Dataset Information

Meridional Anisotropy of Foveal and Peripheral Resolution Acuity in Adults With Emmetropia, Myopia, and Astigmatism.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

To quantify astigmatism-related meridional anisotropy in visual resolution at central, nasal, and inferior visual fields.

Methods

Three groups of young adults (range, 18-30 years) with corrected-to-normal visual acuity (logMAR 0) were recruited: (1) myopic astigmats (MA): spherical-equivalent error (SE) < -0.75D, with-the-rule astigmatism ≥ 2.00D, n = 19; (2) simple myopes (SM): SE < -0.75D, astigmatism ≤ 0.50D, n = 20; and (3) emmetropes (EM): SE ± 0.50D, astigmatism ≤ 0.50D, n = 14. Resolution acuity was measured for the horizontal and vertical gratings at central and peripheral visual fields (eccentricity: 15°) using a 3-down 1-up staircase paradigm. On- and off-axis refractive errors were corrected by ophthalmic lenses.

Results

The MA group exhibited meridional anisotropy preferring vertical gratings. At the central field, the MA group had better resolution acuity for vertical than horizontal gratings, and their resolution acuity for horizontal gratings was significantly worse than the SM and EM groups. At peripheral visual fields, both the SM and EM groups showed better resolution acuity for the radial (i.e., nasal field: horizontal gratings; inferior field: vertical gratings) than tangential orientation. However, the MA group tended to have better resolution acuity for the tangential orientation (i.e., vertical gratings), and their resolution acuity for horizontal gratings was significantly lower than the SM and EM groups at the nasal field. No significant differences were found in the inferior field among the three groups.

Conclusions

This study provided evidence of astigmatism-related meridional anisotropy at the fovea and nasal visual fields, underscoring the significant impact of astigmatism on orientation-dependent visual functions.

SUBMITTER: Leung TW

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8363766 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:PurposeTo investigate the effect of visual adaptation to orientation-dependent optical blur on meridional contrast sensitivity function in artificially imposed astigmatism.MethodsThe study adopted a top-up adapt-test paradigm. During the blur adaptation process, the 18 non-astigmatic young adult participants were briefly presented with natural scene images (first trial, 10 minutes; subsequent trials, 6 seconds). Contrast sensitivities for horizontal and vertical gratings at spatial frequencies ranging from 1 to 8 cycles per degree (cpd) were measured immediately before and after adaptation to +3.00 diopters cylinder (DC) with-the-rule or against-the-rule astigmatism. Meridional anisotropy was measured to quantify the contrast sensitivity difference between the two grating orientations.ResultsAdapting to astigmatic blur enhanced contrast sensitivity at the blurred power meridian but reduced contrast sensitivity at the least affected axis meridian. In with-the-rule conditions, contrast sensitivity for horizontal gratings was significantly increased, whereas that for vertical gratings was significantly decreased. Similarly, in against-the-rule conditions, contrast sensitivity for vertical gratings was significantly increased, whereas that for horizontal gratings was significantly decreased. These two factors together resulted in a substantial systematic reduction, averaging 34%, in meridional anisotropy of contrast sensitivity across the spatial frequency spectrum.ConclusionsAstigmatism adaptation occurs in natural scene viewing. Brief exposure to astigmatic blur altered contrast sensitivity in the opposite direction at the two principal meridians, indicating that the mature visual system possesses functional plasticity to recalibrate the response characteristics of orientationally tuned cortical filters and thus promote substantial reductions of meridional anisotropy in astigmatic vision, to some extent counterbalancing the elongated oval shape of astigmatic blur.