Dataset Information

Trial design and pilot phase results of a cluster-randomised intervention trial to improve stroke care after hospital discharge - The structured ambulatory post-stroke care program (SANO).

ABSTRACT:

Introduction

Previous studies showed insufficient control of cardiovascular risk factors (CVRF) and high stroke recurrence rates among ischemic stroke patients in Germany. Currently, no structured secondary prevention program exists in clinical routine. We present the trial design and pilot phase results of a complex intervention to improve stroke care after hospital discharge in Germany.

Patients and methods

SANO is a cluster-randomized trial with 30 participating regions across Germany aiming to enrol 2,790 patients (drks.de, DRKS00015322). Study intervention combines both structural and patient-centred elements. Study development was based on the Medical Research Council framework for complex interventions. In 15 intervention regions, a cross-sectoral multidisciplinary network is established to enhance CVRF control as well as detection and treatment of post-stroke complications. Recommendations on CVRF are based on high-quality secondary prevention guidelines. Study physicians use motivational interviewing and agree with patients on therapeutic targets. While hospitalised, patients also receive dietary counselling and a health-passport to track their progress. During regular visits, CVRF management and potential complications are monitored. The intervention is compared to 15 regions providing usual care. The primary endpoint is the combination of recurrent stroke, myocardial infarction and death assessed 12 months after enrolment and adjudicated in a blinded manner.

Results

Eighteen patients were enrolled in a pilot phase that demonstrated feasibility of patient recruitment and study procedures.

Conclusion

SANO is investigating a program to reduce outcome events after ischemic stroke by implementing a complex intervention. If successful, the program may be implemented in routine care on national level in Germany.

SUBMITTER: Eichner FA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8370073 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:There are challenges to timely adoption of, and ongoing adherence to, evidence-based practices known to improve patient care in the intensive care unit (ICU). Quality improvement initiatives using a collaborative network approach may increase the use of such practices. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of a novel knowledge translation program for increasing the proportion of patients who appropriately receive the following six evidence-based care practices: venous thromboembolism prophylaxis; ventilator-associated pneumonia prevention; spontaneous breathing trials; catheter-related bloodstream infection prevention; decubitus ulcer prevention; and early enteral nutrition.We will conduct a pragmatic cluster randomized active control trial in 15 community ICUs and one academic ICU in Ontario, Canada. The intervention is a multifaceted videoconferenced educational and problem-solving forum to organize knowledge translation strategies, including comparative audit and feedback, educational sessions from content experts, and dissemination of algorithms. Fifteen individual ICUs (clusters) will be randomized to receive quality improvement interventions targeting one of the best practices during each of six study phases. Each phase lasts four months during the first study year and three months during the second. At the end of each study phase, ICUs are assigned to an intervention for a best practice not yet received according to a random schedule. The primary analysis will use patient-level process-of-care data to measure the intervention's effect on rates of adoption and adherence of each best practice in the targeted ICU clusters versus controls.This study design evaluates a new system for knowledge translation and quality improvement across six common ICU problems. All participating ICUs receive quality improvement initiatives during every study phase, improving buy-in. This study design could be considered for other quality improvement interventions and in other care settings.