Dataset Information

Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping.

ABSTRACT: Computational integrative analysis has become a significant approach in the data-driven exploration of biological problems. Many integration methods for cancer subtyping have been proposed, but evaluating these methods has become a complicated problem due to the lack of gold standards. Moreover, questions of practical importance remain to be addressed regarding the impact of selecting appropriate data types and combinations on the performance of integrative studies. Here, we constructed three classes of benchmarking datasets of nine cancers in TCGA by considering all the eleven combinations of four multi-omics data types. Using these datasets, we conducted a comprehensive evaluation of ten representative integration methods for cancer subtyping in terms of accuracy measured by combining both clustering accuracy and clinical significance, robustness, and computational efficiency. We subsequently investigated the influence of different omics data on cancer subtyping and the effectiveness of their combinations. Refuting the widely held intuition that incorporating more types of omics data always produces better results, our analyses showed that there are situations where integrating more omics data negatively impacts the performance of integration methods. Our analyses also suggested several effective combinations for most cancers under our studies, which may be of particular interest to researchers in omics data analysis.

SUBMITTER: Duan R

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8384175 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:It is now clear that major malignancies are heterogeneous diseases associated with diverse molecular properties and clinical outcomes, posing a great challenge for more individualized therapy. In the last decade, cancer molecular subtyping studies were mostly based on transcriptomic profiles, ignoring heterogeneity at other (epi-)genetic levels of gene regulation. Integrating multiple types of (epi)genomic data generates a more comprehensive landscape of biological processes, providing an opportunity to better dissect cancer heterogeneity. Here, we propose sparse canonical correlation analysis for cancer classification (SCCA-CC), which projects each type of single-omics data onto a unified space for data fusion, followed by clustering and classification analysis. Without loss of generality, as case studies, we integrated two types of omics data, mRNA and miRNA profiles, for molecular classification of ovarian cancer (n = 462), and breast cancer (n = 451). The two types of omics data were projected onto a unified space using SCCA, followed by data fusion to identify cancer subtypes. The subtypes we identified recapitulated subtypes previously recognized by other groups (all P- values < 0.001), but display more significant clinical associations. Especially in ovarian cancer, the four subtypes we identified were significantly associated with overall survival, while the taxonomy previously established by TCGA did not (P- values: 0.039 vs. 0.12). The multi-omics classifiers we established can not only classify individual types of data but also demonstrated higher accuracies on the fused data. Compared with iCluster, SCCA-CC demonstrated its superiority by identifying subtypes of higher coherence, clinical relevance, and time efficiency. In conclusion, we developed an integrated bioinformatic framework SCCA-CC for cancer molecular subtyping. Using two case studies in breast and ovarian cancer, we demonstrated its effectiveness in identifying biologically meaningful and clinically relevant subtypes. SCCA-CC presented a unique advantage in its ability to classify both single-omics data and multi-omics data, which significantly extends the applicability to various data types, and making more efficient use of published omics resources.

Dataset Information

Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets