Dataset Information

Incorporating Immunoproteins in the Development of Classification Models of Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage After Traumatic Brain Injury.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To define clinical, radiographic, and blood-based biomarker features to be incorporated into a classification model of progression of intracranial hemorrhage (PICH), and to provide a pilot assessment of those models.

Methods

Patients with hemorrhage on admission head computed tomography were identified from a prospectively enrolled cohort of subjects with traumatic brain injury. Initial and follow-up images were interpreted both by 2 independent readers, and disagreements adjudicated. Admission plasma samples were analyzed and principal components (PCs) composed of the immune proteins (IPs) significantly associated with the outcome of interest were selected for further evaluation. A series of logistic regression models were constructed based on (1) clinical variables (CV) and (2) clinical variables + immune proteins (CV+IP). Error rates of these models for correct classification of PICH were estimated; significance was set at P < .05.

Results

We identified 106 patients, 36% had PICH. Dichotomized admission Glasgow Coma Scale (P = .004), Marshall score (P = .004), and 3 PCs were significantly associated with PICH. For the CV only model, sensitivity was 1.0 and specificity was 0.29 (95% CI, 0.07-0.67). The CV+IP model performed significantly better, with a sensitivity of 0.93 (95% CI, 0.64-0.99) and a specificity of 1.0 (P = .008). Adjustments to refine the definition of PICH and better define radiographic predictors of PICH did not significantly improve the models' performance.

Conclusions

In this pilot investigation, we observed that composites of IPs may improve PICH classification models when combined with CVs. However, overall model performance must be further optimized; results will inform feature inclusion included in follow-up models.

SUBMITTER: Hinson HE

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8380269 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:ImportanceIntracerebral hemorrhage progression is associated with unfavorable outcome after traumatic brain injury (TBI). No effective treatments are currently available. This secondary injury process reflects an extreme form of vasogenic edema and blood-brain barrier breakdown. The sulfonylurea receptor 1-transient receptor potential melastatin 4 (SUR1-TRPM4) cation channel is a key underlying mechanism. A phase 2 trial of SUR1-TRPM4 inhibition in contusional TBI is ongoing, and a phase 3 trial is being designed. Targeted identification of patients at increased risk for hemorrhage progression may inform prognostication, trial design (including patient selection), and ultimately treatment response.ObjectiveTo determine whether ABCC8 (SUR1) and TRPM4 genetic variability are associated with intraparenchymal hemorrhage (IPH) progression after severe TBI, based on the putative involvement of the SUR1-TRPM4 channel in this pathophysiology.Design, setting, and participantsIn this genetic association study, DNA was extracted from 416 patients with severe TBI prospectively enrolled from a level I trauma academic medical center from May 9, 2002, to August 8, 2014. Forty ABCC8 and TRPM4 single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) were genotyped (multiplex, unbiased). Data were analyzed from January 7, 2020, to May 3, 2021.Main outcomes and measuresPrimary analyses addressed IPH progression at 6, 24, and 120 hours in patients without acute craniectomy (n = 321). Multivariable regressions and receiver operating characteristic curves assessed SNV and haplotype associations with progression. Spatial modeling and functional predictions were determined using standard software.ResultsOf the 321 patients included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 37.0 [16.3] years; 247 [76.9%] male), IPH progression occurred in 102. Four ABCC8 SNVs were associated with markedly increased odds of progression (rs2237982 [odds ratio (OR), 2.60-3.80; 95% CI, 1.14-5.90 to 1.80-8.02; P = .02 to P < .001], rs2283261 [OR, 3.37-4.77; 95% CI, 1.07-10.77 to 1.89-12.07; P = .04 to P = .001], rs3819521 [OR, 2.96-3.92; 95% CI, 1.13-7.75 to 1.42-10.87; P = .03 to P = .009], and rs8192695 [OR, 3.06-4.95; 95% CI, 1.02-9.12 to 1.67-14.68]; P = .03-.004). These are brain-specific expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) associated with increased ABCC8 messenger RNA levels. Regulatory annotations revealed promoter and enhancer marks and strong and/or active brain-tissue transcription, directionally consistent with increased progression. Three SNVs (rs2283261, rs2237982, and rs3819521) in this cohort have been associated with intracranial hypertension. Four TRPM4 SNVs were associated with decreased IPH progression (rs3760666 [OR, 0.40-0.49; 95% CI, 0.19-0.86 to 0.27-0.89; P = .02 to P = .009], rs1477363 [OR, 0.40-0.43; 95% CI, 0.18-0.88 to 0.23-0.81; P = .02 to P = .006], rs10410857 [OR, 0.36-0.41; 95% CI, 0.20-0.67 to 0.20-0.85; P = .02 to P = .001], and rs909010 [OR, 0.27-0.40; 95% CI, 0.12-0.62 to 0.16-0.58; P = .002 to P < .001]). Significant SNVs in both genes cluster downstream, flanking exons encoding the receptor site and SUR1-TRPM4 binding interface. Adding genetic variation to clinical models improved receiver operating characteristic curve performance from 0.6959 to 0.8030 (P = .003).Conclusions and relevanceIn this genetic association study, 8 ABCC8 and TRPM4 SNVs were associated with IPH progression. Spatial clustering, brain-specific eQTL, and regulatory annotations suggest biological plausibility. These findings may have important implications for neurocritical care risk stratification, patient selection, and precision medicine, including an upcoming phase 3 trial design for SUR1-TRPM4 inhibition in severe TBI.

