Review of Mendelian Randomization Studies on Ovarian Cancer.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT:
SUBMITTER: Guo JZ
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8385140 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Purpose of review:In this paper, we summarize prior studies that have used Mendelian Randomization (MR) methods to study the effects of exposures, lifestyle factors, physical traits, and/or biomarkers on cancer risk in humans. Many such risk factors have been associated with cancer risk in observational studies, and the MR approach can be used to provide evidence as to whether these associations represent causal relationships. MR methods require a risk factor of interest to have known genetic determinants that can be used as proxies for the risk factor (i.e., "instrumental variables" or IVs), and these can be used to obtain an effect estimate that, under certain assumptions, is not prone to bias caused by unobserved confounding or reverse causality. This review seeks to describe how MR studies have contributed to our understanding of cancer causation. Recent findings:We searched the published literature and identified 76 MR studies of cancer risk published prior to October 31, 2017. Risk factors commonly studied included alcohol consumption, Vitamin D, anthropometric traits, telomere length, lipid traits, glycemic traits, and markers of inflammation. Risk factors showing compelling evidence of a causal association with risk for at least one cancer type include alcohol consumption (for head/neck and colorectal), adult body mass index (increases risk for multiple cancers, but decreases risk for breast), height (increases risk for breast, colorectal, and lung; decreases risk for esophageal), telomere length (increases risk for lung adenocarcinoma, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, glioma, B-cell lymphoma subtypes, chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and neuroblastoma), and hormonal factors (affects risk for sex-steroid sensitive cancers). Summary:This review highlights alcohol consumption, body mass index, height, telomere length, and the hormonal exposures as factors likely to contribute to cancer causation. This review also highlights the need to study specific cancer types, ideally subtypes, as the effects of risk factors can be heterogeneous across cancer types. As consortia-based genome-wide association studies increase in sample size and analytical methods for MR continue to become more sophisticated, MR will become an increasingly powerful tool for understanding cancer causation.
| S-EPMC6053056 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundWe aimed to map and describe the current state of Mendelian randomization (MR) literature on cancer risk and to identify associations supported by robust evidence.MethodsWe searched PubMed and Scopus up to 06/10/2020 for MR studies investigating the association of any genetically predicted risk factor with cancer risk. We categorized the reported associations based on a priori designed levels of evidence supporting a causal association into four categories, namely robust, probable, suggestive, and insufficient, based on the significance and concordance of the main MR analysis results and at least one of the MR-Egger, weighed median, MRPRESSO, and multivariable MR analyses. Associations not presenting any of the aforementioned sensitivity analyses were not graded.ResultsWe included 190 publications reporting on 4667 MR analyses. Most analyses (3200; 68.6%) were not accompanied by any of the assessed sensitivity analyses. Of the 1467 evaluable analyses, 87 (5.9%) were supported by robust, 275 (18.7%) by probable, and 89 (6.1%) by suggestive evidence. The most prominent robust associations were observed for anthropometric indices with risk of breast, kidney, and endometrial cancers; circulating telomere length with risk of kidney, lung, osteosarcoma, skin, thyroid, and hematological cancers; sex steroid hormones and risk of breast and endometrial cancer; and lipids with risk of breast, endometrial, and ovarian cancer.ConclusionsDespite the large amount of research on genetically predicted risk factors for cancer risk, limited associations are supported by robust evidence for causality. Most associations did not present a MR sensitivity analysis and were thus non-evaluable. Future research should focus on more thorough assessment of sensitivity MR analyses and on more transparent reporting.
