Dataset Information

Dimensional compatibility and limitations of tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices: a mannequin-based in vitro study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation through supraglottic airway devices (SGAs) is a well-established element of difficult intubation algorithms. Success can be limited by dimensional incompatibilities between tracheal tubes (TTs) and SGAs.

Methods

In this in vitro study, we tested the feasibility of TT passage through SGAs, removal of SGAs over TTs, and the ability to guide the flexible bronchoscope with 13 TT brands (internal diameter, 6.5-8.0 mm) and ten different SGAs (#4 and #5) in an intubation mannequin.

Results

We tested 1,040 combinations of SGAs and TTs. Tracheal tube passage failed in 155 (30%) combinations of the five tested first-generation SGAs (117 [46%] with SGA #4, 38 [15%] with SGA #5) and in three (0.6%) combinations of the five tested second-generation SGAs (two [0.8%] with SGA #4 and one [0.4%] with SGA #5). The reason for failed passage of a TT through a first-generation SGA consistently was a too-narrow SGA connector. Removal of the SGA over the TT in the 882 remaining combinations was impossible for all sizes of reinforced TTs, except the Parker Reinforced TT, and was possible for all non-reinforced TTs. Only one combination with SGA #4 and 84 combinations with SGA #5 were not ideal to adequately guide the flexible bronchoscope.

Conclusion

Clinically relevant combinations of adult-size TTs and SGAs can be incompatible, rendering flexible bronchoscope-guided tracheal intubation through an SGA impossible. Additional limitations exist regarding removal of the SGA and maneuverability of the flexible bronchoscope.

SUBMITTER: Moser B

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8376698 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Supraglottic airway devices (SGA) are commonly used in pediatric anesthesia and serve as primary or back-up devices for difficult airway management. Most SGA are marketed without proper clinical evaluation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the performance of the pediatric LMA Supreme™, Air-Q® and Ambu® Aura-i™.This prospective observational study was performed at Bern University Hospital, Switzerland. With ethics committee approval and a waiver for written informed consent 240 children undergoing elective surgery with an ASA class I-III and a weight of 5-30 kg were included. Three different pediatric supraglottic airway devices were assessed: The LMA Supreme™, Air-Q® and Ambu® Aura-i™. Primary outcome parameter was airway leak pressure. Secondary outcome parameters included first attempt and overall success rate, insertion time, fiberoptic view through the SGA, and adverse events. The primary hypothesis was that the mean airway leak pressure of each tested SGA was 20 cmH2O ± 10%.None of the SGA showed a mean airway leak pressure of 20 cmH2O ± 10%, but mean airway leak pressures differed significantly between devices [LMA Supreme™ 18.0 (3.4) cmH2O, Air-Q® 15.9 (3.2) cmH2O, Ambu® Aura-i™ 17.3 (3.7) cmH2O, p < 0.001]. First attempt success rates (LMA Supreme™ 100%, Air-Q® 90%, Ambu® Aura-i™ 91%, p = 0.02) and overall success rates (LMA Supreme™ 100%, Air-Q® 91%, Ambu® Aura-i™ 95%, p = 0.02) also differed significantly. Insertion times ranged from 20 (7) seconds (Air-Q®) to 24 (6) seconds (LMA Supreme™, <p = 0.005). Insertion was rated easiest with the LMA Supreme™ (very easy in 97% vs. Air-Q® 70%, Ambu® Aura-i™ 72%, p < 0.001). Fiberoptic view was similar between the SGA. Adverse events were rare.Airway leak pressures ranged from 16 to 18 cmH2O, enabling positive pressure ventilation with all successful SGA. The highest success rates were achieved by the LMA Supreme™, which was also rated easiest to insert.ClinicalTrials.gov , identifier NCT01625858 . Registered 31 May 2012.

Project description:ImportanceThe optimal approach to airway management during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is unknown.ObjectiveTo determine whether a supraglottic airway device (SGA) is superior to tracheal intubation (TI) as the initial advanced airway management strategy in adults with nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.Design, setting, and participantsMulticenter, cluster randomized clinical trial of paramedics from 4 ambulance services in England responding to emergencies for approximately 21 million people. Patients aged 18 years or older who had a nontraumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and were treated by a participating paramedic were enrolled automatically under a waiver of consent between June 2015 and August 2017; follow-up ended in February 2018.InterventionsParamedics were randomized 1:1 to use TI (764 paramedics) or SGA (759 paramedics) as their initial advanced airway management strategy.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score at hospital discharge or 30 days after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, whichever occurred sooner. Modified Rankin Scale score was divided into 2 ranges: 0-3 (good outcome) or 4-6 (poor outcome; 6 = death). Secondary outcomes included ventilation success, regurgitation, and aspiration.ResultsA total of 9296 patients (4886 in the SGA group and 4410 in the TI group) were enrolled (median age, 73 years; 3373 were women [36.3%]), and the modified Rankin Scale score was known for 9289 patients. In the SGA group, 311 of 4882 patients (6.4%) had a good outcome (modified Rankin Scale score range, 0-3) vs 300 of 4407 patients (6.8%) in the TI group (adjusted risk difference [RD], -0.6% [95% CI, -1.6% to 0.4%]). Initial ventilation was successful in 4255 of 4868 patients (87.4%) in the SGA group compared with 3473 of 4397 patients (79.0%) in the TI group (adjusted RD, 8.3% [95% CI, 6.3% to 10.2%]). However, patients randomized to receive TI were less likely to receive advanced airway management (3419 of 4404 patients [77.6%] vs 4161 of 4883 patients [85.2%] in the SGA group). Two of the secondary outcomes (regurgitation and aspiration) were not significantly different between groups (regurgitation: 1268 of 4865 patients [26.1%] in the SGA group vs 1072 of 4372 patients [24.5%] in the TI group; adjusted RD, 1.4% [95% CI, -0.6% to 3.4%]; aspiration: 729 of 4824 patients [15.1%] vs 647 of 4337 patients [14.9%], respectively; adjusted RD, 0.1% [95% CI, -1.5% to 1.8%]).Conclusions and relevanceAmong patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, randomization to a strategy of advanced airway management with a supraglottic airway device compared with tracheal intubation did not result in a favorable functional outcome at 30 days.Trial registrationISRCTN Identifier: 08256118.