Dataset Information

Self-rated health trajectory and frailty among community-dwelling older adults: evidence from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging (TLSA).

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

Self-rated health (SRH) is an assessment and predictor of health based on an individual's general condition; however, evidence of the value of SRH for predicting frailty remains scarce for older Asian adults. This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between SRH score trajectory and frailty among older individuals in Taiwan.

Design

An 8-year retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Data were retrieved from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging from 1999 to 2007.

Participants

Respondents aged 53-69 years old who were not frail or disabled in 1999 (n=1956).

Primary and secondary outcome measures

Frailty was defined using the Fried criteria. The group-based trajectory modelling technique was used to estimate SRH trajectories. Logistic regression analysis was used to examine the associations between changes in SRH and frailty.

Results

Four SRH trajectory classes were identified across the 8-year follow-up: 232 participants (11.9%) were classified into the constantly poor SRH group, 1123 (57.4%) into the constantly fair SRH group, 335 (17.1%) into the constantly good SRH group and 266 (13.6%) into the good-to-fair SRH group. After adjusting for gender, age, level of education, income, social participation, health behaviours and major comorbidities, it was found that age, poor income satisfaction, without job and constantly poor SRH were associated with increased risk of frailty, while constantly good SRH (OR 0.04, 95% CI (0.01 to 0.32)) and good-to-fair SRH (OR 0.19, 95% CI (0.06 to 0.63)) were associated with reduced risks of frailty.

Conclusions

Constantly poor SRH was associated with an increased risk of frailty in older age. SRH in older adults should be recognised as a predictive tool for future frailty. Diet and exercise interventions may help to prevent frailty among high-risk older individuals with constantly low SRH.

SUBMITTER: Chu WM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8351513 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundKorea is expected to become a super-aged society in 2026, and improving nutritional status, which is directly related to health problems, is therefore important for increasing healthy life expectancy. Frailty is the most complex phenotype of aging, and leads to adverse health outcomes, disability, poor quality of life, hospitalization, and mortality. Malnutrition is a major risk factor for frailty syndrome. This study aimed to investigate the incidence of pre-frailty or frailty in the second wave (T2, 2018-2019) according to general characteristics and nutritional status in the first wave (T1, 2016-2017); and examine the longitudinal association of nutritional status in T1 and the incidence of pre-frailty or frailty in T2 among older adults living in a community.MethodsA secondary data analysis was performed using the Korean Frailty and Aging Cohort Study (KFACS). Participants comprised 1125 community-dwelling older Korean adults aged 70-84 years (mean age: 75.03 ± 3.56 years; 53.8% males). Frailty was assessed using the Fried frailty index, and nutritional status was assessed using the Korean version of the Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form and blood nutritional biomarkers. Binary logistic regression was used to identify longitudinal associations between the nutritional status at T1 and pre-frailty or frailty at T2.ResultsOver the two-year follow-up period, 32.9% and 1.7% of the participants became pre-frail and frail, respectively. After the potential confounders were adjusted (sociodemographic, health behaviors, and health status characteristics), pre-frailty or frailty had a significant longitudinal association with severe anorexia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 4.17; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05-16.54), moderate anorexia (AOR, 2.31; 95% CI, 1.46-3.64), psychological stress or acute disease (AOR, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.26-5.39), and body mass index (BMI) less than 19 (AOR, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.20-14.04).ConclusionsAnorexia, psychological stress, acute disease, and low BMI are the most significant longitudinal risk factors for pre-frailty or frailty in older adults. As nutritional risk factors may be preventable or modifiable, it is important to develop interventions targeting the same. Community-based health professionals in health-related fields should recognize and manage these indicators appropriately to prevent frailty among older adults living in the community.

Project description:IntroductionThe Indian population is rapidly aging with huge proportion of illiterate and socioeconomically disadvantaged people and there is a dearth of research on the relationships between factors of socioeconomic vulnerability and frailty in older people. The present study examined the cross-sectional associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and physical frailty in community-dwelling older individuals in India.Materials and methodsThe data for the study were obtained from the Longitudinal Aging Study in India (LASI), which was conducted in 2017-18. The effective sample size was 14,652 older males and 15,899 older females aged 60 and over. The outcome variable was physical frailty phenotype measured from exhaustion, unintentional weight loss, weak grip strength, low physical activity, and slow walking time. The main explanatory variable was vulnerability status based on education, wealth and caste. The study carried out bivariate analysis to observe the association between vulnerability status and physical frailty. Further, multivariable binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to fulfil the objective of the study.ResultsA proportion of 10.5 and 14.4% of older males and females respectively were in the overall vulnerable category. The prevalence of physical frailty was high among older males from vulnerable population (31.4% vs 26.9%; p < 0.001). The adjusted estimates from multivariate analysis revealed that older adults from vulnerable category had 14% significantly higher odds of being frail in comparison to non-vulnerable category [AOR: 1.14; CI: 1.06,1.24]. The adjusted model further revealed that there were no significant gender differentials in physical frailty among older adults. Model-3 (adjusted model) revealed that older males and females from vulnerable population had 18% [AOR: 1.18; CI: 1.04,1.34] and 8% [AOR: 1.08; CI: 1.01,1.21] significantly higher odds of being physically frail in comparison to older males from non-vulnerable population respectively.ConclusionsAdverse socioeconomic circumstances such as low education, lower wealth and caste status that are associated with increased prevalence of physical frailty raise urgent questions both for public health practitioners and clinicians. The current findings may help to adapt public policies focusing on screening physical frailty in the clinical settings, especially among vulnerable populations as a marker of a possibly reversible vulnerability to adverse outcomes in old age.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Disability, which is considered a health-related condition, increases care demands and socioeconomic burdens for both families and communities. To confirm the trend of dynamic longitudinal changes in disability, this study aims to explore how disability is divided by the trajectory method, which deals with time-sequenced data. Additionally, this study examines the differences in demographics, geriatric conditions, and time spent at home among the trajectory groups in community-dwelling older adults. Home time is defined as the period during which the patient was not in a hospital or health care facility during their lifetime. METHODS:Records of 786 community-dwelling older participants were analyzed from the Aging Study of PyeongChang Rural Area, a population-based cohort study that took place over three years. Using 7 domains of activities of daily living and 10 domains of instrumental activities of daily living, participants were grouped into no dependency (0 disabled domain), mild (1 disabled domain), and severe (2 or more disabled domains) disability groups. The longitudinal trajectory group of disability was calculated as a trajectory method. Three distinct trajectory groups were calculated over time: a relatively-stable group (78.5%; n?=?617), a gradually-aggravated group (16.0%; n?=?126), and a rapidly-deteriorated group (5.5%; n?=?43). RESULTS:The average age of 786 participants was 73.3?years (SD: 5.8), and the percentage of female was 52.7%. It was found that 78.5% of patients showed relatively no dependence and 5.5% of older adults in a rural area showed severe dependence. Through applying the trajectory method, it was shown that the Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score was 10.2 points in the relatively-stable group and 3.1 points in the rapidly-deteriorating group by the 3rd year. Additionally, by the trajectory method, the rate of decrease in home time was 3.33% in the rapidly-deteriorated group compared to the relatively-stable group. CONCLUSIONS:This study shows the difference in demographics and geriatric conditions (such as SPPB) through the examination of longitudinal trajectory groups of disability in community-dwelling older adults. Significant differences were also found in the amount of home time among the trajectory groups.