Dataset Information

Prevalence of clinically relevant liver fibrosis due to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in Indian individuals with type 2 diabetes.

ABSTRACT:

Background and aim

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in associated with higher prevalence and worse outcomes of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). However, data regarding the prevalence of clinically relevant liver fibrosis (CRLF) in Indian individuals with T2D are scarce. We investigated the prevalence of, and factors associated with, CRLF in Indians with T2D.

Methods

We conducted a prospective study of 601 consecutive adults with T2D. Steatosis was diagnosed using ultrasonography. Liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography of ≥8.0 kPa was taken as cutoff suggesting CRLF. Individuals with LSM > 13.0 kPa underwent dynamic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of liver for detecting changes consistent with cirrhosis.

Results

The prevalence of steatosis was 84.2%. Higher body mass index (BMI, P = 0.022), alanine aminotransferase (ALT; P = 0.001), and lower high-density lipoprotein (HDL; P = 0.002) were independent factors associated with steatosis. The prevalence of CRLF was 28.2%. Higher BMI (P = 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST; P < 0.0001), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT; P < 0.0001), and concomitant hypertension (P = 0.03) were independent factors associated with CRLF. Elevated ALT and AST (≥40 units/L) levels were present in 70.6 and 51.6% individuals with CRLF, respectively. Thirty-one (7.2%) individuals had LSM > 13.0 kPa. Among them, 25 individuals underwent dynamic MRI of liver, which revealed features consistent with cirrhosis in 18 patients.

Conclusion

CRLF, an established risk factor for cirrhosis and overall mortality, affects at least one out of four (25%) Indians with T2D. These results support screening of all patients with T2D and NAFLD for liver fibrosis.

SUBMITTER: Kuchay MS

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8341185 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceThe diagnostic performance of the fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) fibrosis score (NFS) for advanced fibrosis in lean patients with NAFLD is limited.ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the FIB-4 and NFS in lean individuals with NAFLD.Design, setting, and participantsThis diagnostic study included adults with biopsy-proven NAFLD from 6 referral centers in Asia from 1995 to 2019. Cohorts were matched by age and sex between the lean and nonlean groups. All statistical analyses were executed from October 2022 to March 2023.Main outcomes and measuresThe diagnostic performance of the FIB-4 and NFS at the current cutoff for advanced hepatic fibrosis in lean (body mass index [BMI] below 23 [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared]) and nonlean (BMI above 23) patients were evaluated.ResultsA total of 1501 patients were included in analysis (mean [SD] age, 46.1 [16.4] years); 788 male (52.5%), 115 lean (7.7%), 472 (30.2%) Korean, 821 (48.7%) Japanese, and 341 (21.3%) Taiwanese. Among the age- and sex-matched cohort, the mean (SD) age was 52.3 (15.1) years and 41.2% (47 of 114) were male. The diagnostic performance and areas under the operating characteristic curve of the FIB-4 (lean, 0.807 vs nonlean, 0.743; P = .28) and NFS (lean, 0.790 vs nonlean, 0.755; P = .54) between the 2 groups were comparable in the age- and sex-matched cohort. The sensitivity and specificity of the NFS showed increasing and decreasing tendency according to the BMI quartiles (P for trend < .001), while those of the FIB-4 did not (P for trend = .05 and P = .20, respectively). Additionally, although the areas under the operating characteristic curve of the FIB-4 and NFS were not significantly different in the lean group (0.807 vs 0.790; P = .09), the sensitivity of the current NFS cutoff values was lower in the lean group than in that of FIB-4 (54.4% vs 81.8%; P = .03).Conclusions and relevanceIn this cohort study, the performance of the FIB-4 and NFS in diagnosing advanced fibrosis did not differ significantly between the 2 groups overall. However, in lean NAFLD, while the sensitivity for diagnosing advanced hepatic fibrosis remained reasonable at the current cutoff level, the sensitivity of NFS at the current cutoff was too low to be an adequate screening tool.