Dataset Information

Assessing the evidence on the differential impact of menthol versus non-menthol cigarette use on smoking cessation in the U.S. population: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The potential impact of menthol versus non-menthol cigarette use on smoking behaviors is an intensely scrutinized topic in the public health arena. To date, several general literature reviews have been conducted, but findings and conclusions have been discordant. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines to examine the Key Question, "Does menthol cigarette use have a differential impact on smoking cessation compared with non-menthol cigarette use?"

Methods

Six databases-Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, MEDLINE, Embase and PsycInfo-were queried from inception to June 12, 2020. Articles comparing menthol versus non-menthol cigarette smokers in terms of at least one predefined smoking cessation outcome were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality Evidence-Based Practice Center approach. A random-effects model utilizing the DerSimonian and Laird method to pool adjusted odds ratio was applied. Variations among pooled studies were assessed using Cochran's Q statistic, and heterogeneity was quantified using the inconsistency index (I²).

Results

Forty-three demographically adjusted studies (22 rated "good", 20 rated "fair", and one study rated "poor" individual study quality) comparing menthol and non-menthol smokers were qualitatively synthesized across the following measures (study count; strength of evidence): duration of abstinence (2; low); quit attempts (15; insufficient); rate of abstinence/quitting (29; moderate); change in smoking quantity/frequency (5; insufficient); and, return to smoking/relapse (2; insufficient). Overall, the qualitative synthesis failed to show a consistent trend for an association between menthol cigarette use and smoking cessation across outcomes. Meta-analyses found no difference between menthol and non-menthol cigarette use and either quit attempts or abstinence.

Conclusions

Given the lack of consistency or statistical significance in the findings-combined with a "low" overall strength of evidence grade, based on deficiencies of indirectness and inconsistency-no consistent or significant associations between menthol cigarette use and smoking cessation were identified. Recommendations for future studies include increased focus on providing longitudinal, adjusted data collected from standardized outcome measures of cessation to better inform long-term smoking cessation and menthol cigarette use. Such improvements should also be further considered in more methodologically rigorous systematic reviews characterized by objectivity, comprehensiveness, and transparency with the ultimate objective of better informing public health and policy decision making.

SUBMITTER: Kim MM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8359586 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:IntroductionCigarette smoking is disproportionately common among sexual minorities. While menthol market share has increased in the past decade, research on menthol cigarette smoking among sexual minorities is scant. For this study, we examined menthol cigarette smoking in the United States, by sex and sexual identity using a nationally representative sample of adults.Aims and methodsWe pooled data from the 2015-2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health. We used chi-square tests and multivariable logistic regression models to examine (1) past 30-day cigarette use, (2) past 30-day menthol use, and (3) menthol preference among adults who have smoked cigarettes in the past 30 days for the following groups: heterosexual/straight males, heterosexual/straight females, gay males, gay/lesbian females, bisexual males, and bisexual females. Data were analyzed in September 2020.ResultsBivariate analyses revealed that prevalence of cigarette smoking and menthol cigarette smoking were higher among sexual minorities compared with heterosexual respondents, and that preference for menthol was highest among lesbian/gay and bisexual females who smoke. Multivariable models showed that compared with heterosexual females who smoke, odds of menthol preference were lower among heterosexual/straight and bisexual males who smoke, and higher among bisexual females.ConclusionsOur study found that menthol preference was disproportionately high among sexual minorities who smoke-bisexual and gay/lesbian females who smoke in particular. Research is needed to understand why menthol use is common among sexual minorities who smoke.ImplicationsUsing data from a nationally representative study, this study makes a unique contribution to literature by identifying differences in menthol smoking between sexual minority subgroups. Specifically, we found that menthol smoking was highest among sexual minority females (ie, lesbian/gay and bisexual females) compared with other sexual minorities. These findings highlight the need for targeted interventions to prevent menthol cigarette initiation among sexual minorities, as well as to promote smoking cessation among sexual minorities who smoke menthol cigarettes, with an emphasis on sexual minority females. Future research should examine the impact of a potential menthol ban on these inequalities.