Dataset Information

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Quality of Kidney Care: Data From Electronic Health Records.

ABSTRACT:

Rational & objective

Electronic health records can be leveraged to assess quality-of-care measures in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Neighborhood socioeconomic status could be a potential barrier to receiving appropriate evidence-based therapy and follow-up. We examined whether neighborhood socioeconomic status is independently associated with quality of care received by patients with CKD.

Study design

Observational study using electronic health record data.

Setting & participants

Retrospective study of patients seen at a health care system in the 7-county Minneapolis/St Paul area.

Exposures

Census tract socioeconomic status measures (wealth, income, and education).

Outcomes

Indicators of CKD quality of care: (1) prescription for angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker in patients with stage ≥ 3 CKD or stage 1 or 2 CKD with urinary albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) > 300 mg/d, (2) UACR measurement among patients with laboratory-based CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.72 m²), and (3) CKD identified on the problem list or coded for at an encounter among patients with laboratory-based CKD.

Analytic approach

Multilevel Poisson regression with robust error variance with a random intercept at the census tract level.

Results

Of the 16,776 patients who should be receiving an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, 65% were prescribed these medications. Among patients with laboratory-based CKD (n = 25,097), UACR was measured in 27% and CKD was identified in the electronic health record in 55%. We found no independent association between any neighborhood socioeconomic status measures and CKD quality-of-care indicators.

Limitations

1 health care system and selection bias.

Conclusions

We found no association of neighborhood socioeconomic status with quality of CKD care in our cohort. However, adherence to CKD guidelines is low, indicating an opportunity to improve care for all patients regardless of neighborhood socioeconomic status.

SUBMITTER: Ghazi L

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8350826 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportancePrediction models are widely used in health care as a way of risk stratifying populations for targeted intervention. Most risk stratification has been done using a small number of predictors from insurance claims. However, the utility of diverse nonclinical predictors, such as neighborhood socioeconomic contexts, remains unknown.ObjectiveTo assess the value of using neighborhood socioeconomic predictors in the context of 1-year risk prediction for mortality and 6 different health care use outcomes in a large integrated care system.Design, setting, and participantsDiagnostic study using data from all adults age 18 years or older who had Kaiser Foundation Health Plan membership and/or use in the Kaiser Permantente Northern California: a multisite, integrated health care delivery system between January 1, 2013, and June 30, 2014. Data were recorded before the index date for each patient to predict their use and mortality in a 1-year post period using a test-train split for model training and evaluation. Analyses were conducted in fall of 2019.Main outcomes and measuresOne-year encounter counts (doctor office, virtual, emergency department, elective hospitalizations, and nonelective), total costs, and mortality.ResultsA total of 2 951 588 patients met inclusion criteria (mean [SD] age, 47.2 [17.4] years; 47.8% were female). The mean (SD) Neighborhood Deprivation Index was -0.32 (0.84). The areas under the receiver operator curve ranged from 0.71 for emergency department use (using the LASSO method and electronic health record predictors) to 0.94 for mortality (using the random forest method and electronic health record predictors). Neighborhood socioeconomic status predictors did not meaningfully increase the predictive performance of the models for any outcome.Conclusions and relevanceIn this study, neighborhood socioeconomic predictors did not improve risk estimates compared with what is obtainable using standard claims data regardless of model used.

Project description:ContextEarly childhood caries (ECC) is a persistent public health challenge, affecting more than 56% of US toddlers and preschool-aged children. Despite this, ECC is largely preventable with routine oral hygiene practices, diet, and application of topical fluoride.ObjectiveThis study assessed the utilization of preventive oral health care in primary care practices and evaluated the variation in patient characteristic and geographic disparities.DesignWe conducted a retrospective study using electronic health records (EHRs) over a 2-year period. Patients' home addresses were geocoded and linked to census-based neighborhood statistics and fluoridated water accessibility. Multiple logistic regression modeling was used to assess the risk of ECC in patients with fluoride preventive care, controlled for demographics, comorbid conditions, and neighborhood risk factors.ParticipantsPatients aged 6 to 71 months who had primary care providers at family medicine and general pediatric clinics in a large academic medical center.Main outcome measureThe presence of dental caries based on diagnoses in EHRs.ResultsThe study consisted of 10 836 patients: 17% treated with topical fluoride varnish (TFV), 12% prescribed oral fluoride supplement, 6.1% with both TFV and supplement, and 64% without fluoride treatment. Patients with fluoride treatment were 24% to 53% less likely to have ECC. Children living in rural and nonfluoridated water communities had 1.7 to 1.8 times greater risk of developing ECC. Minority, under/uninsured, and low-income patients also were at an increased risk of ECC.ConclusionDespite continuing efforts to improve access to dental care for vulnerable populations, substantial disparities remain among socioeconomically disadvantaged children. To address dental care shortage, primary care clinicians should serve as the safety net to care for vulnerable and underserved children who have no or limited access to oral health services. Future research into the collaboration between primary care and dental providers at the level of both practice and professional education should be considered.

