Dataset Information

Efficacy and Safety of Apatinib for Elderly Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer After Failure of at Least First-Line Chemotherapy: A Multi-Center, Single-Arm, Phase II Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Apatinib improves progression-free survival and overall survival with an acceptable safety profile in Chinese patients with chemotherapy-refractory advanced or metastatic gastric cancer. However, the efficacy and safety of apatinib are unclear for elderly patients. This study was undertaken to prospectively investigate the efficacy and safety of apatinib for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, who experienced progression to at least one lines of chemotherapy.

Methods

This open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients aged ≥60 years with advanced gastric cancer, who experienced progression to one or more lines of chemotherapy at five centers in China. Patients received apatinib in an oral dose of 500mg or 250mg daily according to the research physicians' decision. The primary end point was progression-free survival, and the secondary end points were objective response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and safety.

Results

Forty-eight patients were enrolled between June 2017 and September 2019. The median age was 65.5 years (range 60-80 years). Twenty-seven patients (56.3%) started treatment with an initial dose of 500 mg and 21 patients (43.7%) with 250 mg. The median progression-free survival and overall survival were 3.00 months (95% confidence interval, 2.17-3.84) and 8.10 months (95% confidence interval, 4.35-11.85), respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate assessed by the investigators were 16.7% and 72.9%, respectively. The common side effects were fatigue (58.3%), hypertension (47.9%), abdominal pain (33.3%), proteinuria (29.2%), leukopenia (22.9%), and neutropenia (20.8%). Hypertension (22.9%) was the major grade 3/4 toxicity.

Conclusion

These data suggest that apatinib is effective and relatively tolerable for elderly patients with unresectable advanced or metastatic gastric cancer who have received at least first-line chemotherapy.

SUBMITTER: Ren D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8380789 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundImmune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for first- and third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer. However, pembrolizumab alone in the second line did not improve overall survival compared to chemotherapy in the KEYNOTE-061 study. In this study, we aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of a three-drug regimen of PD-1 inhibitor combined with albumin paclitaxel and apatinib (a VEGFR inhibitor) for the second-line treatment of patients with metastatic gastric cancer (mGC).MethodsThis was a single-center, single-arm, phase II clinical study. Patients with mGC with stable microsatellite and negative HER-2 expression who failed first-line chemotherapy were enrolled. The enrolled patients were treated with PD-1 inhibitor (selected according to patients' requirements) in combination with albumin paclitaxel (125 mg/m2, intravenously, days 1 and 8, or 250 mg/m2, intravenously, day 1) and apatinib (250 or 500 mg, orally, days 1-21) every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, and adverse events (AEs).ResultsFrom July 11, 2019, to October 13, 2022, a total of 43 patients were enrolled, of whom 10 were PD-L1 negative, 11 were PD-L1 positive, and 22 had unknown PD-L1 expression. As of the data cutoff on April 1st, 2023, nine patients had partial response, 29 had stable disease, and five experienced progressive disease, with the ORR of 20.9% and DCR of 88.3%. The median PFS was 6.2 months (95% CI, 3.9-9.3), and the median OS was 10.1 months (95% CI, 7.5-14.1). All patients suffered from alopecia and neurotoxicity. The other main AEs of grade 1 or 2 were bone marrow suppression (N = 21, 48.8%), hand-foot reaction (N = 19, 44.2%), hypertension (N = 18, 41.9%), hypothyroidism (N = 11, 25.6%), gastrointestinal bleeding (N = 3, 7.0%), and liver function damage (N = 5, 11.6%). Two patients reported grade 3-4 immune-related liver damage.ConclusionSecond-line PD-1 inhibitor combined with albumin paclitaxel and apatinib showed certain efficacy and safety in patients with mGC.Trial registrationClinical trials, NCT04182724. Registered 27 November 2019; retrospectively registered, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04182724.

