Dataset Information

A bibliometric analysis of research on the treatment of facial nerve palsy.

ABSTRACT:

Background

There are various treatments for facial nerve palsy, and research into this topic is ongoing. In the present study, we carried out bibliometric and visualized analyses to identify the trends of research into facial nerve palsy treatment.

Methods

To identify articles, the SCOPUS database was searched for articles published from its inception to December 27, 2020. The search was conducted twice, with Search 1 investigating general treatment trends and Search 2 narrowing the scope to complementary and alternative treatment. The extracted keywords were analyzed using the Visualization Of Similarities (VOS) viewer. Through analysis of keywords, research hotspots in the treatment of facial nerve palsy were identified.

Results

A total of 1609 and 223 articles were identified in Searches 1 and 2, respectively. The number of articles published each year showed a tendency to increase, and most of the studies were only conducted in a few countries. In terms of subject area, "medicine" was overwhelmingly the most common(77.6%). Based on the analysis of 316 keywords in Search1, "medication treatment," and "complementary and alternative treatment" were the hotspots of research.

Conclusion

This study provides the overall trends of facial nerve palsy treatment. To date, research on medication treatment has been main focus, and antiviral use among medication treatment and complementary and alternative treatment has emerged in recent years.

SUBMITTER: Goo B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8376370 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background There has been lot of speculation around the possible side effects associated with COVID vaccination and incidence of facial palsy is one of them. Bilateral facial palsy is less likely to be idiopathic as compared to unilateral facial nerve palsy and warrants further investigations to find any secondary cause. COVID 19 infection and the vaccinations for the same are also included in the unique list of differentials. Case report We report an interesting case of bilateral rapidly sequential facial nerve palsy following the administration of COVID vaccination that showed subsequent improvement. We provide literature review to report the current incidence of same, secondary to the vaccination as well the infection itself Case presentation Following the introduction of COVID 19 vaccine, there have been reports of various cranial nerve involvement including lower motor neuron type facial paresis. Bilateral facial palsy is less likely to be idiopathic as compared to unilateral palsy(23% vs 70%) and requires further work up to determine the etiology before determining to be idiopathic. Unilateral facial palsy(FP) has been reported in the Phase I and II trials for Pfizer and Moderna vaccine, with a total of 7 cases reported in these initial trials. To date, there is no direct evidence that these vaccines have increased the incidence of facial palsy as compared to adverse events reported with other vaccines or compared to COVID 19 infection itself. We report a unique case of bilateral lower motor neuron type facial palsy noted in a young male within hours of receiving the vaccine that later improved with treatment. Reports of simultaneous bilateral facial palsy after vaccine are rare with only few cases reported to date in literature. Conclusion In conclusion from current available literature, we would like to postulate that though there is a risk of facial nerve palsy following the vaccination, it is comparable to the risks associated with any other vaccinations and not been higher than the non-vaccinated population. The overall risk is higher with the actual COVID 19 infection itself as compared to the vaccine.