Dataset Information

Acute cardiac manifestations under immune checkpoint inhibitors-beware of the obvious: a case report.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized the management of many cancer types by drastically improving the median survival rate of patients. However, this efficiency comes at the cost of a high rate of immune-related adverse events, including lethal cardiac manifestations. Rapidly fatal cases of ICI-induced myocarditis have been reported and drawn considerable attention over the past years. However, it is essential to bear in mind that not all cardiac events occurring under ICI therapy are necessarily myocarditis.

Case summary

A 61-year-old female treated with pembrolizumab for a stage IV melanoma was admitted for chest pain leading to the diagnosis of ICI-related myocarditis based on the description of a discrete left ventricular subepicardial late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging. ICI were suspended and intravenous methylprednisolone initiated. A second line anti-MEK therapy was initiated. After a month of treatment, similar chest pain occurred. CMR revealed a midventricular stress cardiomyopathy and no LGE was detected. A posteriori interrogation revealed emotional stressors preceding both episodes. Review of the first CMR, performed 2 weeks after symptom onset, indicated a pattern compatible with the recovery phase of a stress cardiomyopathy and the presence of LGE was questioned. ICI were reintroduced without recurrence of cardiac events.

Discussion

Not all cardiac manifestations occurring under ICI therapy are drug-related adverse events, therefore differential diagnoses must systematically be considered as the contraindication of ICI may have a major impact on patient prognosis. Cardiac imaging should be performed early and plays a key role in the management strategy.

SUBMITTER: Arangalage D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8374985 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the setting of liver transplant (LT) pose a risk of rejection and hold unclear benefit in both the neoadjuvant (pre-transplant) and post-transplant salvage setting. In the pre-transplant setting, neoadjuvant ICIs may serve as a bridge to LT by downstaging disease burden to fit within transplant criteria. Outcomes in this setting include patients who had successful transplants without complications to patients who suffered severe complications, including fatal hepatic necrosis and graft failure requiring re-transplant. Some authors suggest having a period of three months between checkpoint inhibition and transplant may help mitigate adverse effects. In the post-LT setting, there are few treatment options if there is a recurrence of disease, which forces treatment teams to reconsider checkpoint inhibitors. Again, a longer period of time between transplant and checkpoint inhibition may reduce risk of rejection. Case reports of patients treated with ICIs post-transplant utilized either nivolumab or pembrolizumab. As combination atezolizumab/bevacizumab is a relatively new treatment option for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there are only three reported cases using this combination in the post-LT setting. While there were no cases of rejection, all three cases had progression of disease. As immunotherapy joins transplantation as a mainstay of treatment for HCC, it remains unclear how to best navigate when the treatment course involves both immune activation and immunosuppression.Case descriptionPatients who had an LT and were treated with ICIs (pre or post LT) at the University of Cincinnati were included in this retrospective chart review.ConclusionsFatal rejection remains a significant risk even 4 years after LT. Neoadjuvant ICIs also pose a risk for acute cellular rejection; however, this may not always be clinically significant. Graft versus host disease (GVHD) may be an additional, previously unreported risk of ICIs in the setting of LT. Prospective studies are needed to understand benefits and risks of checkpoint inhibitors in the LT setting.