Dataset Information

Left Atrial Hypertension, Electrical Conduction Slowing, and Mechanical Dysfunction - The Pathophysiological Triad in Atrial Fibrillation-Associated Atrial Cardiomyopathy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common arrhythmia and a significant burden for healthcare systems worldwide. Presence of relevant atrial cardiomyopathy (ACM) is related to persistent AF and increased arrhythmia recurrence rates after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI).

Objective

To investigate the association of left atrial pressure (LAP), left atrial electrical [invasive atrial activation time (IAAT) and amplified p-wave duration (aPWD)] and mechanical [left atrial emptying fraction (LA-EF) and left atrial strain (LAS)] functional parameters with the extent of ACM and their impact on arrhythmia recurrence following PVI.

Materials and methods

Fifty patients [age 67 (IQR: 61-75) years, 78% male] undergoing their first PVI for persistent AF were prospectively included. LAP (maximum amplitude of the v-wave), digital 12-lead electrocardiogram, echocardiography and high-density endocardial contact mapping were acquired in sinus rhythm prior to PVI. Arrhythmia recurrence was assessed using 72-hour Holter electrocardiogram at 6 and 12 months post PVI.

Results

Relevant ACM (defined as left atrial low-voltage extent ≥2 cm² at <0.5 mV threshold) was diagnosed in 25/50 (50%) patients. Compared to patients without ACM, patients with ACM had higher LAP [17.6 (10.6-19.5) mmHg with ACM versus 11.3 (7.9-14.0) mmHg without ACM (p = 0.009)]. The corresponding values for the electrical parameters were 166 (149-181) ms versus 139 (131-143) ms for IAAT (p < 0.0001), 163 (154-176) ms versus 148 (136-152) ms for aPWD on surface-ECG (p < 0.0001) and for the mechanical parameters 27.0 (17.5-37.0) % versus 41.0 (35.0-45.0) % for LA-EF in standard 2D-echocardiography (p < 0.0001) and 15.2 (11.0-21.2) % versus 29.4 (24.9-36.6) % for LAS during reservoir phase (p < 0.0001). Furthermore, all parameters showed a linear correlation with ACM extent (p < 0.05 for all). Receiver-operator-curve-analysis demonstrated a LAP ≥12.4 mmHg [area under the curve (AUC): 0.717, sensitivity: 72%, and specificity: 60%], a prolonged IAAT ≥143 ms (AUC: 0.899, sensitivity: 84%, and specificity: 80%), a prolonged aPWD ≥153 ms (AUC: 0.860, sensitivity: 80%, and specificity: 79%), an impaired LA-EF ≤33% (AUC: 0.869, sensitivity: 84%, and specificity: 72%), and an impaired LAS during reservoir phase ≤23% (AUC: 0.884, sensitivity: 84%, and specificity: 84%) as predictors for relevant ACM. Arrhythmia recurrence within 12 months post PVI was significantly increased in patients with relevant ACM ≥2 cm², electrical dysfunction with prolonged IAAT ≥143 ms and mechanical dysfunction with impaired LA-EF ≤33% (66 versus 20, 50 versus 23 and 55 versus 25%, all p < 0.05).

Conclusion

Left atrial hypertension, electrical conduction slowing and mechanical dysfunction are associated with ACM. These findings improve the understanding of ACM pathophysiology and may be suitable for risk stratification for new-onset AF, arrhythmia recurrence following PVI, and development of novel therapeutic strategies to prevent AF and its associated complications.

SUBMITTER: Eichenlaub M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8375593 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is the gold standard for assessing left atrial appendage (LAA) mechanic and thrombosis (LAAT); however, TEE is a high-risk procedure for viral transmission during coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. We investigated whether deformation indices of left atrium (LA) at transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) correlate with those of LAA assessed by TEE in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients undergoing electrical cardioversion (ECV). Consecutive patients with NVAF of ≥ 48 h or unknown duration, who underwent TEE and TTE at our Institution before ECV were retrospectively investigated. Standard echo-Doppler and LA and LAA myocardial strain and strain rate parameters were analyzed. A total of 115 NVAF patients (71.3 ± 8.1 yr/o, 59.1% men) were included: LAAT was diagnosed in 25 (21.7%) patients. Compared to patients without LAAT, those with LAAT had significantly higher CHA2DS2-VASc Risk score (4.5 ± 1.4 vs. 3.5 ± 1.1, p < 0.001), and lower ejection fraction (46.0 ± 14.8 vs. 57.6 ± 8.6%, p < 0.001). In LAAT patients, global strain of LA (8.7 ± 2.6 vs. 16.3 ± 4.5%, p < 0.001) and LAA (7.0 ± 1.7 vs. 11.7 ± 2.0%, p < 0.001) was significantly reduced compared to non-LAAT patients. A close relationship between left atrial strain reservoir (LASr) and LAA-global strain was demonstrated (r = 0.81). By univariable analysis, CHA2DS2-VASc Risk Score (OR 2.01, 95%CI 1.34-3.00), NT-proBNP (OR 1.36, 95%CI 1.19-1.54), ejection fraction (OR 0.92, 95%CI 0.88-0.96), E/e' ratio (OR 2.07, 95%CI 1.51-2.85), and LASr (OR 0.39, 95%CI 0.25-0.62) were strongly associated with LAAT presence at TEE. By multivariable analysis, only LASr (OR 0.40, 95%CI 0.24-0.70) retained statistical significance. ROC curve analysis revealed that an LASr cut-off value ≤ 9.3% had 98.9% sensibility and 100% specificity to identify LAAT by TEE (AUC = 0.98). In patients with NVAF of ≥ 48 h or unknown duration, scheduled to undergo ECV, LA deformation assessment by TTE might substitute invasive measurement of LAA function by TEE, simplifying diagnostic approach and possibly contributing to reduce COVID-19 infection diffusion.

Project description:BackgroundSurgical left atrial appendage occlusion (SLAAO) may be associated with a lower risk of thromboembolism in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing cardiac surgery. However, evidence regarding the effectiveness of SLAAO in patients undergoing mechanical heart valve replacement (MHVR) is lacking. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association between SLAAO and the cardiovascular outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing MHVR.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed data for 497 patients with atrial fibrillation; 27.6% of the patients underwent SLAAO, and the remainder of the patients did not (No-SLAAO group). The primary outcome was a composite of ischemic stroke, systemic embolism, and all-cause mortality. Cumulative event-free survival rates were estimated using Kaplan-Meier curves, and we performed multivariate Cox analyses to evaluate the association between SLAAO and outcomes. We used one-to-one propensity score matching to balance patients' baseline characteristics, and analyzed 120 matching pairs.ResultsFive patients died within 30 days postoperatively, and there were no significant differences between the two groups regarding in-hospital complications (all P > 0.05). After a median follow-up of 14 months, 14 primary events occurred. Kaplan-Meier curves showed no difference in the cumulative incidence of freedom from the primary outcome (log-rank P = 0.830), hemorrhagic events (log-rank P = 0.870), and the secondary outcome (log-rank P = 0.730), between the two groups. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed no association between SLAAO and any outcome (all P > 0.05). After propensity score matching, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, and the postoperative length of stay were significantly longer in the SLAAO group (all P < 0.05); results were similar to the unadjusted analyses.ConclusionsConcomitant SLAAO and MHVR was associated with longer length of stay, and cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamp time, but was not associated with additional protective effects against thromboembolic events and mortality during the 14-month follow-up.