Dataset Information

Outcome of early-onset fetal growth restriction with or without abnormal umbilical artery Doppler flow.

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Early-onset fetal growth restriction is a pregnancy complication often coinciding with abnormal Doppler flow in the umbilical artery. Absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery is associated with adverse perinatal outcome. As the optimal management of this condition is unclear, the objective of this study was to analyze the time interval from admission to delivery of pregnancies with early-onset fetal growth restriction, while pursuing a policy of postponing delivery unless active management of labor would be required because of fetal distress or maternal condition. We also assessed short- and long-term perinatal outcome.

Material and methods

In this historical cohort study, all pregnant women with singleton pregnancies, admitted during 2004-2015 with early-onset fetal growth restriction were included. Pregnancies with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (AREDF) were compared with pregnancies with a positive end-diastolic Doppler flow (PEDF). Time until delivery was determined and perinatal outcome was assessed for both groups.

Results

In our study, 111 women were allocated to the PEDF group and 109 to the AREDF group. In the AREDF group, fetal distress was more often an indication for delivery, in comparison with the PEDF group (p = .004). Median time until delivery in patients admitted between 26 and 28 weeks' gestation was 6+5 weeks in the PEDF group and 1+4 weeks in the AREDF group (p = .001). No statistically significant difference was found between the Doppler groups in the composite adverse neonatal outcome, which includes at least one of the following outcomes: infant respiratory distress syndrome, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, necrotizing enterocolitis, intraventricular hemorrhage >grade 2, periventricular leukomalacia and perinatal death (p = .63).

Conclusions

In this study, comprising pregnancies with early-onset fetal growth restriction, fetal distress was observed more frequently in the AREDF group with the consequence of delivery at an earlier stage of gestation, compared with the PEDF group. AREDF was not associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality compared with PEDF.

SUBMITTER: Gairabekova D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8360092 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo describe the short- and long-term outcomes of infants with early-onset fetal growth restriction (FGR) and umbilical artery absent or reversed end-diastolic flow (AREDF), delivered before 30 weeks' gestation and managed proactively.MethodsThis was a retrospective cohort study of fetuses delivered for fetal indication before 30 completed weeks' gestation that had early-onset FGR (defined as estimated fetal weight more than 2 SD below the mean) with AREDF in the umbilical artery (FGR group), at the level-3 perinatal unit in Lund, Sweden, between 1998 and 2015. Perinatal outcome and neurodevelopment at ≥ 2 years of age in surviving infants were compared with those of a group of infants without small-for-gestational-age birth weight or any known fetal Doppler changes delivered before 30 weeks in Lund during the corresponding time period (non-FGR group). In the FGR group, the main indication for delivery was the Doppler finding of AREDF in the umbilical artery.ResultsThere were 139 fetuses (of which 26% were a twin/triplet) in the FGR group and 946 fetuses (of which 28% were a twin/triplet) in the non-FGR group. The FGR infants had a median birth weight of 630 g (range, 340-1165 g) and gestational age at birth of 187 days (range, 164-209 days), as compared with 950 g (range, 470-2194 g) and 185 days (range, 154-209 days), respectively, in the non-FGR group. The rate of fetal mortality did not differ between the two groups (5.0% and 5.4% in the FGR and non-FGR groups, respectively). All seven intrauterine deaths in the FGR group occurred before 26 weeks' gestation. In the FGR group compared with the non-FGR group, severe intraventricular hemorrhage was less frequent and bronchopulmonary dysplasia and septicemia were more frequent (P = 0.008, P < 0.001 and P = 0.017, respectively). In the FGR group, the survival rate at 2 years (83% of liveborn infants) and the rate of cerebral palsy (7%) did not differ significantly from those in the non-FGR group (82% and 8%, respectively). The rate of survival without neurodevelopmental impairment was higher in the non-FGR group (83%) than in the FGR group (62%) (P < 0.001), as well as in infants in the FGR group delivered at or after 26 weeks (72%) compared with those delivered before 26 weeks (40%) (P = 0.003). Within the FGR group, outcomes were similar between twins and singletons and, in those who survived beyond 2 years, outcomes were similar between fetuses with absent and those with reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery.ConclusionsInfants delivered very preterm after severe FGR with AREDF in the umbilical artery had a similar rate of survival as did non-FGR infants of corresponding gestational age; however, they were at higher risk of neurodevelopmental impairment, the risk being most pronounced following birth before 26 weeks. Gestational age remains an important factor associated with the prognosis of early-onset FGR; nevertheless, the present results support the hypothesis, which should be tested prospectively, that fetuses with early-onset FGR and umbilical artery AREDF may benefit from early intervention rather than expectant management, and that umbilical artery Doppler findings could be incorporated into clinical protocols for cases very early in gestation. © 2020 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Intrauterine growth restriction is defined as a fetal weight below the 10th percentile for a given gestational age and can be identified using umbilical artery Doppler velocimetry which is a non-invasive technique. The objective of this study was to determine the perinatal outcome of growth-restricted fetuses with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler study compared to those with normal umbilical artery Doppler waveforms at a tertiary referral hospital in Ethiopia. METHODS:A prospective cohort study was conducted among pregnant mothers with fetal growth restriction admitted for labour and delivery from September 2018-February 2019. The data were entered and analyzed using SPSS version 23. After conducting descriptive analysis, exploring the entire data, and checking for, statistical associations between abnormal umbilical artery Doppler and outcome variables, multiple logistic regression was conducted to control for confounders. RESULTS:A total of 170 pregnant mothers complicated with growth-restricted fetuses were included in the study, among which 133 were with normal umbilical artery Doppler studies and 37 were with abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies. Four (3%) of normal and 9(24.3%) of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler studies ended in perinatal death-value = 0.001. Twenty (15%) of normal and 24(64.9%) of abnormal umbilical artery Doppler study neonates required neonatal intensive care admission-value = 0.002. Growth restricted fetuses complicated with abnormal Doppler were two times more likely to require neonatal intensive care unit admissions compared to growth-restricted fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler flow, P-value 0.002, (OR = 2.059,95%CI 1.449-2.926). Growth restricted fetuses complicated with abnormal Doppler were four times more likely to end in early neonatal death compared to growth-restricted fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler flow, P-value 0.001, (OR = 4.136, 95%CI 3.423-4.998). However, the study is unmatched and there is a possibility of gestational age confounding the result and should be seen with the context of preterm morbidity and mortality. CONCLUSION:The abnormal umbilical artery Doppler waveform is associated with cesarean section delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal sepsis, neonatal hyperbilirubinemia, and early neonatal death compared to normal umbilical artery Doppler flow.

