Dataset Information

Prognostic value of different lymph node staging methods for node-positive cardia gastric cancer: a register-based retrospective cohort study.

ABSTRACT:

Objective

To investigate the prognostic efficacy of lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in node-positive cardia gastric adenocarcinoma (CGA).

Design

A registry-based retrospective cohort study.

Setting

Patients diagnosed with node-positive CGA in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from 2010 to 2015.

Participants

A total of 1038 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned (7:3) to the training set (n=723) or validating set (n=315).

Primary outcome measure

Cancer-specific survival (CSS).

Results

The baseline characteristics of the training and validation sets were similar. Based on the optimal cut-off values, LNR was classified into low (<0.09), medium (0.09~0.33) and high (>0.33) groups; LODDS was also classified into low (<-2.09), medium (-2.09~-0.65) and high (>-0.65) groups. CSS was significantly different across LNR and LODDS subgroups. The Harrell concordance index of the N stage was lower than that of the LNR or LODDS. The Akaike information criterion of the N stage was higher than that of the LNR or LODDS. Independent predictors included race, T stage, M stage and LNR (or LODDS), and they were incorporated into nomograms for 1-year, 2-year and 5-year CSS prediction. Calibration plots showed satisfactory results for internal and external validity of the nomogram.

Conclusions

LNR and LODDS staging methods have better prognostic efficacy than the traditional N staging method in CGA with node metastasis. Moreover, the two values are promising substitutes for N staging in nomogram development when other independent prognostic factors are incorporated.

SUBMITTER: Wang XQ

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8383860 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objective: To compare the prognostic predictive performance of six lymph node (LN) staging schemes: American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) N stage, number of retrieved lymph nodes (NRLN), number of positive lymph nodes (NPLN), number of negative lymph nodes (NNLN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) among node-positive endometrioid endometrial cancer (EEC) patients. Methods: A total of 3,533 patients diagnosed with node-positive EEC between 2010 and 2016 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database were retrospectively analyzed. We applied X-tile software to identify the optimal cutoff value for different staging schemes. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to assess the relationships between different LN schemes and survival outcomes [disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS)]. Moreover, Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Harrell concordance index (C-index) were used to evaluate the predictive performance of each scheme in both continuous and categorical patterns. Results: N stage (N1/N2) was not an independent prognostic factor for node-positive EEC patients based on multivariate analysis (DSS: p = 0.235; OS: p = 0.145). Multivariate model incorporating LNR demonstrated the most superior goodness of fit regardless of continuous or categorical pattern. Regarding discrimination power of the models, LNR outperformed other models in categorical pattern (OS: C-index = 0.735; DSS: C-index = 0.737); however, LODDS obtained the highest C-index in continuous pattern (OS: 0.736; DSS: 0.739). Conclusions: N stage (N1/N2) was unable to differentiate the prognosis for node-positive EEC patients in our study. However, LNR and LODDS schemes seemed to have a better predictive performance for these patients than other number-based LN schemes whether in DSS or OS, which revealed that LNR and LODDS should be more helpful in prognosis assessment for node-positive EEC patients than AJCC N stage.

Project description:BackgroundTesticular cancer represents the most common malignancy in young adult men. In the current study, we sought to analyze and compare the prognostic value of lymph node ratio (LNR) as well as positive lymph node counts (LNC) to understand its clinical significance in testicular germ cell tumors.MethodsWe employed eligibility criteria to recruit a total of 931 patients, with testicular cancer, from 2010 to 2015 from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We then used the X-Tile program to calculate LNR and LNC cutoff values and discriminate survival. We then calculated the overall and cancer specific survival rates and analyzed the association between LNR/LNC and clinical pathological characteristics using the χ2 test. Finally, we assessed the relationships between clinical pathological factors and patient survival using univariate Cox proportional hazard analysis.ResultsUnivariate analysis revealed a significant association between prognosis with age (HR, 5.169; 95% CI, 1.758-15.200; P = 0.003), AJCC stage (III vs I: HR, 9.298; 95% CI, 2.691-32.131; P < 0.001), M stage (HR, 7.897; 95% CI, 3.417-18.251; P < 0.001) and LNR (HR, 3.009; 95% CI, 1.275-7.098; P = 0.012). On the other hand, LNC (HR, 1.743; 95% CI, 0.687-4.420; P = 0.242) was not significantly associated with prognosis. Analysis of the association between LNR/LNC and clinical pathological characteristics showed that high LNR patients tended to have significantly larger tumor sizes (χ2 = 7.877, P = 0.005), as well as advanced T (χ2 = 13.195, P = 0.004), N ( χ2 = 86.775, P < 0.001), M (χ2 = 19.948, P < 0.001) and 7th AJCC (χ2 = 103.074, P < 0.001) stages. In addition, high LNC patients were significantly associated with T (χ2 = 8.799, P = 0.032), N (χ2 = 74.390, P < 0.001) and 7th AJCC (χ2 = 111.759, P < 0.001) stages.ConclusionLNR was a better predictor for long-term prognosis and was closely associated with clinical pathological characteristics than LNC in patients with testicular germ cell tumors.