Project description:Lessons learnedApatinib combined with S-1 was not superior to other chemotherapy regimens as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. There was a tendency for patients with lymph node metastasis to have prolonged median progression-free survival and median overall survival, compared with patients with liver metastasis.BackgroundThe best choice of first-line chemotherapy regimen for patients with metastatic gastric cancer is still debated. We combined apatinib and S-1 as a new first-line therapy to treat advanced gastric cancer. The efficacy and safety of the combination were assessed, with the goal of determining the most appropriate subgroup of patients who could benefit from this new regimen.MethodsThis study was an open, exploratory single-arm, phase II trial. Enrolled patients received apatinib plus S-1 treatment (apatinib, 500 mg, once a day [qd], days 1-21; S-1, 40 mg/m2 , bid, days 1-14). The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and safety of this new regimen. Next-generation sequencing was used to explore potential biomarkers.ResultsA total of 30 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.21 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.29-6.13 months). The median overall survival (mOS) was 7.49 months (95% CI, 4.81-10.17 months). Patients with lymph node metastasis had prolonged mPFS and mOS when compared with those with liver metastasis (mPFS, 4.21 vs. 1.84 months; mOS, 8.21 vs. 6.31 months, p = .08). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were abdominal pain, dizziness, and diarrhea. Gene mutation profiles between the two subgroups were significantly different.ConclusionApatinib combined with S-1 was not superior to other chemotherapy regimens as first-line therapy for advanced gastric cancer. Toxicity was consistent with known profiles when given as monotherapy. There was a tendency toward prolonged mPFS and mOS in patients with lymph node metastasis compared with patients with liver metastasis, which could support the need to design a future clinical trial with a better defined patient population.

Project description:BackgroundApatinib, a highly selective VEGFR2 inhibitor, significantly improved efficacy versus placebo as a third- and later-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer in phase 2 and 3 trials. This prospective, single-arm, multicenter phase IV AHEAD study was conducted to verify the safety and efficacy of apatinib in patients with advanced or metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma after at least two lines of systematic therapy in clinical practice settings.MethodsPatients with advanced gastric cancer who had previously failed at least two lines of chemotherapy received oral apatinib until disease progression, death or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was safety. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Adverse events were summarized by the incidence rate. Median OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. ORR, DCR, OS at 3 and 6 months, and PFS at 3 and 6 months were calculated, and their 95% CIs were estimated according to the Clopper-Pearson method.ResultsBetween May 2015 and November 2019, a total of 2004 patients were enrolled, and 1999 patients who received at least one dose of apatinib were assessed for safety. In the safety population, 87.9% of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), with the most common hypertension (45.2%), proteinuria (26.5%), and white blood cell count decreased (25.3%). Additionally, 51% of patients experienced grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. Fatal TRAEs occurred in 57 (2.9%) patients. No new safety concerns were reported. Among the 2004 patients included in the intention-to-treat population, the ORR was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.6-5.4%), and DCR was 35.8% (95% CI, 33.7-38.0%). The median PFS was 2.7 months (95% CI 2.2-2.8), and the median OS was 5.8 months (95% CI 5.4-6.1).ConclusionsThe findings in the AHEAD study confirmed the acceptable and manageable safety profile and clinical benefit of apatinib in patients with advanced gastric cancer as a third- or later-line of treatment.Trial registrationThis study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02426034. Registration date was April 24, 2015.

Project description:BackgroundThe prognosis for esophageal cancer (EC), a common malignant tumor, is poor. The new oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor apatinib has shown an excellent therapeutic effect on treating EC. Camrelizumab is a humanized programmed death 1 (PD-1) inhibitor with high affinity. Immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy have become the standard first-line treatment for advanced EC. The new combination strategy of anti-angiogenic therapy combined with immunotherapy has great application prospects in the treatment of tumors. We aimed to assess camrelizumab in combination with apatinib as a new combination regimen for advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).MethodsIn this study, we recruited patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤2, with pathologically confirmed unresectable, locally advanced, locally recurrent, or metastatic ESCC. Each patient received an intravenous infusion of camrelizumab 200 mg and oral administration of apatinib 250 mg once a day, every 21 days, as a cycle until disease progression, intolerance, or death. The primary endpoint was the objective response rate (ORR), while the Kaplan-Meier method and LIFETEST procedure were used to estimate survival functions for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.03, was used to evaluate adverse events.ResultsBetween December 1, 2019 and July 31, 2022, 35 patients were enrolled, with 29 patients in the efficacy and safety analysis. The ORR was 34.5%, and the disease control rate (DCR) reached 82.8%. Median OS was 13.8 months (95% CI: 11.2-16.2), and the estimated 6-, 9-, and 12-month OS rates were 85.5% (95% CI: 65.7-94.3%), 80.9% (95% CI: 60.3-91.5%), and 67.0% (95% CI: 43.8-82.4%), respectively. Median PFS was 9.5 months (95% CI: 7.0-13.6). The most prominent grade ≥3 adverse events associated with treatments were alanine aminotransferase (ALT) increase (10.3%), hypertension (10.3%), and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (CCEP) (6.9%), and no deaths occurred due to adverse events.ConclusionsAmong patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, camrelizumab combined with apatinib showed a reasonable remission rate and survival benefit with a manageable safety profile.