Dataset Information

A Percutaneous Technique for Reduction and Internal Fixation of Displaced Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

A retrospective cohort study demonstrated that, in comparison with open reduction and internal fixation through an extensile lateral approach, our percutaneous technique for reduction and internal fixation of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures decreases the rate of complications and achieves and maintains extra-articular fracture reductions just as well.

Step 1 patient positioning and imaging

Position the patient correctly to obtain excellent fluoroscopic views, which are key to the procedure.

Step 2 fracture reduction

The techniques for reducing and fixing joint depression and tongue-type calcaneal fractures differ and will be described separately.

Step 3 screw fixation

Identify screw entry points and paths using fluoroscopic images, and confirm the final positions with c-arm imaging.

Step 4 postoperative management

Apply a splint; then obtain postoperative images to confirm fracture reduction and screw placement.

Results & preop/postop images

The results of percutaneous reduction of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures in seventy-nine patients with a total of eighty-three fractures were compared with those obtained by another surgeon using the extensile lateral approach.

What to watch for

IndicationsContraindicationsPitfalls & Challenges.

SUBMITTER: Marsh JL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8343976 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThis study sought to assess and compare the clinical efficacy and complications of a modified sinus tarsi approach (MSTA) and the extensile lateral approach (ELA) in the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneal fractures.MethodsThis retrospective study enrolled 108 patients (117 feet) with Sanders II-IV calcaneal fractures, including 52 patients (56 feet) in the MSTA group and 56 patients (61 feet) in the ELA group. The functional and radiological results of the affected feet were analysed retrospectively. Functional evaluation included American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS), visual analog scale (VAS), and Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Radiological evaluation included preoperative and postoperative changes in the Bohler Angle, Gissane Angle, length, width, and height of the calcaneus. The postoperative complications were also collected and analysed. The independent-samples t-test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were employed to compare differences between the two groups. Differences within the same group were compared by paired Student's t-test, and categorical variables were compared using the chi-square test.ResultsThe postoperative functional and radiological results showed that the mean AOFAS, VAS and physical component summary of SF-36 scores in the MSTA group were higher than those in the ELA group (P<0.05). After surgery, the Bohler and Gissane angles were significantly improved in both groups, as were the length, width, and height of the calcaneus; no statistically significant differences existed between the two groups. The incidences of wound healing complications and postoperative sural nerve injury were lower in the MSTA group than in the ELA group (P<0.000).ConclusionsThe MSTA can achieve similar effects to the ELA in terms of anatomical reconstruction and functional recovery. It also can also effectively reduce the incidences of wound healing complications and postoperative sural nerve injury, and shorten the length of hospital stay.

