Dataset Information

The design of RIP belts impacts the reliability and quality of the measured respiratory signals.

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

Evaluate the effect of respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP) belt design on the reliability and quality of respiratory signals. A comparison of cannula flow to disposable cut-to-fit, semi-disposable folding and disposable RIP belts was performed in clinical home sleep apnea testing (HSAT) studies.

Methods

This was a retrospective study using clinical HSAT studies. The signal reliability of cannula, thorax, and abdomen RIP belts was determined by automatically identifying periods during which the signals did not represent respiratory airflow and breathing movements. Results were verified by manual scoring. RIP flow quality was determined by examining the correlation between the RIP flow and cannula flow when both signals were considered reliable.

Results

Of 767 clinical HSAT studies, mean signal reliability of the cut-to-fit, semi-disposable, and disposable thorax RIP belts was 83.0 ± 26.2%, 76.1 ± 24.4%, and 98.5 ± 9.3%, respectively. The signal reliability of the cannula was 92.5 ± 16.1%, 87.0 ± 23.3%, and 85.5 ± 24.5%, respectively. The automatic assessment of signal reliability for the RIP belts and cannula flow had a sensitivity of 50% and a specificity of 99% compared with manual assessment. The mean correlation of cannula flow to RIP flow from the cut-to-fit, semi-disposable, and disposable RIP belts was 0.79 ± 0.24, 0.52 ± 0.20, and 0.86 ± 0.18, respectively.

Conclusion

The design of RIP belts affects the reliability and quality of respiratory signals. The disposable RIP belts that had integrated contacts and did not fold on top of themselves performed the best. The cut-to-fit RIP belts were most likely to be unreliable, and the semi-disposable folding belts produced the lowest-quality RIP flow signals compared to the cannula flow signal.

SUBMITTER: Montazeri K

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8376735 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND: One of the challenges with modeling the temporal progression of biological signals is dealing with the effect of noise and the limited number of replicates at each time point. Given the rising interest in utilizing predictive mathematical models to describe the biological response of an organism or analysis such as clustering and gene ontology enrichment, it is important to determine whether the dynamic progression of the data has been accurately captured despite the limited number of replicates, such that one can have confidence that the results of the analysis are capturing important salient dynamic features. RESULTS: By pre-selecting genes based upon quality before the identification of differential expression via algorithm such as EDGE, it was found that the percentage of statistically enriched ontologies (p < .05) was improved. Furthermore, it was found that a majority of the genes found via the proposed technique were also selected via an EDGE selection though the reverse was not necessarily true. It was also found that improvements offered by the proposed algorithm are anti-correlated with improvements in the various microarray platforms and the number of replicates. This is illustrated by the fact that newer arrays and experiments with more replicates show less improvement when the filtering for quality is first run before the selection of differentially expressed genes. This suggests that the increase in the number of replicates as well as improvements in array technologies are increase the confidence one has in the dynamics obtained from the experiment. CONCLUSION: We have developed an algorithm that quantifies the quality of temporal biological signal rather than whether the signal illustrates a significant change over the experimental time course. Because the use of these temporal signals, whether it is in mathematical modeling or clustering, focuses upon the entire time series, it is necessary to develop a method to quantify and select for signals which conform to this ideal. By doing this, we have demonstrated a marked and consistent improvement in the results of a clustering exercise over multiple experiments, microarray platforms, and experimental designs.

Project description:Infants are at risk for potentially life-threatening postoperative apnea (POA). We developed an Automated Unsupervised Respiratory Event Analysis (AUREA) to classify breathing patterns obtained with dual belt respiratory inductance plethysmography and a reference using Expectation Maximization (EM). This work describes AUREA and evaluates its performance. AUREA computes six metrics and inputs them into a series of four binary k-means classifiers. Breathing patterns were characterized by normalized variance, nonperiodic power, instantaneous frequency and phase. Signals were classified sample by sample into one of 5 patterns: pause (PAU), movement (MVT), synchronous (SYB) and asynchronous (ASB) breathing, and unknown (UNK). MVT and UNK were combined as UNKNOWN. Twenty-one preprocessed records obtained from infants at risk for POA were analyzed. Performance was evaluated with a confusion matrix, overall accuracy, and pattern specific precision, recall, and F-score. Segments of identical patterns were evaluated for fragmentation and pattern matching with the EM reference. PAU exhibited very low normalized variance. MVT had high normalized nonperiodic power and low frequency. SYB and ASB had a median frequency of respectively, 0.76Hz and 0.71Hz, and a mode for phase of 4o and 100o. Overall accuracy was 0.80. AUREA confused patterns most often with UNKNOWN (25.5%). The pattern specific F-score was highest for SYB (0.88) and lowest for PAU (0.60). PAU had high precision (0.78) and low recall (0.49). Fragmentation was evident in pattern events <2s. In 75% of the EM pattern events >2s, 50% of the samples classified by AUREA had identical patterns. Frequency and phase for SYB and ASB were consistent with published values for synchronous and asynchronous breathing in infants. The low normalized variance in PAU, was consistent with published scoring rules for pediatric apnea. These findings support the use of AUREA to classify breathing patterns and warrant a future evaluation of clinically relevant respiratory events.