Dataset Information

Comparison of the outcome between immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

ABSTRACT: Whether ICIs combined with chemotherapy can improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain. Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and who progressed on first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment were retrospectively collected. We reviewed the outcome of these patients treated with ICIs or ICIs combined chemotherapy (ICI + C). Total 30 patients were included. The ORR were 9.1% and 25.0% for the ICI and ICI + C groups. The ICI + C group showed the trend of longer progression-free survival and overall survival periods. Patients without the T790M mutation had a significantly longer PFS than did those without this mutation (4.23 [95% CI: 2.75-5.72] vs. 1.70 [95% CI: 0.00-3.51] months, HR:4.45, p = 0.019). ICIs combined with chemotherapy tended to be more effective than ICIs alone in pretreated EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The T790M mutation may be a potential biomarker.

SUBMITTER: Shen CI

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8352947 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Aug

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

Comparison of the outcome between immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Shen Chia-I CI Chao Heng-Sheng HS Shiao Tsu-Hui TH Chiang Chi-Lu CL Huang Hsu-Ching HC Luo Yung-Hung YH Chiu Chao-Hua CH Chen Yuh-Min YM

Scientific reports 20210809 1

Whether ICIs combined with chemotherapy can improve outcomes in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain. Patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and who progressed on first-line EGFR-TKIs treatment were retrospectively collected. We reviewed the outcome of these patients treated with ICIs or ICIs combined chemotherapy (ICI + C). Total 30 patients were included. The ORR were 9.1% and 25.0% for the ICI and ICI + C groups. The ICI + C group showed the trend of longer progression-fr ...[more]

PMID: 34373555

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe efficacy of neoadjuvant treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy in patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant remains unsatisfactory. This study explored the potential benefits of combining first-generation EGFR-TKI with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant treatment for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and methodsThe medical records of patients with III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received neoadjuvant therapy with EGFR-TKI at Shanghai Chest Hospital from October 2011 to October 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC who received first-generation TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment were included in the combination group, and those who received EGFR-TKI monotherapy were included in the monotherapy group. The study assessed the objective response rate (ORR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), downstaging rates of pathologic lymph nodes (from stage N2 to N1 or N0), major pathologic response (MPR) rate, pathological complete response (PCR) rate, and safety.ResultsA total of 74 631 patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC were screened, and 60 patients were included, 7 of whom did not undergo surgery after neoadjuvant targeted therapy. Of the remaining 53 patients, 15 received first-generation EGFR-TKI combined with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and 38 received EGFR-TKI monotherapy. The median follow-up time was 44.12 months. The ORR was 50.0% (9/18) in the combination group and 40.5% (17/42) in the monotherapy group (P = .495). The MPR rate was 20.0% (3/15) and 10.5% (4/38) in the combination and monotherapy groups, respectively (P = .359). No patients achieved PCR in the combination group, while 3 (7.89%) attained PCR in the monotherapy group. The 2 groups did not differ in N2 downstaging rate (P = .459). The median DFS was not reached in the combination group, while it was 23.6 months (95% CI: 8.16-39.02) in the monotherapy group (P = .832). Adverse events observed were consistent with those commonly associated with the 2 treatments.ConclusionCombination therapy with first-generation EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy could be considered a neoadjuvant treatment option for patients with stage III-N2 EGFR-mutant NSCLC, exhibiting acceptable toxicity. However, regarding short-term efficacy, combination therapy did not demonstrate superiority over EGFR-TKI monotherapy. Long-term follow-up is warranted for a more accurate assessment of the DFS and OS.