Project description:ImportanceTraumatic brain injury (TBI) affects millions of people in the US each year. Most patients with TBI seen in emergency departments (EDs) have a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and a head computed tomography (CT) scan showing no acute intracranial traumatic injury (negative head CT scan), yet the short-term and long-term functional outcomes of this subset of patients remain unclear.ObjectiveTo describe the 2-week and 6-month recovery outcomes in a cohort of patients with mild TBI with a GCS score of 15 and a negative head CT scan.Design, setting, and participantsThis cohort study analyzed participants who were enrolled from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2018, in the Transforming Research and Clinical Knowledge in Traumatic Brain Injury (TRACK-TBI) study, a prospective, observational cohort study of patients with TBI that was conducted in EDs of 18 level I trauma centers in urban areas. Of the total 2697 participants in the TRACK-TBI study, 991 had a GCS score of 15 and negative head CT scan and were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Data were analyzed from September 1, 2021, to May 30, 2022.Main outcomes and measuresThe primary outcome was the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) score, which was stratified according to functional recovery (GOS-E score, 8) vs incomplete recovery (GOS-E score, <8), at 2 weeks and 6 months after the injury. The secondary outcome was severity of mild TBI-related symptoms assessed by the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPQ) total score.ResultsA total of 991 participants (mean [SD] age, 38.5 [15.8] years; 631 male individuals [64%]) were included. Of these participants, 751 (76%) were followed up at 2 weeks after the injury: 204 (27%) had a GOS-E score of 8 (functional recovery), and 547 (73%) had a GOS-E scores less than 8 (incomplete recovery). Of 659 participants (66%) followed up at 6 months after the injury, 287 (44%) had functional recovery and 372 (56%) had incomplete recovery. Most participants with incomplete recovery reported that they had not returned to baseline or preinjury life (88% [479 of 546]; 95% CI, 85%-90%). Mean RPQ score was 16 (95% CI, 14-18; P < .001) points lower at 2 weeks (7 vs 23) and 18 (95% CI, 16-20; P < .001) points lower at 6 months (4 vs 22) in participants with a GOS-E score of 8 compared with those with a GOS-E score less than 8.Conclusions and relevanceThis study found that most participants with a GCS score of 15 and negative head CT scan reported incomplete recovery at 2 weeks and 6 months after their injury. The findings suggest that emergency department clinicians should recommend 2-week follow-up visits for these patients to identify those with incomplete recovery and to facilitate their rehabilitation.

