Dataset Information

Virtual Coordinate System in Unicoronal Synostosis.

ABSTRACT: We propose a landmark-based, virtual coordinate system, specifically designed for assessment of asymmetrical craniofacial anatomy associated with unicoronal synostosis.

Method

CT scans of 33 patients with nonsyndromic unicoronal synostosis were included. Proposed mid-sagittal plane was compared with commonly used sagittal planes: (1) nasion, sella, and basion (N-S-BA); (2) midplane of bilateral frontozygomatic sutures (midFZ); and (3) the skull gravity center plane, to evaluate reliability and validity in the assessments of the anterior and posterior skull base.

Results

The proposed midplane is similar to the midFZ plane in describing the direction of the anterior skull base. However, it has less bias than the N-S-BA (P < 0.001), and the gravity center planes (P < 0.001). The proposed midplane measures the direction of the posterior skull base plane, similar to the midFZ and gravity center planes, but it has less measurement deviation than the N-S-BA plane (P < 0.001). The most protrusive point on the frontal bone in unicoronal patients is contralateral to the fused suture and distant from the mid-sagittal plane by 13.93 ± 4.01 mm. In addition, it is more anteriorly positioned, by 5.32 mm (P < 0.001), when compared with the corresponding point on the synostotic side. The uppermost point of the supraorbital rim on the synostotic side is cephalic to that of the contralateral side by 4.09 mm (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Prioritized orientation of an averaged Frankfort horizontal plane, followed by the location of the mid-sagittal and coronal planes, can generate a reliable and valid coordinate framework for the assessment of asymmetric skull shape in unicoronal synostosis.

SUBMITTER: Lu X

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8376362 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundInterpretation of shoulder motion across studies has been complicated due to the use of numerous scapular coordinate systems in the literature. Currently, there are no simple means by which to compare scapular kinematics between coordinate system definitions when data from only one coordinate system is known.Research questionHow do scapular kinematics vary based on the choice of coordinate system and can average rotation matrices be used to accurately convert kinematics between scapular local coordinate systems?MethodsAverage rotation matrices derived from anatomic landmarks of 51 cadaver scapulae (29 M/22 F; 59 ± 13 yrs; 26R/25 L; 171 ± 11 cm; 70 ± 19 kg; 23.7 ± 5.5 kg/m2) were generated between three common scapular coordinate systems. Absolute angle of rotation was used to determine if anatomical variability within the cadaver population influenced the matrices. To quantify the predictive capability to convert kinematics between the three coordinate systems, the average rotation matrices were applied to scapulothoracic motion data collected from 19 human subjects (10 M/9 F; 43 ± 17 yrs; 19R; 173 ± 9 cm; 71 ± 16 kg; 23.6 ± 4.5 kg/m2) using biplane fluoroscopy. Root mean squared error (RMSE) was used to compare kinematics from an original coordinate system to the kinematics expressed in each alternative coordinate system.ResultsThe choice of scapular coordinate system resulted in mean differences in scapulothoracic rotation of up to 23°, with overall different shapes and/or magnitudes of the curves. A single average rotation matrix between any two coordinate systems achieved accurate conversion of scapulothoracic kinematics to within 4° of RMSE of the known solution. The average rotation matrices were independent of sex, side, decomposition sequence, and motion.SignificanceScapulothoracic kinematic representations vary in shape and magnitude based solely on the choice of local coordinate system. The results of this study enhance interpretability and reproducibility in expressing scapulothoracic motion data between laboratories by providing a simple means to convert data between common coordinate systems. This is necessitated by the variety of available motion analysis techniques and their respective scapular landmark definitions.