Project description:ObjectiveTo evaluate the relationship between Doppler and biometric ultrasound parameters measured at diagnosis and perinatal adverse outcome in a cohort of late-onset growth-restricted (FGR) fetuses.MethodsThis was a multicenter retrospective study of data obtained between 2014 and 2019 including non-anomalous singleton pregnancies complicated by late-onset FGR (≥ 32 weeks), which was defined either as abdominal circumference (AC) or estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 10th percentile for gestational age or as reduction of the longitudinal growth of AC by over 50 percentiles compared to ultrasound scan performed between 18 and 32 weeks of gestation. We evaluated the association between sonographic findings at diagnosis of FGR and composite adverse perinatal outcome (CAPO), defined as stillbirth or at least two of the following: obstetric intervention due to intrapartum fetal distress, neonatal acidemia, birth weight < 3rd percentile and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).ResultsOverall, 468 cases with complete biometric and umbilical, fetal middle cerebral and uterine artery (UtA) Doppler data were included, of which 53 (11.3%) had CAPO. On logistic regression analysis, only EFW percentile was associated independently with CAPO (P = 0.01) and NICU admission (P < 0.01), while the mean UtA pulsatility index (PI) multiples of the median (MoM) > 95th percentile at diagnosis was associated independently with obstetric intervention due to intrapartum fetal distress (P = 0.01). The model including baseline pregnancy characteristics and the EFW percentile was associated with an area under the receiver-operating-characteristics curve of 0.889 (95% CI, 0.813-0.966) for CAPO (P < 0.001). A cut-off value for EFW corresponding to the 3.95th percentile was found to discriminate between cases with and those without CAPO, yielding a sensitivity of 58.5% (95% CI, 44.1-71.9%), specificity of 69.6% (95% CI, 65.0-74.0%), positive predictive value of 19.8% (95% CI, 13.8-26.8%) and negative predictive value of 92.9% (95% CI, 89.5-95.5%).ConclusionsRetrospective data from a large cohort of late-onset FGR fetuses showed that EFW at diagnosis is the only sonographic parameter associated independently with the occurrence of CAPO, while mean UtA-PI MoM > 95th percentile at diagnosis is associated independently with intrapartum distress leading to obstetric intervention. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Project description:Introduction While stillbirth rates have declined in many countries, these declines are less marked in the UK. Fetal growth restriction (FGR) affects about 3% to 7% of all pregnancies and is by far the single strongest risk factor for stillbirth. FGR implies a pathological restriction of the genetic growth potential and is not synonymous with small-for-gestational age (SGA). The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) defines SGA as an estimated fetal weight (EFW) or abdominal circumference (AC) less than the 10th centile. The likelihood of FGR is higher in severe SGA defined as an EFW or AC less than the 3rd centile. The second version of Saving Babies' Lives Care Bundle (SBLCBv2) recommends the second trimester uterine artery Doppler (UtAD) pulsatility index (PI) screening for pregnancies at high risk of FGR. This study was aimed at determining the prevalence of FGR and assess pregnancy outcomes following the implementation of UtAD at the United Lincolnshire Hospitals NHS Trust (ULHT). Methods One-year retrospective cohort study (1st September 2020-31st August 2021) was conducted across both ULHT hospitals in the UK (Lincoln County Hospital in Lincoln and Pilgrim Hospital in Boston). Results During the study period, 5197 women were booked at ULHT. Of 5197, 349 were identified as high risk for FGR. When numbers were compared for the two hospitals, FGR rate was higher in Lincoln 8.10% vs. 4.51% in Boston. In addition, an increased proportion of abnormal UtAD scans was observed in Lincoln (35.7%) vs. in Boston (22%) (P = 0.014). Of the 349 UtAD scans, 237 were normal (67.9%), 41 showed unilateral notching (11.7%), 43 bilateral notching (12.3%), and 28 raised PI (8%). Babies in the bilateral notching group exhibited the lowest birth weight (P = 0.005), born at an earlier gestation (P = 0.029), and with low Apgar scores at 1 (P = 0.007) and 5 minutes (P < 0.001). Discussion. UtAD is a useful second trimester screening tool for women identified as high risk for FGR and helps stratify the intensity of surveillance. However, the findings call into question a focus solely on the UtAD PI for improving FGR detection without taking into account bilateral notching.