Project description:PurposeA head injury (HI) may cause a skull fracture, which may or may not be associated with injury to the brain. In essence, a skull base fracture (SBF) is a linear fracture at the base of the skull. Loss of consciousness and Glasgow coma score (GCS) may vary depending on an associated intracranial pathology. The pathomechanism is believed to be caused by high energy impact directly to the mastoid and supraorbital bone or indirectly from the cranial vault. Aim of this study is to define the correlation between SBF and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in patients with HI.MethodsAnalysis of data obtained from a retrospective review of medical records and from a systematized database pertaining to diagnostic criteria of SBF patients based only on clinical symptoms associated with ICH caused by HI treated in the Department of Neurosurgery at Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, Indonesia from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2017. The exclusion criteria included age less than 15 years and no head computed tomography (CT) scan examination provided.ResultsA total of 9006 patients were included into this study in which they were divided into 3 groups: group 1, HI with no ICH; group 2, HI with single ICH and group 3, HI with multiple ICH. In all the SBF cases, SBF at anterior fossa accounted for 69.40% of them, which were mostly accompanied with mild HI (64.70%). Severity of HI and site of SBF correlated with the existence of traumatic brain lesions on CT scan, thus these factors were able to predict whether there were traumatic brain lesions or not. Most of the patients with epidural hemorrhage (EDH) has single traumatic lesion on CT scan, whereas most of the patients with cerebral contusion (CC) has multiple traumatic lesions on CT scan. On patients with both traumatic brain injury and SBF, most of the patients with anterior fossa SBF has EDH; whereas most of the patients with middle fossa SBF were accompanied with CC. Surgery was not required for most of the patients with SBF.ConclusionSBFs were strongly correlated with traumatic ICH lesions patients with anterior fossa SBF were more likely to suffer EDH whereas with middle fossa SBF were more likely to suffer CC.

Project description:BackgroundThe incidence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients of older age with comorbidities, who are pre-injury treated with antithrombotic agents (antiplatelets and/or anticoagulants), has increased. In this study, our aim was to investigate if pre-injury antithrombotic treatment was associated with worse intracranial hemorrhagic/injury progression and clinical outcome in patients with severe TBI.MethodsIn this retrospective study, including 844 TBI patients treated at our neurointensive care at Uppsala University Hospital, Sweden, 2008-2018, 159 (19%) were pre-injury treated with antithrombotic agents. Demography, admission status, radiology, treatment, and outcome variables were evaluated. Significant intracranial hemorrhagic/injury evolution was defined as hemorrhagic progression seen on the second computed tomography (CT), emergency neurosurgery after the initial CT, or death following the initial CT.ResultsPatients with pre-injury antithrombotics were significantly older and with a higher Charlson comorbidity index. They were more often injured by falls and more frequently developed acute subdural hematomas. Sixty-eight (8%) patients were pre-injury treated with monotherapy of antiplatelets, 67 (8%) patients with anticoagulants, and 24 (3%) patients with a combination of antithrombotics. Pre-injury anticoagulants, but not antiplatelets, were independently associated with significant intracranial hemorrhagic/injury evolution in a multiple regression analysis. However, neither anticoagulants nor antiplatelets were associated with mortality and unfavorable outcome in multiple regression analyses.ConclusionsOnly anticoagulants were associated with intracranial hemorrhagic/injury progression, but no antithrombotic agent correlated with worse clinical outcome. Management, including early anticoagulant reversal, availability of emergency neurosurgery, and neurointensive care, may be important aspects for reducing the adverse effects of pre-injury antithrombotics.

