Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Factors influencing the detection of treatable epileptogenic lesions on MRI. A randomized prospective study.


ABSTRACT:

Background

To prospectively analyze factors associated with detecting epileptogenic lesions on MRI within the work-sharing process of neurologists, epileptologists, radiologists and neuroradiologists.

Methods

We assembled four sets of six MRI scans, each set representing five typical epileptogenic lesions (hippocampal sclerosis or limbic encephalitis; focal cortical dysplasias; periventricular nodular or other heterotopias; long-term epilepsy associated tumors; gliotic scar, hemosiderin or cavernoma), and non - lesional epilepsy. At professional conferences, we invited neurologists, epileptologists, radiologists, and neuroradiologists to read two out of four MRI sets, one of which was presented with a clinical focus hypothesis. Participants were randomly assigned to MRI sets. Effects of examiners' specialty, duration of training and professional experience on detection rate of epileptogenic lesions were investigated.

Results

Fourty-eight neurologists, 22 epileptologists, 20 radiologists and 21 neuroradiologists read 1323 MRI scans. Overall, 613 of 1101 (55.7%) epileptogenic lesions were detected. Long-term epilepsy associated tumors (182/221, 82.4%) were found more frequently than gliotic scar, hemosiderin or cavernoma (157/220, 71.4%), hippocampal sclerosis or limbic encephalitis (141/220, 64.1%), nodular heterotopia (68/220, 30.9%) and focal cortical dysplasias (65/220, 29.5%, p < 0.001). Provision of a focus hypothesis improved the detection of hippocampal sclerosis or limbic encephalitis (86/110, 78.2% vs 55/110, 50%, p < 0.001) and focal cortical dysplasias (40/110, 36.4% vs 25/110, 22.7%, p = 0.037). Neuroradiologists and epileptologists were more likely than radiologists and neurologists to be amongst the most successful readers. In multivariable analysis, type of epileptogenic lesion, specialty of MRI reader, and provision of focus hypothesis predicted correct identification of epileptogenic lesions.

Conclusions

Epileptogenic lesions are often not recognized on MRI even by expert readers. Their detection can be improved by providing a focus hypothesis. These results stress the need for training in the MRI characteristics of epilepsy - specific pathology, and, most importantly, interdisciplinary communication between neurologists/epileptologists and (neuro)radiologists to improve detection of epileptogenic lesions.

SUBMITTER: Wehner T 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8351149 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC8149682 | biostudies-literature
2004-01-01 | GSE755 | GEO
| S-EPMC9983246 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6715342 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10892440 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC11372231 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6419420 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC548275 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC10115236 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2222222 | biostudies-literature