Dataset Information

Association of Timing of Epinephrine Administration With Outcomes in Adults With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

ABSTRACT:

Importance

Administration of epinephrine has been found to be associated with an increased chance of survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), but the optimal timing of administration has not been fully investigated.

Objective

To ascertain whether there is an association between timing of epinephrine administration and patient outcomes after OHCA.

Design, setting, and participants

This cohort study included adults 18 years or older with OHCA treated by emergency medical services (EMS) personnel from April 1, 2011, to June 30, 2015. Initial cardiac rhythm was stratified as either initially shockable (ventricular defibrillation or pulseless ventricular tachycardia) or nonshockable (pulseless electrical activity or asystole). Eligible individuals were identified from among publicly available, deidentified patient-level data from the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Cardiac Epidemiologic Registry, a prospective registry of adults with EMS-treated, nontraumatic OHCA with 10 sites in North America. Data analysis was conducted from May 2019 to April 2021.

Exposures

Interval between advanced life support (ALS)-trained EMS personnel arrival at the scene and the first prehospital intravenous or intraosseous administration of epinephrine.

Main outcomes and measures

The primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. In each cohort of initial cardiac rhythms, patients who received epinephrine at any period (minutes) after EMS arrival at the scene were matched with patients who were at risk of receiving epinephrine within the same period using time-dependent propensity scores calculated from patient demographic characteristics, arrest characteristics, and EMS interventions.

Results

Of 41 079 eligible individuals (median [interquartile range] age, 67 [55-79] years), 26 579 (64.7%) were men. A total of 10 088 individuals (24.6%) initially had shockable cardiac rhythms, and 30 991 (75.4%) had nonshockable rhythms. Those who received epinephrine included 8223 patients (81.5%) with shockable cardiac rhythms and 27 901 (90.0%) with nonshockable rhythms. In the shockable cardiac rhythm cohort, the risk ratio (RR) for receipt of epinephrine with survival to hospital discharge was highest between 0 and 5 minutes after EMS arrival (1.12; 95% CI, 0.99-1.26) across the categorized timing of the administration of epinephrine by 5-minute intervals after EMS arrival; however, that finding was not statistically significant. Treating the timing of epinephrine administration as a continuous variable, the RR for survival to hospital discharge decreased 5.5% (95% CI, 3.4%-7.5%; P < .001 for the interaction between epinephrine administration and time to matching) per minute after EMS arrival. In the nonshockable cardiac rhythm cohort, the RR for the association of receipt of epinephrine with survival to hospital discharge was the highest between 0 and 5 minutes (1.28; 95% CI, 0.95-1.72), although not statistically significant, and decreased 4.4% (95% CI, 0.8%-7.9%; P for interaction = .02) per minute after EMS arrival.

Conclusions and relevance

Among adults with OHCA, survival to hospital discharge differed across the timing of epinephrine administration and decreased with delayed administration for both shockable and nonshockable rhythms.

SUBMITTER: Okubo M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8356068 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundCardiac arrest guidelines recommend epinephrine every 3-5 minutes during cardiac arrest resuscitation. However, it is unclear if multiple epinephrine doses are associated with improved outcomes. The objective of this study was to determine if a single-dose epinephrine protocol was associated with improved survival compared to traditional multidose protocols.MethodsWe conducted a pre-post study across five North Carolina EMS agencies from 11/1/2016 to 10/29/2019. Patients ≥18 years old with attempted resuscitation for non-traumatic prehospital cardiac arrest were included. Data were collected 1 year before and after implementation of the single-dose epinephrine protocol. Prior to implementation, all agencies used a multidose epinephrine protocol. The Cardiac Arrest Registry to Enhance Survival (CARES) was used to obtain patient outcomes. Study outcomes were survival to hospital discharge (primary) and return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Analysis was by intention to treat. Outcomes were compared pre- vs. post-implementation using generalized estimating equations to account for clustering within EMS agencies. Adjusted analyses included age, sex, race, shockable vs. non-shockable rhythm, witnessed arrest, automatic external defibrillator availability, EMS response interval, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.ResultsDuring the study period there were 1,690 encounters (899 pre- and 791 post-implementation). The population was 74.7% white, 61.1% male, and had a median age of 65 (IQR 53-76) years. Survival to hospital discharge was similar pre- vs. post-implementation [13.6% (122/899) vs. 15.4% (122/791); OR 1.19, 95%CI 0.89-1.59]. However, ROSC was more common post-implementation [42.3% (380/899) vs. 32.5% (257/791); OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.54-0.81]. After adjusting for covariates, the single-dose protocol was associated with similar survival to discharge rates (aOR 0.88, 95%CI 0.77-1.29), but with decreased ROSC rates (aOR 0.58, 95%CI 0.47-0.72).ConclusionA prehospital single-dose epinephrine protocol was associated with similar survival to hospital discharge, but decreased ROSC rates compared to the traditional multidose epinephrine protocol.