Project description:ImportanceData from electronic health records (EHRs) are increasingly used for risk prediction. However, EHRs do not reliably collect sociodemographic and neighborhood information, which has been shown to be associated with health. The added contribution of neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES) in predicting health events is unknown and may help inform population-level risk reduction strategies.ObjectiveTo quantify the association of nSES with adverse outcomes and the value of nSES in predicting the risk of adverse outcomes in EHR-based risk models.Design, setting, and participantsCohort study in which data from 90 097 patients 18 years or older in the Duke University Health System and Lincoln Community Health Center EHR from January 1, 2009, to December 31, 2015, with at least 1 health care encounter and residence in Durham County, North Carolina, in the year prior to the index date were linked with census tract data to quantify the association between nSES and the risk of adverse outcomes. Machine learning methods were used to develop risk models and determine how adding nSES to EHR data affects risk prediction. Neighborhood socioeconomic status was defined using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality SES index, a weighted measure of multiple indicators of neighborhood deprivation.Main outcomes and measuresOutcomes included use of health care services (emergency department and inpatient and outpatient encounters) and hospitalizations due to accidents, asthma, influenza, myocardial infarction, and stroke.ResultsAmong the 90 097 patients in the training set of the study (57 507 women and 32 590 men; mean [SD] age, 47.2 [17.7] years) and the 122 812 patients in the testing set of the study (75 517 women and 47 295 men; mean [SD] age, 46.2 [17.9] years), those living in neighborhoods with lower nSES had a shorter time to use of emergency department services and inpatient encounters, as well as a shorter time to hospitalizations due to accidents, asthma, influenza, myocardial infarction, and stroke. The predictive value of nSES varied by outcome of interest (C statistic ranged from 0.50 to 0.63). When added to EHR variables, nSES did not improve predictive performance for any health outcome.Conclusions and relevanceSocial determinants of health, including nSES, are associated with the health of a patient. However, the results of this study suggest that information on nSES may not contribute much more to risk prediction above and beyond what is already provided by EHR data. Although this result does not mean that integrating social determinants of health into the EHR has no benefit, researchers may be able to use EHR data alone for population risk assessment.

Project description:Rational & objectiveNeighborhood socioeconomic status (SES) and health insurance status may be important upstream social determinants of chronic kidney disease (CKD), but their relationship remains unclear. The aim of this study was to determine whether neighborhood SES and individual-level health insurance status were independently associated with CKD prevalence.Study designObservational study using electronic health records (EHRs).Setting & participantsEHRs of patients (n = 185,269) seen at a health care system in the 7-county Minneapolis/St Paul area (2017-2018).ExposuresCensus tract neighborhood SES measures (median value of owner-occupied housing units [wealth], percentage of residents aged >25 years with bachelor's degree or higher [education]) and individual-level health insurance status (aged <65 years: Medicaid vs other insurance; ≥65 years: Medicare vs Medicare and supplemental insurance plan) were obtained from the American Community Survey and EHR data. Neighborhood SES was operationalized into quartiles, comparing low (first quartile) versus high (fourth quartile) neighborhood SES.OutcomesCKD prevalence: estimated glomerular filtration rate < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or proteinuria.Analytic approachMultilevel Poisson regression with robust error variance with a random intercept at the census-tract level, adjusted for demographic and clinical covariates, was used to estimate the association between neighborhood SES, insurance, and CKD.ResultsNeighborhood SES and insurance were independently associated with CKD prevalence. In covariate-adjusted models, patients living in low versus high neighborhood SES had a higher CKD prevalence among both younger and older patients. For example, the prevalence ratios of CKD in low versus high neighborhood SES as defined by education among patients younger than 65 and 65 years and older were 1.11 (95% CI, 1.05-1.18) and 1.08 (95% CI, 1.04-1.12), respectively. Patients younger than 65 years receiving Medicaid had higher CKD prevalence versus those with other insurance (1.51 [95% CI, 1.43-1.6]). For patients 65 years and older, insurance was not associated with prevalence of CKD in the fully adjusted model.LimitationsOne health care system and selection bias.ConclusionsLiving in low neighborhood SES as defined by wealth and education and having Medicaid for patients younger than 65 years were associated with higher CKD prevalence.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Generic drug use in the outpatient setting is typically measured with adjudicated pharmacy claims; however, not all delivery systems have access to these data for their clinical populations. OBJECTIVE:To develop an algorithm to estimate generic drug use in an outpatient setting using electronic health records (EHR) data. METHODS:Twenty-five therapeutic classes were chosen with the potential for low generic use that were prescribed to managed care beneficiaries in a health care system in Northern California. An algorithm was developed to estimate generic drug use based on medication names and dispense-as-written requests from electronic prescriptions, as well as information on generic availability at the time the prescriptions were written. The algorithm was used to quantify a generic utilization rate (GUR) across therapeutic classes and was validated by comparing the estimated GUR to the true GUR, using pharmacy claims corresponding to prescriptions in the same patient cohort. RESULTS:Among managed care beneficiaries, 104,859 prescriptions were identified for drugs in the therapeutic classes of interest with corresponding pharmacy claims. The algorithm estimated a GUR of 73.7% across 25 unique classes. The actual GUR based on pharmacy claims was 73.1%. Sensitivity (97%) and specificity (89%) of the algorithm were high, and total percentage of agreement was 95%. CONCLUSIONS:An algorithm that estimates generic drug use performed well in a population of managed care beneficiaries. Health care delivery systems may apply methods described in this article to quantify generic drug use in their ambulatory populations for quality improvement and research initiatives, particularly when pharmacy claims are unavailable. DISCLOSURES:This study was funded by a grant from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in cooperative agreement with the Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute (1U01FD005267-01). Romanelli has received research grant support from Pfizer and Janssen Scientific Affairs. Authors have no other conflicts to disclose. Romanelli and Segal contributed the study concept and design. Nimbal took the lead in data collection, assisted by Romanelli. All authors were involved with data interpretation and revision of the manuscript. The manuscript was written by Romanelli and Nimbal.