Project description:BackgroundThe Calcaneus is the largest bone of the foot and the most frequent tarsal bone to be fractured. Overall, it causes round about 10 cases per 100,000 residents per year mainly in men. Especially displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures often have early and late complications and its associated disability. There are various strategies for the treatment of displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures, but the gold standard is still subject of a long-standing controversy. Minimally invasive procedures became more common in an attempt to reduce the high rate of complications associated with open reduction and internal fixation. With the increase in minimally invasive techniques, screw fixation also gained in significance. The current literature does not sufficiently elucidate whether the screw fixation is superior to other treatment options especially in relation to adverse events, health-related quality of life and postoperative pain. This study aims to investigate benefits and harms of treating displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures (types II, III and IV according to Sanders) with screw fixation in adults.MethodsA systematic review will be conducted based on the principles described in the Cochrane Handbook. We will include adults with displaced intra-articular calcaneus fractures of Sanders type II, III and IV. The surgical method of screw fixation shall be compared to other surgical interventions to stabilise calcaneus fractures. Primary outcomes are serious adverse events, health-related quality of life and postoperative pain level. MEDLINE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, Web of Science and bibnet.org, ClinicalTrial.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTR) will be searched. Screening and data extraction will be performed by two authors independently. A third author will arbitrate disputes. Risk of Bias will be assessed with the Cochrane tool. Meta-analysis will be performed if participants, interventions, comparisons and outcomes are sufficiently similar to ensure a result that is clinically meaningful.DiscussionDue to the increasing use of minimally invasive techniques and the increasing use of screw fixation instead of open reduction and plate fixation, it is important to analyse the benefits and harms of screw fixation for calcaneus fractures. Screw fixation could, in the future, help to operate in a less invasive and tissue preserving manner while still achieving an adequate functional result for the patient SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: CRD42021244695.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Sinus tarsi approach and mini-calc plate have been used for intra-articular calcaneal fractures. However, the sinus tarsi approach has limited exposure to the lateral wall, which makes it challenging to obtain an excellent anatomic reduction of the calcaneal body. What is more! To restore the width of the calcaneal body entirely and prevent the heel varus simultaneously with mini-calc plate was tough as well. Aimed to solve the aforementioned problems, our study focused on using the Steinmann pin retractor for reduction and the circle plate for fixation via the sinus tarsi approach. METHODS:From March 2017 to January 2019, 15 patients with closed calcaneal fractures were treated with the method of Steinmann pin retractor-assisted reduction and circle plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach. All these patients received a positive postoperative clinical and radiological evaluation. RESULTS:A postoperative follow-up was done for each of the 15 patients, and the following scores and parameters were observed: value of visual analogue scale (VAS) was 1.44?±?0.63, and The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot score was 84.31?±?5.03 at the last follow-up. The Böhler angle (30.81?±?3.56°), width (37.83?±?4.87?mm), length (87.4?±?3.33?mm), and height (86.23?±?5.36?mm) of the calcaneus were improved significantly in comparison with preoperative values (-?0.94?±?10.06°, 45.67?±?5.68?mm, 82.72?±?5.54?mm, 76.32?±?7.98?mm), and these parameters were maintained excellently after 6-19?months' follow-up. CONCLUSION:Our present study suggested that Steinmann pin retractor-assisted reduction with circle plate fixation via the sinus tarsi approach may serve as a safe and effective method for Sanders type II and type III calcaneus fractures. The Böhler angle, height, length, and body of the calcaneus were excellently restored postoperatively and maintained at last follow-up and rare postoperative complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION:This study has been registered. The unique identifying number is research registry 5092.

Project description:Of all distal radius fractures, 25 % are complete articular fractures (AO/OTA type C fractures). Two thirds of those fractures are displaced and require reduction. According to several International Guidelines, adequately reduced intra-articular distal radius fractures are best treated non-operatively with plaster immobilisation, while surgical fixation is suggested only when the articular step exceeds 2 mm after reduction. However, these recommendations are based on studies that did not differentiate between intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures. Thus, no clear consensus about the best treatment for patients with displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures can be reached. Despite the lack of evidence, an increase in internal fixation of intra-articular distal radius fractures has been observed over the last decade. The aim of this study is to determine the difference in functional outcome following open reduction and plate fixation compared with non-operative treatment with closed reduction and plaster immobilisation in patients with a displaced intra articular distal radius fracture.This multicentre randomised controlled trial will randomise between open reduction and internal plate fixation (intervention group) and closed reduction and plaster immobilisation (control group). All consecutive adult patients from 18 to 65 years with a displaced intra-articular distal radius fracture (AO/OTA type C), which has been adequately reduced at the Emergency Department according to the Dutch National Guidelines, are eligible for inclusion in this study. The primary outcome is function and pain of the wrist assessed with the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE). Secondary outcomes are the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score (DASH), pain, quality of life (SF-36), range of motion, grip strength, radiological parameters, complications, crossovers and cost-effectiveness of both treatments. A total of 90 patients will be included in this study.Although displaced intra-articular distal radius fractures are common, there is still no evidence on the optimal treatment for these fractures in patients aged 18 to 65 years. Therefore we aim to determine the difference in functional outcome between open reduction and plate fixation and closed reduction and plaster immobilisation.This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02651779 ) on January 4(th) 2016.