Dataset Information

Relative sit-to-stand power: aging trajectories, functionally relevant cut-off points, and normative data in a large European cohort.

ABSTRACT:

Background

A validated, standardized, and feasible test to assess muscle power in older adults has recently been reported: the sit-to-stand (STS) muscle power test. This investigation aimed to assess the relationship between relative STS power and age and to provide normative data, cut-off points, and minimal clinically important differences (MCID) for STS power measures in older women and men.

Methods

A total of 9320 older adults (6161 women and 3159 men) aged 60-103 years and 586 young and middle-aged adults (318 women and 268 men) aged 20-60 years were included in this cross-sectional study. Relative (normalized to body mass), allometric (normalized to height squared), and specific (normalized to legs muscle mass) muscle power values were assessed by the 30 s STS power test. Body composition was evaluated by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and bioelectrical impedance analysis, and legs skeletal muscle index (SMI; normalized to height squared) was calculated. Habitual and maximal gait speed, timed up-and-go test, and 6 min walking distance were collected as physical performance measures, and participants were classified into two groups: well-functioning and mobility-limited older adults.

Results

Relative STS power was found to decrease between 30-50 years (-0.05 W·kg^-1 ·year^-1 ; P > 0.05), 50-80 years (-0.10 to -0.13 W·kg^-1 ·year^-1 ; P < 0.001), and above 80 years (-0.07 to -0.08 W·kg^-1 ·year^-1 ; P < 0.001). A total of 1129 older women (18%) and 510 older men (16%) presented mobility limitations. Mobility-limited older adults were older and exhibited lower relative, allometric, and specific power; higher body mass index (BMI) and legs SMI (both only in women); and lower legs SMI (only in men) than their well-functioning counterparts (all P < 0.05). Normative data and cut-off points for relative, allometric, and specific STS power and for BMI and legs SMI were reported. Low relative STS power occurred below 2.1 W·kg^-1 in women (area under the curve, AUC, [95% confidence interval, CI] = 0.85 [0.84-0.87]) and below 2.6 W·kg^-1 in men (AUC [95% CI] = 0.89 [0.87-0.91]). The age-adjusted odds ratios [95% CI] for mobility limitations in older women and men with low relative STS power were 10.6 [9.0-12.6] and 14.1 [10.9-18.2], respectively. MCID values for relative STS power were 0.33 W·kg^-1 in women and 0.42 W·kg^-1 in men.

Conclusions

Relative STS power decreased significantly after the age of 50 years and was negatively and strongly associated with mobility limitations. Our study provides normative data, functionally relevant cut-off points, and MCID values for STS power for their use in daily clinical practice.

SUBMITTER: Alcazar J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8350203 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Recently, a valid method to assess lower-body muscle power based on a sit-to-stand field test (STS) has been published. Our study aimed to describe lower-body muscle power in older individuals aged ≥ 60 years and examine the relationship of muscle weakness with adverse events according to gender- and age-specific muscle weakness cut-off points. A total of 3689 Colombian older adults (57.6% women, age 69.1 ± 6.9 years) from the 2015 Survey on Health, Well-Being, and Aging in Latin America and the Caribbean (SABE) participated in this study. Lower-body muscle power normalized to body mass was estimated by the five-repetitions STS test. Anthropometric, physical performance and clinical characteristics were collected. Age-specific percentiles using the LMS method, cut-off points and association with adverse events were calculated. Lower-body muscle power was greater in men than among women (2.2 ± 0.7 vs. 1.6 ± 0.5 W·kg-1, respectively; p < 0.001) at all ages. Muscle power ranked in the 50th percentile between 2.38 and 1.30 W·kg-1 in men, whereas women ranked between 1.79 and 1.21 W·kg-1. According to the cut-off points, lower-limb muscle power < 1 standard deviation in men was associated with having dynapenia, poor gait speed, cognitive impairment and mental, visual, hearing and memory problems. While, women were associated with having sarcopenia, dynapenia, poor gait speed, cognitive impairment, mental, hearing and memory problems, dementia and hospitalizations of > 24 h in the last year. Overall, participants with poor lower-limb muscle power had a significantly higher risk of adverse events [in men: odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.19-1.91, p < 0.001; in women: OR = 1.52, 95% CI = 1.27-1.87, p = 0.001] than their stronger counterparts. This study is the first to describe lower-limb muscle power values and cut-off points among a nationally representative sample of Colombian older adults. In men, 7 of the 14 adverse events studied were associated with lower muscle strength, whereas in women, it was 9 of the 14 adverse events.