Dataset Information

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery.

Methods

Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariates associated with overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). Logistic regression was used to reveal factors predicting tumor regression grading.

Results

For patients with TRG 0-1, the 3- and 5-year OS rates were 85.2% and 74.5%, respectively, when compared to 56.1% and 44.1% in patients with TRG 2 and 28.2% and 23.0% in patients with TRG 3, respectively (p<0.001). TRGs were independent risk factors for OS. Similar findings were observed in RFS. Multivariable analysis revealed that an oxaliplatin-based regimen (p=0.017) was an independent predictor of TRG. The oxaliplatin-based regimen was superior to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen for OS (38.4 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.01). Subgroup analyses by histological subtype indicated that the oxaliplatin-based regimen improved the OS in nonsignet ring cell carcinoma compared to the nonoxaliplatin-based regimen (53.7 months vs 19.5 months, respectively; p=0.011). However, similar findings were not observed in RFS.

Conclusion

TRG was an independent factor of AGC treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. Oxaliplatin-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimens improve tumor response and may have an overall survival benefit for patients with nonsignet ring cell carcinoma.

SUBMITTER: Xie JW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8352744 | biostudies-literature | 2021

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

Xie Jian-Wei JW Lu Jun J Xu Bin-Bin BB Zheng Chao-Hui CH Li Ping P Wang Jia-Bin JB Lin Jian-Xian JX Chen Qi-Yue QY Cao Long-Long LL Lin Mi M Tu Ru-Hong RH Huang Ze-Ning ZN Lin Ju-Li JL Truty Mark J MJ Huang Chang-Ming CM

Frontiers in oncology 20210726

<h4>Objective</h4>To validate the prognostic value of tumor regression grading (TRG) and to explore the associated factors of TRG for advanced gastric cancer (AGC) with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) plus surgery.<h4>Methods</h4>Two hundred forty-nine AGC patients treated with NACT followed by gastrectomy at the Mayo Clinic, USA and the Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, China between January 2000 and December 2016 were enrolled in this study. Cox regression was used to identify covariat ...[more]

PMID: 34386413

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundA previous systematic review found that giving neoadjuvant chemotherapy before surgery improved survival compared with radiotherapy. However, the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery versus surgery alone is still unclear.ObjectivesTo assess the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in women with early or locally-advanced cervical cancer.Search methodsWe searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library) (to Issue 8, 2012), MEDLINE (OVID) (to Aug 2012), LILACS (to Aug 2012), Physician's Data Query (PDQ) (to Aug 2012). We sought both published and unpublished trials and undertook systematic searches of a number of trial sources with no restrictions.Selection criteriaRandomised trials comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery in women with early or locally-advanced cervical cancer who had not undergone any prior treatment likely to interfere with the treatment comparison. Trials giving radical radiotherapy for inoperable tumours and/or post-operative radiotherapy were also eligible. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), local and distant recurrence, rates of resection and surgical morbidity.Data collection and analysisTwo authors independently extracted and checked data from trial reports, Depending on the type of outcome, trial hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) were obtained or estimated from trial reports, or sought from trial investigators.Main resultsSix trials (1078 women) were identified for inclusion in this updated review. All six trials provided data on OS (1071 women) and PFS (1027 women). Data on resection rates and pathological response were only available for five trials (908 to 940 women) and data on recurrence were only available for four trials (737 women). Both OS (HR 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.62 to 0.96, P = 0.02) and PFS (HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93, P = 0.008) were significantly improved with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The estimate for local recurrence was in favour of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.45 to 0.99, P = 0.04), although heterogeneity was observed. The result was no longer significant when the random-effects model was used (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32 to 1.12, P = 0.11). Whilst not significant, estimates for distant recurrence (OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.45 to 1.14, P = 0.16) and rates of resection (OR 1.55, 95% CI 0.96 to 2.50, P = 0.07) tended to favour neoadjuvant chemotherapy, although heterogeneity was observed. Exploratory analyses of pathological response showed a significant decrease in adverse pathological findings with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.73, P = < 0.0001 for lymph node status; OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.41 to 0.82, P = 0.002 for parametrial infiltration) which, despite substantial heterogeneity, was still significant when the random-effects model was used. There were also no differences in the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on survival according to total cisplatin dose, chemotherapy cycle length or by cervical cancer stage.Authors' conclusionsBoth OS and PFS were improved with neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Although the effects were less clear on all other pre-specified outcomes, they all tended to be in favour of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Whilst these results appear to indicate that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may offer a benefit over surgery alone for women with early-stage or locally-advanced cervical cancer, the evidence is based on only a small number of trials, and further research may be warranted.

