Dataset Information

Comprehensive evaluation of microneedle-based intradermal adalimumab delivery vs. subcutaneous administration: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

ABSTRACT:

Aims

To evaluate feasibility of intradermal (i.d.) adalimumab administration using hollow microneedles, and to compare a single i.d. dose of adalimumab using a hollow microneedle with a single subcutaneous (s.c.) dose using a conventional needle.

Methods

In this single-centre double-blind, placebo-controlled, double-dummy clinical trial in 24 healthy adults we compared 40 mg adalimumab (0.4 mL) administered i.d. using a hollow microneedle with a s.c. dose using a conventional needle. Primary parameters were pain, acceptability and local tolerability; secondary parameters safety, pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. We explored usability of optical coherence tomography, clinical photography, thermal imaging, and laser speckle contrast imaging to evaluate skin reaction after i.d. injections. In vitro protein analysis was performed to assess compatibility of adalimumab with the hollow microneedle device.

Results

While feasible and safe, injection pain of i.d. adalimumab was higher compared to s.c. adalimumab (35.4 vs. 7.9 on a 100-point visual analogue scale). Initial absorption rate and relative bioavailability were higher after i.d. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 95 h [47-120]; F_rel = 129% [6.46%]) compared to s.c. adalimumab (time to maximum plasma concentration = 120 h [96-221]). Anti-adalimumab antibodies were detected in 50% and 83% of the subjects after i.d. and s.c. adalimumab, respectively. We observed statistically significantly more erythema and skin perfusion after i.d. adalimumab, compared to s.c. adalimumab and placebo injections (P < .0001). Cytokine secretion after whole blood lipopolysaccharide challenge was comparable between administration routes.

Conclusions

Intradermal injection of adalimumab using hollowing microneedles was perceived as more painful and less accepted than s.c. administration, but yields a higher relative bioavailability with similar safety and pharmacodynamic effects.

SUBMITTER: Jacobse J

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8359405 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionExisting HIV therapy using oral antiretrovirals (ARVs) can result in pill fatigue and sub-optimal adherence. Microneedle array patches (MAPs) offer non-invasive, blood-free and painless drug delivery, and may improve patient adherence. The objective of this study was to develop a novel physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model to simulate the systemic pharmacokinetics of cabotegravir and rilpivirine MAPs using the intradermal route.MethodsThe developed PBPK models were qualified against observed pharmacokinetic data after intramuscular (IM) and intradermal administration of long-acting nanoformulated rilpivirine to rats, and for IM administration of both drugs to healthy adults. Qualified models were then utilised to estimate suitable MAP characteristics (e.g. nanoformulation dose and release rates) and inform dosing strategies to maintain plasma concentrations above target trough concentrations for the designated dosing interval.ResultsPBPK models simulated q4-weekly loading and maintenance doses of 360 mg and 180 mg for long-acting formulated cabotegravir between the release rates of 1 × 10-3-3 × 10-3h-1 and 1 × 10-3-1.5 × 10-3h-1 respectively, for a 70 kg adult. Estimated patch size was 60 cm2 for a 360 mg dose of cabotegravir. For q4-weekly dosing, rilpivirine required a 1080 mg loading dose and a 540 mg maintenance dose with release rates of 1.5 × 10-3-2.5 × 10-3h-1 and 5 × 10-4-1 × 10-3h-1, respectively. Weekly dosing was also evaluated to assess the potential application from a smaller patch size. The ability to self-administer via a patch that is only left in place for a short duration makes longer durations less important than for some other long-acting approaches. Weekly cabotegravir required 60 mg between release rates 7 × 10-3-9 × 10-3h-1 and rilpivirine required 270 mg and 180 mg respectively between release rates of 7 × 10-3-9 × 10-3h-1.DiscussionThis model estimated optimal dose and release rates for cabotegravir and rilpivirine MAPs. Our approach provides a computational platform to support rational development of intradermal administration strategies to tackle problems associated with chronic oral ARV administration.