Dataset Information

Using Online Simulation of Pediatric Musculoskeletal Cases to Evaluate How Knowledge of Costs Affects Diagnostic Workup.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Rising healthcare costs have emphasized the need to teach cost-conscious care in graduate medical education.

Objective

To teach high-value care and diagnostic evaluation of pediatric musculoskeletal complaints to residents and rotating medical students through online cases.

Methods

Six online cases were developed and tested at the University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center. Learners completed modules in one of two groups, those who saw itemized costs of diagnostic tests or those who did not. All learners completed a post-simulation survey. Measured outcomes included presumed diagnosis, cost of evaluation, tests ordered, and perceptions toward high-value care. Simulation outcomes were assessed using paired t-tests. Survey data was analyzed with Chi-squared tests. Outcomes separated by training year were analyzed using ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test.

Results

Thirty-nine residents and medical students participated and were randomly assigned to complete the cases with costs (n = 19) or no costs (n = 20) displayed during workup. Overall, learners who saw costs spent less money on diagnostics ($1511.11 mean per learner versus $2311.35, p = 0.01). Arrival at the correct diagnosis was associated with lower costs in 3 of 6 cases. When compared to the no cost group, learners in the costs group reported feeling more knowledgeable about the price of diagnostic tests (p = 0.04) and were more likely to factor costs into their practice moving forward (p = 0.03). Third year or above residents demonstrated a statically significant increase in correctly diagnosed cases as opposed to medical students.

Conclusions

Interventions that challenge learners to integrate costs into decision-making can potentially change future practice.

SUBMITTER: Yip AT

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8368963 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ObjectiveCare of the critically ill child is a rare but stressful event for emergency medical services (EMS) providers. Simulation training can improve resuscitation care and prehospital outcomes but limited access to experts, simulation equipment, and cost have limited adoption by EMS systems. Our objective was to form a statewide collaboration to develop, deliver, and evaluate a pediatric critical care simulation curriculum for EMS providers.MethodsWe describe a statewide collaboration between five academic centers to develop a simulation curriculum and deliver it to EMS providers. Cases were developed by the collaborating PEM faculty, reviewed by EMS regional directors, and based on previously published EMS curricula, a statewide needs assessment, and updated state EMS protocols. The simulation curriculum was comprised of 3 scenarios requiring recognition and acute management of critically ill infants and children. The curriculum was implemented through 5 separate education sessions, led by a faculty lead at each site, over a 6 month time period. We evaluated curriculum effectiveness with a prospective, interventional, single-arm educational study using pre-post assessment design to assess the impact on EMS provider knowledge and confidence. To assess the intervention effect on knowledge scores while accounting for nested data, we estimated a mixed effects generalized regression model with random effects for region and participant. We assessed for knowledge retention and self-reported practice change at 6 months post-curriculum. Qualitative analysis of participants' written responses immediately following the curriculum and at 6 month follow-up was performed using the framework method.ResultsOverall, 78 emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and 109 paramedics participated in the curriculum over five separate sessions. Most participants were male (69%) and paramedics (58%). One third had over 15 years of clinical experience. In the regression analysis, mean pediatric knowledge scores increased by 9.8% (95% CI: 7.2%, 12.4%). Most (93% [95% CI: 87.2%, 96.5%]) participants reported improved confidence caring for pediatric patients. Though follow-up responses were limited, participants who completed follow up surveys reported they had used skills acquired during the curriculum in clinical practice.ConclusionThrough statewide collaboration, we delivered a pediatric critical care simulation curriculum for EMS providers that impacted participant knowledge and confidence caring for pediatric patients. Follow-up data suggest that knowledge and skills obtained as part of the curriculum was translated into practice. This strategy could be used in future efforts to integrate simulation into EMS practice.