Dataset Information

Causal Relationship Between Parathyroid Hormone and the Risk of Osteoarthritis: A Mendelian Randomization Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated an inverse association between parathyroid hormone (PTH) and the risk of osteoarthritis (OA). However, it remains unknown whether such association reflects causality. We aimed to apply a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the causal association between PTH and OA.

Materials and methods

We performed a two-sample MR analysis using summary statistics from 13 cohorts (PTH, N = 29,155) and a recent genome-wide association study meta-analysis (OA, N = 455,221) by the UK Biobank and Arthritis Research UK OA Genetics (arcOGEN). MR analyses were carried out mainly using the inverse-variance-weighted method. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the associations using the weighted median method, the MR-Egger method, and "leave-one-out" analysis. Analyses were performed again to test whether the associations remained statistically significant after excluding any outlier variants that were detected using the MR-PRESSO (Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy RESidual Sum and Outlier) test.

Results

Five single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were selected as instrumental variables at the genome-wide significance threshold (p < 5 × 10^-8). The causal effect between PTH and OA was genetically predicted using the inverse-variance-weighted method (odds ratio = 0.67, 95% confidence interval: 0.50-0.90; p = 0.008). This result was borne out using the weighted median method (odds ratio = 0.73, 95% confidence interval: 0.60-0.90; p = 0.004). The causality remained robust after discarding the outlier variants as well as SNPs associated with confounding factors.

Conclusion

MR analysis supported a potential causative relationship between decreased serum circulating PTH and a higher risk of hip and knee OA.

SUBMITTER: Huang G

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8352559 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveObservational research has indicated a potential link between dietary salt intake and susceptibility to dementia. However, it is important to note that these types of studies are prone to the issues of reverse causation and residual confounding. Therefore, we conducted a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) study to explore the causality.MethodTo explore the causal relationship between them, this Mendelian randomization (MR) study incorporated summary statistics of dietary salt intake and dementia. We estimated the causality between salt intake and the risk of overall dementia and various subtypes of dementia, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), Vascular dementia (VaD), and Lewy body dementia (LBD). The inverse variance-weighted (IVW) method was the major MR analysis. To conduct sensitivity analyses, we employed various MR methods, the pleiotropy residual sum and outlier (MR-PRESSO) method, and the leave-one-out approach. The MR-Egger intercept and Cochran's Q test were conducted to test pleiotropy and heterogeneity respectively.ResultsA suggestive association was observed for genetically predicted higher dietary salt intake and increased risk of overall dementia in the European ancestry [odds ratio (OR): 1.542; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.095-2.169; P = 0.013]. The causal relationship between dietary salt intake and overall dementia is robust with respect to the choice of statistical methods and is validated through extensive sensitivity analyses that guard against various model assumption violations. Meanwhile, no clear heterogeneity or pleiotropy was identified. However, we failed to detect a causal effect of dietary salt intake on the risk of various dementia subtypes.ConclusionThe results of this research present strong evidence that established a significant association between dietary salt intake and the likelihood of developing dementia. These findings reinforce the notion that the amount of dietary salt intake plays a crucial role in determining the risk of acquiring this cognitive condition. By establishing a definitive correlation, this study highlights the importance of reducing salt consumption as a preventive measure against dementia.

Project description:BackgroundThe 2019 coronavirus disease pandemic (COVID-19) poses an enormous threat to public health worldwide, and the ensuing management of social isolation has greatly decreased opportunities for physical activity (PA) and increased opportunities for leisure sedentary behaviors (LSB). Given that both PA and LSB have been established as major influencing factors for obesity, diabetes and cardiometabolic syndrome, whether PA/LSB in turn affects the susceptibility to COVID-19 by disrupting metabolic homeostasis remains to be explored. In this study, we aimed to systematically evaluate the causal relationship between PA/LSB and COVID-19 susceptibility, hospitalization and severity using a Mendelian randomization study.MethodsData were obtained from a large-scale PA dataset (N = 377,000), LSB dataset (N = 422,218) and COVID-19 Host Genetics Initiative (N = 2,586,691). The causal effects were estimated with inverse variance weighted, MR-Egger, weighted median and MR-PRESSO. Sensitivity analyses were implemented with Cochran's Q test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO, leave-one-out analysis and the funnel plot. Risk factor analyses were further conducted to investigate the potential mediators.ResultsGenetically predicted accelerometer-assessed PA decreased the risk for COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.88-0.97; P = 0.002), while leisure television watching significantly increased the risk of COVID-19 hospitalization (OR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.29-1.88; P = 4.68 × 10-6) and disease severity (OR = 1.85, 95% CI 1.33-2.56; P = 0.0002) after Bonferroni correction. No causal effects of self-reported moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA), accelerometer fraction of accelerations > 425 milligravities, computer use or driving on COVID-19 progression were observed. Risk factor analyses indicated that the above causal associations might be mediated by several metabolic risk factors, including smoking, high body mass index, elevated serum triglyceride levels, insulin resistance and the occurrence of type 2 diabetes.ConclusionOur findings supported a causal effect of accelerometer-assessed PA on the reduced risk of COVID-19 hospitalization as well as television watching on the increased risk of COVID-19 hospitalization and severity, which was potentially mediated by smoking, obesity and type 2 diabetes-related phenotypes. Particular attention should be given to reducing leisure sedentary behaviors and encouraging proper exercise during isolation and quarantine for COVID-19.