Project description:A 73-year-old woman was admitted for atrial tachycardia (AT) ablation. The activation map and pacing study indicated that the AT propagated around the left pulmonary vein and that the Marshall bundle (MB) bypassed the scar area of the left pulmonary vein ridge and mitral isthmus. The Rhythmia Mapping System revealed double potentials propagated along the assumed position of the MB. The mapping system includes a confidence mask that can be used to visually identify low-confidence areas of the map based upon extremely low-voltage signals. Given the low-voltage area in the endocardial side, the epicardial conduction was emphasized.
Project description:BackgroundElectroanatomic mapping is usually required in order to obtain a precise diagnosis and guide the ablation of atrial tachycardias (ATs) after ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, epicardial connections may limit the interpretation of the endocardial activation sequence as well as the efficacy of endocardial radiofrequency ablation.Case summaryA 53-year-old man with history of AF ablation 2 years ago was admitted for ablation of a recurrent AT (cycle length 275 ms). Ultra-high-density mapping with the Rhythmia™ system revealed a challenging activation map with two focal points of early activation in the left atrium. The use of an advanced mapping software allowed the rapid reanalysis and reannotation of the activation map and suggested epicardial involvement of the Marshall bundle (MB). Subsequent ethanol infusion in the vein of Marshall (VOM) immediately terminated the tachycardia. Six months post-ablation, the patient had no recurrence of arrhythmias.DiscussionThis case highlights the role of novel diagnostic and treatment methods in the management of a post-AF ablation AT. By developments in cardiac mapping systems, the rapid editing of a high-density activation map and clarification of the arrhythmia origin can be facilitated overcoming the limitations of conventional techniques. Moreover, ethanol infusion in the VOM was shown to be an effective alternative method in the management of MB-related tachycardias.
Project description:Left atrial appendage (LAA) is a well-known source of focal atrial tachycardias (AT). Although radio-frequency (RF) energy is the most commonly used technique in such cases, there was an option other than epicardial approach when RF technique fails. Cryoballoon technology is primarily developed to be used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Also, there was no report regarding the isolation of LAA by using cryo-balloon in patients with focal AT. In this case, for the first time in the literature, we successfully isolated the LAA because of failed attempts of RF ablation for focal AT in whom the surface electrogram showed a sinus rhythm while arrhythmia continues inside the LAA.
Project description:Identification of the critical isthmus of the reentrant tachycardia is essential to maximize the effect of catheter ablation (CA) and to minimize the myocardial injury of CA. An 81-year-old woman presented recurrent palpitations after CA of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT). She had moderate aortic valve stenosis and coronary artery disease. She had received a pulmonary vein isolation, left atrial (LA) posterior wall isolation, and LA anterior linear ablation for atrial fibrillation 1 year prior. At the start of the procedure, she was in sinus rhythm. Atrial burst pacing induced an AT (230msec). High-density mapping revealed a figure-of-eight activation pattern within the LA appendage (LAA), accounting for 99% of the tachycardia cycle length. The critical isthmus was identified at the mid LAA and the local electrogram of the critical isthmus was not fractionated. A single radiofrequency application at the critical isthmus of the AT, terminated the AT. She was free from any ATs for 28 months. Radiofrequency ablation of the localized reentrant AT was usually performed targeting long fractionated electrograms. In our case, the local electrogram at the critical isthmus was not fragmented compared with the LAA distal part. Long fractionated electrograms were recorded at a more distal part of the LAA than the common isthmus and we could avoid the potential risk of a perforation. A recent developed 3-dimensional electro-anatomical mapping system can identify the critical isthmus and allow us to select a new therapeutic strategy for a critical isthmus ablation of an AT within the LAA.
Project description:AimsThis study sought to describe left atrial macroreentry tachycardia (LAMRT) originating from the spontaneous scarring of left atrial anterior wall (LAAW) and its clinical and electrophysiological characteristics, mechanisms, and the formation of substrates.Methods and results9 of 123 patients (89% female, age 79.78 ± 5.59 years) had LAMRT originating from the LAAW with no cardiac surgery or prior left atrial (LA) ablation. The mean tachycardia cycle length (TCL) was 241.67 ± 38.00 milliseconds. Spontaneous scars areas and low voltage areas (LVAs) in the LAAW were found in all patients. Successful ablation of the critical isthmus caused termination of the LAMRT and was not inducible in all patients. Arrhythmogenic substrates of LAMRT were the spontaneous scars of LAAW, which matched with the aorta or/and pulmonary artery contact area. The area under the curve (AUC) of age and combination of gender and age for predicting the LAMRT originating from the LAAW were 0.918 and 0.951, respectively, with a cutoff value of ≥73.5 years of age and gender (female) predicting LAMRT with 88.9% sensitivity and 89% specificity.ConclusionCombination of gender and age provides a simple and useful criterion to distinguish LAMRT from cavotricuspid isthmus- (CTI-) dependent atrial tachycardia in macroreentry atrial tachycardia (MRAT) in patients without a history of surgery or ablation. Aorta or/and pulmonary artery contacting LA may be related to spontaneous scars. Ablation the isthmus eliminated LAMRT in all patients.
Project description:BackgroundRecent studies suggested that the left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has a better efficacy to reduce QRS duration and produce a lower pacing threshold than the conventional right ventricular outflow tract septal pacing (RVOP), which resulted in a better cardiac function and ventricular synchronization. However, whether the LBBAP has a better efficacy in improving left atrial structure, function in pace-dependent patients compared with RVOP has not been well studied.ObjectiveThe purpose of this study was to compare the atrial outcomes of pace-dependent patients who received LBBAP or RVOP procedures.Methods and resultsA total of 72 patients (including II° AVB, high AVB, and III° AVB, excluding atrial fibrillation patients with atrioventricular block) consecutively enrolled in this single-center prospective clinical study and randomly assigned to the RVOP group and the LBBP group with 36 patients. All patients were pace-dependent. The changes in echocardiogram, speckle-tracking echocardiography, brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and 6-min walking distance were documented and compared between two groups at baseline, 7 days, 1, 3, and 6 months after the implantation. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups. The results of the study were as following: (1) left atrial structure index: Our study indicated that there are no significant differences in left atrial anteroposterior dimension (LAAPD), left atrial superoinferior dimension, and left atrial mediolateral dimension between two groups. While the LAAPD in the LBBAP group was significantly reduced at 6 months after implantation ([38.22 ± 2.17] mm vs. [34.13 ± 1.59] mm, p < .05). (2) Left atrial strain index: We observed that the S% was significantly improved in both groups at 3 and 6 months after implantation but more prominent in the LBBAP group at 6 months (36.94 ± 11.67 vs. 25.87 ± 8.93, p = .01). SRs, SRe were improved in the RVOP group at 6 months after implantation but was further significantly increased in the LBBAP group. Similarly, the SRa in the LBBAP group was significantly better than the RVOP group after 6 months (-2.11 ± 0.75 vs. -2.51 ± 0.70, p = .04). (3) Left atrial ejection index: LAEF% in the LBBAP group was significantly improved compared with the RVOP group (60.02 ± 1.88 vs. 53.65 ± 2.45, p = .047) and baseline (60.02 ± 1.88 vs. 49.68 ± 2.75, p < .05) at 6 months after the surgery. (4) Left ventricular ejection index: The LVEF% in the LBBAP group was significantly increased than the RVOP group after 6 months (69.14 ± 4.99 vs. 64.60 ± 4.84, p = .01) and the BNP level was significantly lower in the LBBAP group compared with the RVOP group at 7 days, 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation (p < .05). (5) 6-min walking distance: the 6-min walking distance was significantly increased at 3 and 6 months after implantation compared with that before (p < .05) in both groups, but was more prominent in LBBAP groups ([483.03 ± 11.02] m vs. [431.09 ± 10.69] m,p < .05).ConclusionCompared with the traditional RVOP, the LBBAP procedure increased left atrial myocardial stress as well as left atrial ejection in pace-dependent patients at follow-up to 6 months.
Project description:BackgroundWe describe our initial experience using a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter for the treatment of left atrial (LA) reentry tachycardia.MethodsWe included all patients with LA reentry tachycardia treated with PFA at our institution between September 2021 and March 2022. The tachycardia mechanism was identified using 3D electro-anatomical mapping (3D-EAM). Subsequently, a roof line, anterior line, or mitral isthmus line was ablated as appropriate. Roof line ablation was always combined with LA posterior wall (LAPW) ablation. Positioning of the PFA catheter was guided by a 3D-EAM system and by fluoroscopy. Bidirectional block across lines was verified using standard criteria. Additional radiofrequency ablation (RFA) was used to achieve bidirectional block as necessary.ResultsAmong 22 patients (median age 70 (59-75) years; 9 females), we identified 27 LA reentry tachycardia: seven roof dependent macro-reentries, one posterior-wall micro-reentry, twelve peri-mitral macro-reentries, and seven anterior-wall micro-reentries. We ablated a total of 20 roof lines, 13 anterior lines, and 6 mitral isthmus lines. Additional RFA was necessary for two anterior lines (15%) and three mitral isthmus lines (50%). Bidirectional block was achieved across all roof lines, 92% of anterior lines, and 83% of mitral isthmus lines. We observed no acute procedural complications.ConclusionAblation of a roof line and of the LAPW is feasible, effective, and safe using this multipolar PFA catheter. However, the catheter is less suited for ablation of the mitral isthmus and the anterior line. A focal pulsed-field ablation catheter may be more effective for ablation of these lines. This study shows the feasibility to ablate linear lesions with a multipolar pulsed-field ablation catheter. 27 left atrial reentry tachycardia were treated in 22 patients.