Project description:BackgroundEarly identification of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) has implications for triage and intervention. Blood-based biomarkers were recently approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for prediction of ICH in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI). We sought to determine if biomarkers measured early after injury improve prediction of mortality and clinical/radiologic outcomes compared with Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) alone in patients with moderate or severe TBI (MS-TBI).MethodsWe measured glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase L1 (UCH-L1), and microtubule-associated protein-2 (MAP-2) on arrival to the emergency department (ED) in patients with blunt TBI enrolled in the placebo arm of the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial (prehospital GCS score, 3-12; SPB, > 90). Biomarkers were modeled individually and together with prehospital predictor variables [PH] (GCS score, age, sex). Data were divided into a training data set and test data set for model derivation and evaluation. Models were evaluated for prediction of ICH, mass lesion, 48-hour and 28-day mortality, and 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E) and Disability Rating Scale (DRS). Area under the curve (AUC) was evaluated in test data for PH alone, PH + individual biomarkers, and PH + three biomarkers.ResultsOf 243 patients with baseline samples (obtained a median of 84 minutes after injury), prehospital GCS score was 8 (interquartile range, 5-10), 55% had ICH, and 48-hour and 28-day mortality were 7% and 13%, respectively. Poor neurologic outcome at 6 months was observed in 34% based on GOS-E of 4 or less, and 24% based on DRS greater than or equal to7. Addition of each biomarker to PH improved AUC in the majority of predictive models. GFAP+PH compared with PH alone significantly improved AUC in all models (ICH, 0.82 vs. 0.64; 48-hour mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.71; 28-day mortality, 0.84 vs. 0.66; GOS-E, 0.78 vs. 0.69; DRS, 0.84 vs. 0.81, all p < 0.001).ConclusionCirculating blood-based biomarkers may improve prediction of neurological outcomes and mortality in patients with MS-TBI over prehospital characteristics alone. Glial fibrillary acidic protein appears to be the most promising. Future evaluation in the prehospital setting is warranted.Level of evidenceProspective, Prognostic and Epidemiological, level II.

Project description:BackgroundIntracranial-pressure monitoring is considered the standard of care for severe traumatic brain injury and is used frequently, but the efficacy of treatment based on monitoring in improving the outcome has not been rigorously assessed.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter, controlled trial in which 324 patients 13 years of age or older who had severe traumatic brain injury and were being treated in intensive care units (ICUs) in Bolivia or Ecuador were randomly assigned to one of two specific protocols: guidelines-based management in which a protocol for monitoring intraparenchymal intracranial pressure was used (pressure-monitoring group) or a protocol in which treatment was based on imaging and clinical examination (imaging-clinical examination group). The primary outcome was a composite of survival time, impaired consciousness, and functional status at 3 months and 6 months and neuropsychological status at 6 months; neuropsychological status was assessed by an examiner who was unaware of protocol assignment. This composite measure was based on performance across 21 measures of functional and cognitive status and calculated as a percentile (with 0 indicating the worst performance, and 100 the best performance).ResultsThere was no significant between-group difference in the primary outcome, a composite measure based on percentile performance across 21 measures of functional and cognitive status (score, 56 in the pressure-monitoring group vs. 53 in the imaging-clinical examination group; P=0.49). Six-month mortality was 39% in the pressure-monitoring group and 41% in the imaging-clinical examination group (P=0.60). The median length of stay in the ICU was similar in the two groups (12 days in the pressure-monitoring group and 9 days in the imaging-clinical examination group; P=0.25), although the number of days of brain-specific treatments (e.g., administration of hyperosmolar fluids and the use of hyperventilation) in the ICU was higher in the imaging-clinical examination group than in the pressure-monitoring group (4.8 vs. 3.4, P=0.002). The distribution of serious adverse events was similar in the two groups.ConclusionsFor patients with severe traumatic brain injury, care focused on maintaining monitored intracranial pressure at 20 mm Hg or less was not shown to be superior to care based on imaging and clinical examination. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01068522.).