Project description:Background: The addition of intensive preoperative chemotherapy and using of a longer waiting period between neoadjuvant radiotherapy and total mesorectal excision (TME) surgery lengthen the time interval from the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment to definitive surgery in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). Here, we evaluated the prognostic value of different time intervals between the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment to TME surgery for LARC. Methods: A total of 2,267 patients with LARC, who received neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy and TME surgery, between January 2010 through December 2018 were recruited. The entire cohort was divided into 4 subgroups based on total-time-to surgery, defined as the time interval between initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and TME surgery (TTS): <13 weeks (TTS-1), 13 to <15 weeks (TTS-2), 15 to <17 weeks (TTS-3), ≥17 weeks (TTS-4). Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) rates in different TTS subgroup patients were compared, and hazard ratios (HR) for different demographic and clinicopathological variables, including TTS, were calculated to determine their prognostic significance. Results: The median follow-up time was 42.0 (range, 5-162) months. The 3-year OS, DFS, DMFS, and LRFS rates were 87.0, 79.4, 80.9, and 93.8%, respectively. The varied OS, DFS, and DFMS rates were detected among these different TTS subgroups (P = 0.010, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). Particularly, the lower survival outcome was mainly observed at patients in the shortest TTS group (TTS-1). Cox regression analysis confirmed that the only significant positive independent prognostic factor for 3-year DFS was a longer TTS (TTS 2-4 vs. TTS-1; HR 0.884, 95% CI 0.778-0.921, P < 0.001), while the significant negative independent prognosticfactors were moderate to poor tumor differentiation (vs. well-differentiated; HR 1.191, 95% CI 1.004-1.414, P = 0.045) and clinical N1-2 stage (vs. N0 stage; HR 1.190, 95% CI 1.052-1.347, P = 0.006). Conclusion: For patients with LARC, an interval between the initiation of neoadjuvant treatment and TME surgery of longer than 13 weeks is associated with favorable disease-free survival.

Project description:BackgroundBlood inflammation index has been shown to correlate with the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However, few studies have compared the efficacy of existing blood inflammatory markers in predicting the prognosis of patients with locally advanced gastric cancer in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to compare the prognostic value of existing commonly used blood inflammatory index in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy.MethodsThe clinicopathological data of patients with advanced gastric cancer from three centers in China were analyzed retrospectively. Univariate COX regression analysis was used to analyze the independent risk factors of poor tumor regression and overall survival (OS) in this part of patients, and the predictive value of different inflammatory indexes on prognosis was compared by C-index index. Finally, Inflammatory burden index(IBI) was grouped by X-tile software, and Kaplan-Meier method was used to compare the survival difference between groups.ResultsA total of 163 patients were enrolled in this study. The median age was 63 years(56-68). The median cycle of neoadjuvant therapy was 4(3-4). The median survival time was 85.1%(1 years), 65.6%(2 years), and 47.4%(3 years).Univariate analysis showed that IBI was an independent risk factor for non-TR(residual tumor cells>50%) (HR=1.08,95%CI:1.00-1.45,p<0.001)and OS(HR=1.04,95%CI:1.03-1.05,p<0.001). IBI is the best predictor of OS (C-index: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.78-0.87) among all inflammatory indexes. The IBI cutoff value was 52.1. It was found that the high IBI group had a higher incidence of postoperative complications(32.1%vs14.3%, p=0.001), the proportion of non-TR patients was significantly higher than that of the low IBI group(64.3%vs35.7%, p =0.001), and the high IBI group had a significantly lower OS((47.6% vs 87.6%, p < 0.001).ConclusionIBI is the best inflammatory index to predict the prognosis of advanced gastric cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, which will help guide patients' treatment decisions. This result still needs to be verified by large prospective studies.

Dataset Information

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

Prognostic Value of Tumor Regression Grading in Patients Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Plus Surgery for Gastric Cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets