Dataset Information

COVID-19 Impact on Interventional Pulmonology Training.

ABSTRACT: Background: The impact of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic extends beyond the realms of patient care and healthcare resource use to include medical education; however, the repercussions of COVID-19 on the quality of training and trainee perceptions have yet to be explored. Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the degree of interventional pulmonology (IP) fellows' involvement in the care of COVID-19 and its impact on fellows' clinical education, procedure skills, and postgraduation employment search. Methods: An internet-based survey was validated and distributed among IP fellows in North American fellowship training programs. Results: Of 40 eligible fellows, 38 (95%) completed the survey. A majority of fellows (76%) reported involvement in the care of patients with COVID-19. Fellows training in the Northeast United States reported involvement in the care of a higher number of patients with COVID-19 than in other regions (median, 30 [interquartile range, 20-50] vs. 10 [5-13], respectively; P < 0.01). Fifty-two percent of fellows reported redeployment outside IP during COVID-19, mostly into intensive care units. IP procedure volume decreased by 21% during COVID-19 compared with pre-COVID-19 volume. This decrease was mainly accounted for by a reduction in bronchoscopies. A majority of fellows (82%) reported retainment of outpatient clinics during COVID-19 with the transition from face-to-face to telehealth-predominant format. Continuation of academic and research activities during COVID-19 was reported by 86% and 82% of fellows, respectively. After graduation, all fellows reported having secured employment positions. Conclusion: Although IP fellows were extensively involved in the care of patients with COVID-19, most IP programs retained educational activities through the COVID-19 outbreak. The impact of the decrease in procedure volume on trainee competency would be best addressed individually within each training program. These data may assist in focusing efforts regarding the education of medical trainees during the current and future healthcare crises.

SUBMITTER: Kalchiem-Dekel O

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8362793 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveTo discuss and summarise the background and recent advances in the approach to bronchoscopic ablative therapies for lung cancer, focusing on focal parenchymal lesions.BackgroundThis series focusses on the challenges highlighted by increasing recognition of the prognostically more favourable oligometastatic disease rather than the more frequent, but prognostically poor, high tumour burden metastatic disease. While surgery, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), and trans-thoracic percutaneous ablative techniques such as microwave (MWA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are well recognised options for selected cases of pulmonary oligometastasis, bronchoscopic approaches to pulmonary tumour ablation are becoming realistic alternatives. An underlying tenet driving research and implementation in this domain is that percutaneous ablative techniques are obliged to traverse the pleura leading to a high rate of pneumothorax, and risks also goes up for peri-vascular lesions. Historically low yield bronchoscopic targeting of isolated peripheral tumors have significantly improved by incorporating multi-modality high resolution imaging and processing, including navigation planning and real-time image guidances (ultrasound, electromagnetic navigation, cone-beam CT). Combining advanced image guidance with ablative technology adaptations for bronchoscopic delivery opens up the options for high dose local ablative therapies that may reduce transthoracic complications and provide palliative to curative options for limited stage primary and oligometastatic diseases.MethodsWe conduct a narrative review of the literature summarizing the history of bronchoscopic tumor ablation approaches, technical details including biologic rational for their uses, and current evidence for each modality, as well as investigations into future applications. Because of the relative paucity of prospective studies, we have been very inclusive in our inclusion of experiences from the published clinical databases.ConclusionsWhilst surgical resection and SBRT remain the current mainstay of curative therapies for peripheral cancers, in the foreseeable future, developments and further research will see bronchoscopic ablative therapies become viable lung sparing alternatives in those deemed suitable. The future is bright.

Dataset Information

COVID-19 Impact on Interventional Pulmonology Training.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets