Dataset Information

A glycosyltransferase gene signature to detect pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma patients with poor prognosis.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is characterized by an important heterogeneity, reflected by different clinical outcomes and chemoresistance. During carcinogenesis, tumor cells display aberrant glycosylated structures, synthetized by deregulated glycosyltransferases, supporting the tumor progression. In this study, we aimed to determine whether PDAC could be stratified through their glycosyltransferase expression profiles better than the current binary classification (basal-like and classical) in order to improve detection of patients with poor prognosis.

Methods

Bioinformatic analysis of 169 glycosyltransferase RNA sequencing data were performed for 74 patient-derived xenografts (PDX) of resected and unresectable tumors. The Australian cohort of International Cancer Genome Consortium and the microarray dataset from Puleo patient's cohort were used as independent validation datasets.

Findings

New PDAC stratification based on glycosyltransferase expression profile allowed to distinguish different groups of patients with distinct clinical outcome (p-value = 0.007). A combination of 19 glycosyltransferases differentially expressed in PDX defined a glyco-signature, whose prognostic value was validated on datasets including resected whole tumor tissues. The glyco-signature was able to discriminate three clusters of PDAC patients on the validation cohorts, two clusters displaying a short overall survival compared to one cluster having a better prognosis. Both poor prognostic clusters having different glyco-profiles in Puleo patient's cohort were correlated with stroma activated or desmoplastic subtypes corresponding to distinct microenvironment features (p-value < 0.0001). Besides, differential expression and enrichment analyses revealed deregulated functional pathways specific to different clusters.

Interpretation

This study identifies a glyco-signature relevant for a prognostic use, potentially applicable to resected and unresectable PDAC. Furthermore, it provides new potential therapeutic targets.

Funding

This work was supported by INCa (Grants number 2018-078 and 2018-079), Fondation ARC (Grant number ARCPJA32020070002326), Cancéropôle PACA, DGOS (labelization SIRIC, Grant number 6038), Amidex Foundation and Ligue Nationale Contre le Cancer and by institutional fundings from INSERM and the Aix-Marseille Université.

SUBMITTER: Mohamed Abd-El-Halim Y

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8379629 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundPancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies and is not a clinically homogeneous disease, but subsets of patients with distinct prognosis and response to therapy can be identified by genome-wide analyses. Mutations in major PDAC driver genes were associated with poor survival. By bioinformatics analysis, we identified protocadherins among the most frequently mutated genes in PDAC suggesting an important role of these genes in the biology of this tumor. Promoter methylation of protocadherins has been suggested as a prognostic marker in different tumors, but in PDAC this epigenetic modification has not been extensively studied. Thus, we evaluated whether promoter methylation of three frequently mutated protocadherins, PCDHAC2, PCDHGC5 and PCDH10 could be used as survival predictors in PDAC patients.MethodsDNA extracted from 23 PDACs and adjacent non-neoplastic pancreatic tissues were bisulfite treated. Combined Bisulfite Restriction Analysis (COBRA) coupled to denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography (dHPLC) detection and bisulfite genomic sequencing (BGS) were used to determine the presence of methylated CpG dinucleotides in the promoter amplicons analyzed.ResultsIn an exploratory analysis, two protocadherins showed the same pattern of CpG methylation in PDAC and adjacent non-neoplastic pancreatic tissues: lack of methylation for PCDHAC2, complete methylation for PCDHGC5. Conversely, the third protocadherin analyzed, PCDH10, showed a variable degree of CpG methylation in PDAC and absence of methylation in adjacent non-neoplastic pancreatic tissues. At Kaplan-Meier analysis, high levels of PCDH10 methylation defined according to the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) rates (P = 0.008), but not with overall survival (OS). High levels of PCDH10 methylation were a prognostic factor influencing PFS (HR = 4.0: 95% CI, 1.3-12.3; P = 0.016), but not the OS.ConclusionsIn this study, we show for the first time that the methylation status of PCDH10 can predict prognosis in PDAC patients with a significant impact on the outcome in terms of progression-free survival. High levels of PCDH10 promoter methylation could be useful to identify patients at high risk of disease progression, contributing to a more accurate stratification of PDAC patients for personalized clinical management.

Project description:A six-gene signature predicts survival of patients with localized pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), comprising over 90% of all pancreatic cancers, remains a lethal disease with an estimated 232,000 new cases, 227,000 deaths per year worldwide, and a less than 5% five-year survival rate. Currently the standard of care for the 20% of patients with localized disease is surgery followed by chemotherapy, and in some cases radiation. Unfortunately despite the use of adjuvant therapy, median survival remains at best 23 months. It is important to note however, that up to 27% of patients with resected PDAC can survive for five years. However, in these studies examining actual long-term survivors, only two have found that adjuvant therapy was associated with improved survival. In addition, randomized controlled trials of gemcitabine-based chemotherapy demonstrate an improvement in median survival of at best 3 months. One possible conclusion from these studies is that tumor biology dictates outcome and that our current adjuvant therapy has only a modest impact on altering a patient's course.Hypothesizing that the dismal outcome of patients with localized disease is due to the presence of micrometastasic disease, current clinical investigation has focused on preoperative or neoadjuvant therapy. This approach, where patients who cannot tolerate the stress of therapy or develop metastatic disease during treatment are spared surgery, has demonstrated an overall survival of 34 months in this highly selected patient population. Therefore the ability to select patients who would most benefit from a neoadjuvant approach may be important. One way to do this is to define a prognostic gene signature that can identify patients with more aggressive tumor biology upfront. reference x sample The 30 Nebraska and UNC samples were not analyzed with clinical data so it is not provided. One of the PE samples is missing some clinical data.