Project description:ObjectivesUse of immune checkpoint inhibitors as first-line treatment for advanced (stage IIIB/IV) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. Clinical trials comparing single-drug immunotherapy (IO) with immunotherapy plus chemotherapy (IC) are lacking. We aimed to compare the efficacy of IO alone with that of IC as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC.DesignSystematic review.Data sourcesPubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase for related studies on NSCLC; ClinicalTrials.gov, American Society of Clinical Oncology Meeting Library and World Conference on Lung Cancer for relevant conference abstracts (to July 2019).Eligibility criteriaArticles meeting the following criteria were selected: (1) randomised controlled trials on NSCLC treatment, (2) all individuals in the studies had not received treatment previously and (3) research on IO monotherapy using programmed death-1/programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) inhibitors or IC.Data extraction and synthesisAfter reading the original literature, two reviewers independently extracted the relevant information. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). We also extracted data on treatment-related adverse events and immune-related adverse events (irAEs).ResultsOverall, 10 randomised controlled clinical trials (n=5765) were included. As first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC, IC tended to yield better PFS, OS and ORR than did IO. Furthermore, IC yielded significantly better PFS than IO when tumour PD-L1 expression was at least 50% (HR: 1.81, 95% CI: 1.18 to 2.78) and yielded a better OS and PFS when tumour PD-L1 expression was at least 1%; IO resulted in fewer adverse events than did IC. However, the incidence of irAEs was higher for IO than for IC.ConclusionsThe findings of the indirect comparison indicate that IC as first-line treatment for advanced NSCLC is significantly more effective than IO in patients with PD-L1 expression in at least 50% of tumour cells.Trial registration numberCRD 42018116589.

Project description:Importance: Checkpoint inhibitor pneumonitis (CIP) is a rare but serious adverse event that may impact treatment decisions. However, there is limited information comparing CIP risks between immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy and combination with chemotherapy due to a lack of direct cross-comparison in clinical trials. Objective: To determine whether ICI combination with chemotherapy is superior to ICI in other drug regimens (including monotherapy) in terms of CIP risk. Study Design and Methods: This observational, cross-sectional and worldwide pharmacovigilance cohort study included patients who developed CIP from the World Health Organization database (WHO) VigiBase and the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database. Individual case safety reports (ICSR) were extracted from 2015 to 2020 in FAERS and from 1967 to 2020 in VigiBase. Timing and reporting odds ratio (ROR) of CIP in different treatment strategies were used to detect time-to-onset and the risk of pneumonitis after different immunotherapy regimens. Results: A total of 93,623 and 114,704 ICI-associated ICSRs were included in this study from VigiBase and FAERS databases respectively. 3450 (3.69%) and 3278 (2.86%) CIPs occurred after therapy initiation with a median of 62 days (VigiBase) and 40 days (FAERS). Among all the CIPs, 274 (7.9%) and 537 (16.4%) CIPs were associated with combination therapies. ICIs plus chemotherapy combination was associated with pneumonitis in both VigiBase [ROR 1.35, 95% CI 1.18-1.52] and FAERS [ROR 1.39, 95% CI 1.27-1.53]. The combination of anti-PD-1 antibodies and anti-CTLA-4 antibodies with chemotherapy demonstrated an association with pneumonitis in both VigiBase [PD-1+chemotherapy: 1.76, 95% CI 1.52-2.05; CTLA-4+chemotherapy: 2.36, 95% CI 1.67-3.35] and FAERS [PD-1+chemotherapy: 1.70, 95% CI 1.52-1.91; CTLA-4+chemotherapy: 1.70, 95% CI 1.31-2.20]. Anti-PD-L1 antibodies plus chemotherapy combinations did not show the association. Conclusion: Compared to ICI in other drug regimens (including monotherapy), the combination of ICI plus chemotherapy is significantly associated with higher pneumonitis toxicity. Anti-PD-1/CTLA4 medications in combination with chemotherapy should be obviated in patients with potential risk factors for CIP. Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, ChiCTR2200059067.