Project description:ImportanceDrug overdose (OD) is a public health challenge and an important cause of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Existing studies evaluating OD-related OHCA (OD-OHCA) either aggregate all drugs or focus on opioids. The epidemiology, presentation, and outcomes of drug-specific OHCA are largely unknown.ObjectiveTo evaluate the temporal pattern, clinical presentation, care, and outcomes of adult patients with OHCA overall and according to the drug-specific profile.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study of adults with OHCA in King County Washington was conducted between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Etiology of OHCA was determined using emergency medical service, hospital, and medical examiner records. Etiology was classified as non-OD OHCA or OD-OHCA, with drug-specific profiles categorized as (1) opioid without stimulant, (2) stimulant without opioid, (3) opioid and stimulant, or (4) all other nonstimulant, nonopioid drugs. Statistical analysis was performed on July 1, 2023.ExposureOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was survival to hospital discharge. The secondary outcome was survival with favorable functional status defined by Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2 based on review of the hospital record.ResultsIn this cohort study, there were 6790 adult patients with emergency medical services-treated OHCA from a US metropolitan system. During the 7-year study period, there were 702 patients with OD-OHCA (median age, 41 years [IQR, 29-53 years]; 64% male [n = 450] and 36% female [n = 252]) and 6088 patients with non-OD OHCA (median age, 66 years [IQR, 56-77 years]; 65% male [n = 3944] and 35% female [n = 2144]). The incidence of OD-OHCA increased from 5.2 (95% CI, 3.8-6.6) per 100 000 person-years in 2015 to 13.0 (95% CI, 10.9-15.1) per 100 000 person-years in 2021 (P < .001 for trend), whereas there was no significant temporal change in the incidence of non-OD OHCA (P = .30). OD-OHCA were more likely to be unwitnessed (66% [460 of 702] vs 41% [2515 of 6088]) and less likely to be shockable (8% [56 of 702] vs 25% [1529 of 6088]) compared with non-OD OHCA. Unadjusted survival was not different (20% [138 of 702] for OD vs 18% [1095 of 6088] for non-OD). When stratified by drug profile, combined opioid-stimulant OHCA demonstrated the greatest relative increase in incidence. Presentation and outcomes differed by drug profile. Patients with stimulant-only OHCA were more likely to have a shockable rhythm (24% [31 of 129]) compared with patients with opioid-only OHCA (4% [11 of 295]) or patients with combined stimulant-opioid OHCA 5% [10 of 205]), and they were more likely to have a witnessed arrest (50% [64 of 129]) compared with patients with OHCA due to other drugs (19% [14 of 73]) or patients with combined stimulant-opioid OHCA (23% [48 of 205]). Patients with a combined opioid-stimulant OHCA had the lowest survival to hospital discharge (10% [21 of 205]) compared with patients with stimulant-only OHCA (22% [29 of 129]) or patients with OHCA due to other drugs (26% [19 of 73]), a difference that persisted after multivariable adjustment.Conclusions and relevanceIn a population-based cohort study, the incidence of OD-OHCA increased significantly from 2015 to 2021, with the greatest increase observed among patients with a combined stimulant-opioid OHCA. Presentation and outcome differed according to the drug-specific profile. The combination of increasing incidence and lower survival among among patients with a opioid-stimulant OHCA supports prevention and treatment initiatives that consider the drug-specific profile.

Project description:For patients with in-hospital cardiac arrests attributable to nonshockable rhythms, delays in epinephrine administration beyond 5 minutes is associated with worse survival. However, the extent of hospital variation in delayed epinephrine administration and its effect on hospital-level outcomes is unknown.Within Get With The Guidelines-Resuscitation, we identified 103?932 adult patients (?18 years) at 548 hospitals with an in-hospital cardiac arrest attributable to a nonshockable rhythm who received at least 1 dose of epinephrine between 2000 and 2014. We constructed 2-level hierarchical regression models to quantify hospital variation in rates of delayed epinephrine administration (>5 minutes) and its association with hospital rates of survival to discharge and survival with functional recovery.Overall, 13?213 (12.7%) patients had delays to epinephrine, and this rate varied markedly across hospitals (range, 0%-53.8%). The odds of delay in epinephrine administration were 58% higher at 1 randomly selected hospital in comparison with a similar patient at another randomly selected hospital (median odds ratio, 1.58; 95% confidence interval, 1.51-1.64). The median risk-standardized survival rate was 12.0% (range, 5.4%-31.9%), and the risk-standardized survival with functional recovery was 7.4% (range, 0.9%-30.8%). There was an inverse correlation between a hospital's rate of delayed epinephrine administration and its risk-standardized rate of survival to discharge (?=-0.22, P<0.0001) and survival with functional recovery (?=-0.14, P=0.001). In comparison with a median survival rate of 12.9% (interquartile range, 11.1%-15.4%) at hospitals in the lowest quartile of epinephrine delay, risk-standardized survival was 16% lower at hospitals in the quartile with the highest rate of epinephrine delays (10.8%; interquartile range, 9.7%-12.7%).Delays in epinephrine administration following in-hospital cardiac arrest are common and variy across hospitals. Hospitals with high rates of delayed epinephrine administration had lower rates of overall survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest attributable to nonshockable rhythm. Further studies are needed to determine whether improving hospital performance on time to epinephrine administration, especially at hospitals with poor performance on this metric, will lead to improved outcomes.