Project description:ObjectivesFirst, to compare published Doppler reference charts of the ratios of flow in the fetal middle cerebral and umbilical arteries (i.e. the cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) and umbilicocerebral ratio (UCR)). Second, to assess the association of thresholds of CPR and UCR based on these charts with short-term composite adverse perinatal outcome in a cohort of pregnancies considered to be at risk of late preterm fetal growth restriction.MethodsStudies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were searched for in PubMed. Formulae for plotting the median and the 10th percentile (for CPR) or the 90th percentile (for UCR) against gestational age were extracted from the publication or calculated from the published tables. Data from a prospective European multicenter observational cohort study of singleton pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction at 32 + 0 to 36 + 6 weeks' gestation, in which fetal arterial Doppler measurements were collected longitudinally, were used to compare the different charts. Specifically, the association of UCR and CPR thresholds (CPR < 10th percentile or UCR ≥ 90th percentile and multiples of the median (MoM) values) with composite adverse perinatal outcome was analyzed. The association was also compared between chart-based thresholds and absolute thresholds. Composite adverse perinatal outcome comprised both abnormal condition at birth and major neonatal morbidity.ResultsTen studies presenting reference charts for CPR or UCR were retrieved. There were large differences between the charts in the 10th and 90th percentile values of CPR and UCR, respectively, while median values were more similar. In the gestational-age range of 28-36 weeks, there was no relationship between UCR or CPR and gestational age. From the prospective observational study, 856 pregnancies at risk of late-onset preterm fetal growth restriction were included in the analysis. The association of abnormal UCR or CPR with composite adverse perinatal outcome was similar for percentile thresholds or MoM values, as calculated from the charts, and for absolute thresholds, both on univariable analysis and after adjustment for gestational age at measurement, estimated fetal weight MoM and pre-eclampsia. The adjusted odds ratio for composite adverse perinatal outcome was 3.3 (95% CI, 1.7-6.4) for an absolute UCR threshold of ≥ 0.9 or an absolute CPR threshold of < 1.11 (corresponding to ≥ 1.75 MoM), and 1.6 (95% CI, 0.9-2.9) for an absolute UCR threshold of ≥ 0.7 to < 0.9 or an absolute CPR threshold of ≥ 1.11 to < 1.43 (corresponding to ≥ 1.25 to < 1.75 MoM).ConclusionsIn the gestational-age range of 32 to 36 weeks, adjustment of CPR or UCR for gestational age is not necessary when assessing the risk of adverse outcome in pregnancies at risk of fetal growth restriction. The adoption of absolute CPR or UCR thresholds, independent of reference charts, is feasible and makes clinical assessment simpler than if using percentiles or other gestational-age normalized units. The high variability in percentile threshold values among the commonly used UCR and CPR reference charts hinders reliable diagnosis and clinical management of late preterm fetal growth restriction. © 2021 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.