dysfunction and left ventricular hypertrophy. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed myocardial edema as well as delayed enhancement in the inferior wall of the basal left ventricular myocardium, suggestive of acute myocarditis. This case describes the work-up, diagnosis, risk-stratification, and management of acute myocarditis post BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. <Learning objective:1.To suspect acute myocardial inflammation in patients who present with chest symptoms after receiving the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine.2.To review the clinical presentation and laboratory, electrocardiographic, and imaging parameters for diagnosing acute myocarditis.3.To review the indications for endomyocardial biopsy in patients presenting with possible myocarditis.>.
| S-EPMC8739668 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundApproximately 5.1 million Israelis had been fully immunized against coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) after receiving two doses of the BNT162b2 messenger RNA vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech) by May 31, 2021. After early reports of myocarditis during adverse events monitoring, the Israeli Ministry of Health initiated active surveillance.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed data obtained from December 20, 2020, to May 31, 2021, regarding all cases of myocarditis and categorized the information using the Brighton Collaboration definition. We analyzed the occurrence of myocarditis by computing the risk difference for the comparison of the incidence after the first and second vaccine doses (21 days apart); by calculating the standardized incidence ratio of the observed-to-expected incidence within 21 days after the first dose and 30 days after the second dose, independent of certainty of diagnosis; and by calculating the rate ratio 30 days after the second dose as compared with unvaccinated persons.ResultsAmong 304 persons with symptoms of myocarditis, 21 had received an alternative diagnosis. Of the remaining 283 cases, 142 occurred after receipt of the BNT162b2 vaccine; of these cases, 136 diagnoses were definitive or probable. The clinical presentation was judged to be mild in 129 recipients (95%); one fulminant case was fatal. The overall risk difference between the first and second doses was 1.76 per 100,000 persons (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.33 to 2.19), with the largest difference among male recipients between the ages of 16 and 19 years (difference, 13.73 per 100,000 persons; 95% CI, 8.11 to 19.46). As compared with the expected incidence based on historical data, the standardized incidence ratio was 5.34 (95% CI, 4.48 to 6.40) and was highest after the second dose in male recipients between the ages of 16 and 19 years (13.60; 95% CI, 9.30 to 19.20). The rate ratio 30 days after the second vaccine dose in fully vaccinated recipients, as compared with unvaccinated persons, was 2.35 (95% CI, 1.10 to 5.02); the rate ratio was again highest in male recipients between the ages of 16 and 19 years (8.96; 95% CI, 4.50 to 17.83), with a ratio of 1 in 6637.ConclusionsThe incidence of myocarditis, although low, increased after the receipt of the BNT162b2 vaccine, particularly after the second dose among young male recipients. The clinical presentation of myocarditis after vaccination was usually mild.
| S-EPMC8531987 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Arrhythmogenic left ventricular cardiomyopathy (ALVC) is a rare heritable heart-muscle disorder characterized by a progressive loss of left ventricular myocardium and its replacement by fibrofatty tissue. Myocarditis is an inflammatory disease of the heart that may occur secondary to infections, immune system activation or exposure to drugs. Hot phases of ALVC present with chest pain and troponin rise, mimicking acute viral myocarditis and indicate a progression of the disease. Recently, myocarditis has also been described as an infrequent complication of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) mRNA vaccines. We herein report for the first time a case of probable myocarditis induced by Covid-19 vaccine in a patient with previous medical history of ALVC. We aim to highlight the common characteristics of ALVC and Covid-19 vaccine myocarditis and work through the differential diagnosis of these two entities.
| S-EPMC8545905 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Introduction Myocarditis has been reported following the second dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination. Whether administration of additional doses of COVID-19 vaccines further increases the risk of myocarditis is unknown. Methods We included individuals who received one to three doses of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 mRNA vaccine between 12/14/2020 and 2/18/2022. Myocarditis within 21 days of vaccine administration was identified using electronic medical records. Incidence rate ratios were calculated by comparing the observed incidence with the expected incidence from the same population during a 365-day baseline period. Results Of 3,076,660 KPSC members who received at least one dose of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, 2,916,739 (94.5%) received at least two doses, and 1,146,254 (47.0%) received three doses. The incidence rate ratio for myocarditis was 0.86 (95% CI 0.31–1.93) for the first dose, 4.22 (95% CI 2.63–6.53) for the second dose, and 2.61 (1.13–5.29) for the third dose. Most myocarditis cases following the second and third dose occurred within seven days of vaccination. Conclusion Myocarditis was a rare event observed after the second or third dose of vaccination. Most cases presented within seven days of vaccination. The incidence of myocarditis following the third dose was not significantly higher than that observed after the second dose.
| S-EPMC9299985 | biostudies-literature
Project description:We conducted a prospective, mobile-based survey on the self-reported adverse reactions in healthcare workers (HCWs) who received both doses of the BNT162b2 mRNA vaccine. Of the 342 HCWs who completed the two-dose vaccination, 265 (77.5%) responded to the survey at least once. Overall, the rates of adverse reactions were higher after the second dose compared with the first dose (89.1% vs. 80.1%, P = 0.006). The most common systemic reactions were muscle ache (69.1%), fatigue (65.7%), headache (48.7%), chills (44.2%), and fever (32.1%), and were notably more common after the second dose vaccine as well. We also noted a sex difference in which the frequency of adverse reactions after the second dose of the vaccine was significantly higher in females, which was not observed after the first dose. The rates of adverse reactions were lower in older age groups, and the rates and severities of the adverse reactions decreased during the 3-day period following vaccination.
| S-EPMC8167406 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundThe SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the development of the first mRNA vaccines used in humans. These vaccines are well tolerated, safe, and highly effective; however, post-marketing surveillance is revealing potential rare adverse effects. We report a case of incessant pericarditis following administration of the second dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, unresponsive to conventional therapy, and successfully treated with anakinra.Case summaryA 30-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department for incessant pericarditis unresponsive to evacuative pericardiocentesis and conventional first-line anti-inflammatory therapy. Given the typical 'inflammatory phenotype' clinically characterized by fever, C-reactive protein (CRP) elevation, and leucocytosis, we decided, in agreement with the rheumatologist team, to avoid glucocorticoid and to administer anakinra. A sudden clinical and echocardiographic improvement was observed, with complete resolution of the symptoms and of the pericardial effusion; similarly, CRP values progressively decreased. The patient was discharged at home; no recurrences of pericarditis were described at clinical and instrumental follow-up made 3 months later.DiscussionSeveral cases of pericarditis have been described in patients who received the COVID-19 vaccination, especially with the mRNA vaccine that can induce a non-adaptive immunity response against the viral spike protein, triggering cardiac damage for a molecular mimicry mechanism; however, defined pathogenesis of pericarditis associated with mRNA vaccine is still missing. The clinical scenario described is characterized by the typical 'inflammatory phenotype', triggered by a disproportionate and uncontrolled activation of the inflammasome based on an interleukin-1 (IL-1) overproduction. We administered anakinra, an IL-1 blocking drug, with a sharp clinical, echocardiographic and laboratoristic improvement. The complete response observed in this case suggests that vaccine-related pericarditis could be triggered by an auto-inflammatory pathway based on IL-1 overproduction. Further research is, therefore, warranted to determine the mechanisms by which the mRNA vaccine may cause pericarditis in order to choose the most targeted therapy.
| S-EPMC9470051 | biostudies-literature