Project description:Simple Summary Although it is known that anti-PD1/L1 monotherapy does not render significant benefit in patients with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma, whether the addition of anti-PD1/L1 therapy to chemotherapy can enhance chemotherapy efficacy for TKI-refractory EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients is not clear. To address this question, we retrospectively analyzed a cohort of 178 EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients who had progressed on EGFR TKIs and received subsequent non-TKI systemic therapy to determine whether the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy truly improves clinical outcomes. We found that the addition of anti-PD1 immunotherapy did not add benefit to the platinum-based chemotherapy at the time of TKI progression for EGFR-mutant LUAD. Although underpowered, the anti-VEGF therapy demonstrated a trend towards adding benefit. As ongoing clinical trials with newer agents or combinations demonstrate preliminary efficacy in TKI-resistant EGFR-mutant LUAD patients, the ideal choice for post-TKI treatment is still being evaluated. Abstract Background: The benefit of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients whose tumor developed resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is not thoroughly investigated. The goal of this retrospective cohort study is to assess the clinical efficiency of immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in a real-world setting. Methods: This retrospective cohort study enrolled LUAD patients with EGFR sensitive mutations whose tumor had acquired resistance to EGFR TKIs and received systemic treatment with chemotherapy (chemo; n = 84), chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (chemoIO; n = 30), chemotherapy plus bevacizumab with or without IO (withBev; n = 42), and IO monotherapy (IO-mono; n = 22). Clinical progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Associations of clinical characteristics with outcomes were assessed using univariable and multi-covariate Cox Proportional Hazards regression models. Results: A total of 178 patients (median age = 63.3; 57.9% females) with a median follow-up time of 42.0 (Interquartile range: 22.9–67.8) months were enrolled. There was no significant difference in PFS between chemoIO vs. chemo groups (5.3 vs. 4.8 months, p = 0.8). Compared to the chemo group, patients who received withBev therapy trended towards better PFS (6.1 months vs. 4.8; p = 0.3; HR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.52–1.20), while patients treated with IO-mono had inferior PFS (2.2 months; p = 0.001; HR 2.22; 95% CI: 1.37–3.59). Furthermore, PD-L1 level was not associated with PFS benefit in the chemoIO group. Patients with EGFR-mutant LUAD with high PD-L1 (≥50%) had shorter PFS (5.8 months) than non-EGFR/ALK LUAD patients who received chemoIO (12.8 months, p = 0.002; HR 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08–0.56) as first-line treatment. Chemotherapy-based therapy rendered similar benefit to patients with either EGFR exon19 deletion vs. L858R in the LUAD. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis revealed that immunotherapy provided limited additional benefit to chemotherapy in TKI-refractory EGFR-mutant LUAD. Chemotherapy alone or combined with bevacizumab remain good choices for patients with actionable EGFR mutations.

Project description:BackgroundThe utilization of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) plus chemotherapy has increased significantly for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). It is still unclear whether such a treatment paradigm affects perioperative outcomes compared with other neoadjuvant treatment. We aimed to evaluate the perioperative outcomes of pulmonary resection after neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy and to compare them with neoadjuvant epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone for resectable NSCLC.MethodsA retrospective cohort including 194 stage IB-IIIB NSCLC underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant treatment between 2018 and 2020 were reviewed. Perioperative complications were evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and were compared using one-way analysis of variance for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square test.ResultsThere were 42, 54, and 98 patients in the neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy, EGFR-TKI, and chemotherapy alone groups, respectively. The tumor size before neoadjuvant treatment was well balanced among the three groups (P=0.122). A shorter median surgical time was observed in the EGFR-TKI group than ICI plus chemotherapy group and chemotherapy group alone (120 vs. 150 vs. 146 min, P=0.041). Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery was performed in 37 (88.1%), 49 (90.7%), and 57 (58.7%) patients in the three groups, respectively (P<0.001). A higher incidence of pneumonia (P=0.014) was found in the chemotherapy group. Perioperative mortality was observed in 1 patient (2.4%) in the ICI plus chemotherapy group and in 3 patients (3.1%) in the chemotherapy alone group (P=0.440). Patients in the ICI plus chemotherapy group had higher proportions of pathological complete response (40.5% vs. 11.1% vs. 6.1%, P<0.001) and downstaging of clinical N2 status (68.6% vs. 42.9% vs. 31.7%, P=0.012) than patients in EGFR-TKI group and chemotherapy alone group.ConclusionsSurgical resection for NSCLC following neoadjuvant ICI plus chemotherapy was safe and feasible, the perioperative outcomes were similar with neoadjuvant EGFR-TKI and chemotherapy alone without unexpected perioperative complications. Additional prospective studies are necessary to validate our findings.

Dataset Information

Comparison of the outcome between immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Publications

Comparison of the outcome between immunotherapy alone or in combination with chemotherapy in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets