Dataset Information

Behavioral strategies to reduce stress reactivity in opioid use disorder: Study design.

ABSTRACT:

Objectives

More than 2 million people in the United States had an opioid use disorder in 2017. Treatment for opioid use disorder-particularly medication combined with psychosocial support-is effective for reducing opioid use and decreasing overdose risk. However, approximately 50% of people who receive treatment will relapse or drop out. Stress reactivity, defined as the subjective and physiological response to stress, is heightened in people with opioid use disorder and higher stress reactivity is associated with poorer outcomes. Preliminary studies suggest that stress reactivity may be a key mechanistic target for improving outcomes. This article describes the design of an ongoing study examining behavioral strategies for reducing stress reactivity in adults with opioid use disorder. Our objective is to test the efficacy of two behavioral strategies for reducing stress reactivity and enhancing behavioral persistence in the context of stress (distress tolerance).

Method

We will recruit 120 adults with opioid use disorder and randomly assign them to brief training in (a) cognitive reappraisal, (b) affect labeling, or (c) a psychoeducational control. Participants will receive the training intervention followed by a laboratory stressor during which they will be instructed to apply the trained skill.

Results

Subjective and physiological responses to stress will be measured as indices of stress reactivity and the stressor task will include a behavioral persistence component as a measure of distress tolerance.

Conclusions

The ultimate goal of this study is to inform the development of behavioral interventions that can be used as an adjunct to medication-based treatment for opioid use disorder. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

SUBMITTER: McHugh RK

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8352497 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveThe United States is amidst an opioid epidemic, including synthetic opioids that may result in rapid death, leaving minimal opportunity for bystander rescue. We pilot tested a behavioral intervention to reduce the occurrence of opioid overdose among opioid dependent persons at high-risk for subsequent overdose.Materials and methodsWe conducted a single-blinded randomized-controlled trial of a repeated dose motivational interviewing intervention (REBOOT) to reduce overdose versus treatment as usual, defined as information and referrals, over 16 months at the San Francisco Department of Public Health from 2014-2016. Participants were 18-65 years of age, had opioid use disorder by Structured Clinical Interview, active opioid use, opioid overdose within 5 years, and prior receipt of naloxone kits. The intervention was administered at months 0, 4, 8, and 12, preceded by the assessment which was also administered at month 16. Dual primary outcomes were any overdose event and number of events, collected by computer-assisted personal interview, as well as any fatal overdose events per vital records.ResultsA total of 78 persons were screened and 63 enrolled. Mean age was 43 years, 67% were born male, 65% White, 17% African-American, and 14% Latino. Ninety-two percent of visits and 93% of counseling sessions were completed. At baseline, 33.3% of participants had experienced an overdose in the past four months, with a similar mean number of overdoses in both arms (p = 0.95); 29% overdosed during follow-up. By intention-to-treat, participants assigned to REBOOT were less likely to experience any overdose (incidence rate ratio [IRR] 0.62 [95%CI 0.41-0.92, p = 0.019) and experienced fewer overdose events (IRR 0.46, 95%CI 0.24-0.90, p = 0.023), findings that were robust to sensitivity analyses. There were no differences between arms in days of opioid use, substance use treatment, or naloxone carriage.ConclusionsREBOOT reduced the occurrence of any opioid overdose and the number of overdoses.Trial registrationclinicaltrials.gov NCT02093559.

Project description:BackgroundPolicy is a powerful tool for systematically altering healthcare access and quality, but the research to policy gap impedes translating evidence-based practices into public policy and limits widespread improvements in service and population health outcomes. The US opioid epidemic disproportionately impacts Medicaid members who rely on publicly funded benefits to access evidence-based treatment including medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). A myriad of misaligned policies and evidence-use behaviors by policymakers across federal agencies, state Medicaid agencies, and managed care organizations limit coverage of and access to MOUD for Medicaid members. Dissemination strategies that improve policymakers' use of current evidence are critical to improving MOUD benefits and reducing health disparities. However, no research describes key determinants of Medicaid policymakers' evidence use behaviors or preferences, and few studies have examined data-driven approaches to developing dissemination strategies to enhance evidence-informed policymaking. This study aims to identify determinants and intermediaries that influence policymakers' evidence use behaviors, then develop and test data-driven tailored dissemination strategies that promote MOUD coverage in benefit arrays.MethodsGuided by the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, and Sustainment (EPIS) framework, we will conduct a national survey of state Medicaid agency and managed care organization policymakers to identify determinants and intermediaries that influence how they seek, receive, and use research in their decision-making processes. We will use latent class methods to empirically identify subgroups of agencies with distinct evidence use behaviors. A 10-step dissemination strategy development and specification process will be used to tailor strategies to significant predictors identified for each latent class. Tailored dissemination strategies will be deployed to each class of policymakers and assessed for their acceptability, appropriateness, and feasibility for delivering evidence about MOUD benefit design.DiscussionThis study will illuminate key determinants and intermediaries that influence policymakers' evidence use behaviors when designing benefits for MOUD. This study will produce a critically needed set of data-driven, tailored policy dissemination strategies. Study results will inform a subsequent multi-site trial measuring the effectiveness of tailored dissemination strategies on MOUD benefit design and implementation. Lessons from dissemination strategy development will inform future research about policymakers' evidence use preferences and offer a replicable process for tailoring dissemination strategies.