| S-EPMC8809022 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Epidemiological studies suggest that higher serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D is associated with lower risk for several cancers, including breast, prostate, colorectal, and lung cancers. To mitigate confounding, genetic instrumental variables (IVs) have been used to estimate causal associations between 25-hydroxivtamin D and cancer risk via Mendelian randomization (MR). We provide a systematic review of 31 MR studies concerning 25-hydroxyvitamin D and cancer incidence and mortality identified from biomedical databases. MR analyses were conducted almost exclusively in European-ancestry populations and identified no statistically significant associations between higher genetically predicted 25-hydroxyvitamin D and lower risk for total cancer or colorectal, breast, prostate, lung, or pancreatic cancers. In recent studies including ≥80 genetic IVs for 25-hydroxyvitamin D, null associations were reported for total cancer (odds ratio [95% confidence interval] per 1-standard deviation increase: 0.98 [0.93-1.04]), breast (1.00 [0.98-1.02]), colorectal (0.97 [0.88-1.07]), prostate (0.99 [0.98-1.01]), and lung cancer (1.00 [0.93-1.03]). A protective association was observed for ovarian cancer in the Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium (0.78 [0.63-0.96] per 20 nmol/L increase, p-trend = 0.03), but not in the UK Biobank (1.10 [0.80-1.51]). Null associations were reported for other tumor sites (bladder, endometrium, uterus, esophagus, oral cavity and pharynx, kidney, liver, thyroid, or neural cells). An inconsistent protective association for cancer-specific mortality was also observed. Results from MR analyses do not support causal associations between 25-hydroxyvitamin D and risk for cancer incidence or mortality. Studies including non-White populations may be valuable to understand low 25-hydroxyvitamin D as a modifiable risk factor in populations with a higher risk of common cancers, including African ancestry individuals.
| S-EPMC9865859 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Endometriosis, a prevalent condition, has long been recognized as a chronic and debilitating ailment affecting an estimated 1790 million women worldwide. Observational studies have established a correlation between endometriosis and ovarian cancer. Thus, we endeavored to employ Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization, utilizing summary statistics from a Genome-Wide Association Study of endometriosis and epithelial ovarian cancer, with genetic markers serving as proxies for epithelial ovarian cancer. The analysis revealed a significant correlation between these entities, with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.23 (95% CI 1.11-1.36). Upon histotype-specific examination, robust evidence emerged for an association of endometriosis with the risk of endometrioid carcinoma (OR 1.49, 95% CI 1.24-1.81), clear cell carcinoma (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.75-3.73), and low malignant potential tumors (OR 1.28, 95% CI 1.08-1.53). These findings provide a theoretical framework for prospective investigations aimed at enhancing the potential therapeutic efficacy of managing endometriosis in averting the onset and progression of ovarian cancer.
| S-EPMC10713650 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BACKGROUND:Numerous risk factors for dementia are well established, though the causal nature of these associations remains unclear. OBJECTIVE:To systematically review Mendelian randomization (MR) studies investigating causal relationships between risk factors and global cognitive function or dementia. METHODS:We searched five databases from inception to February 2017 and conducted citation searches including MR studies investigating the association between any risk factor and global cognitive function, all-cause dementia or dementia subtypes. Two reviewers independently assessed titles and abstracts, full-texts, and study quality. RESULTS:We included 18 MR studies investigating education, lifestyle factors, cardiovascular factors and related biomarkers, diabetes related and other endocrine factors, and telomere length. Studies were of predominantly good quality, however eight received low ratings for sample size and statistical power. The most convincing causal evidence was found for an association of shorter telomeres with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Causal evidence was weaker for smoking quantity, vitamin D, homocysteine, systolic blood pressure, fasting glucose, insulin sensitivity, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Well-replicated associations were not present for most exposures and we cannot fully discount survival and diagnostic bias, or the potential for pleiotropic effects. CONCLUSIONS:Genetic evidence supported a causal association between telomere length and AD, whereas limited evidence for other risk factors was largely inconclusive with tentative evidence for smoking quantity, vitamin D, homocysteine, and selected metabolic markers. The lack of stronger evidence for other risk factors may reflect insufficient statistical power. Larger well-designed MR studies would therefore help establish the causal status of these dementia risk factors.
| S-EPMC6004893 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundCoronary artery disease (CAD) remains one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. We aimed to summarize what is currently known with regard to causal modifiable risk factors associated with CAD in populations of diverse ancestries through conducting a systematic review and meta-analysis of Mendelian randomization (MR) studies on CAD.MethodsThe databases Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched on the 19th and 20th of December 2022 for MR studies with CAD as a primary outcome; keywords of the search strategy included "coronary artery disease" and "mendelian randomization". Studies were included if they were published in the English language, included only human participants, employed Mendelian randomization as the primary methodology and studied CAD as the outcome of interest. The exclusion criteria resulted in the removal of studies that did not align with the predefined inclusion criteria, as well as studies which were systematic reviews themselves, and used the same exposure and outcome source as another study. An ancestry-specific meta-analysis was subsequently conducted on studies which investigated either body mass index, lipid traits, blood pressure or type 2 diabetes as an exposure variable. Assessment of publication bias and sensitivity analyses was conducted for risk of bias assessment in the included studies.ResultsA total of 1781 studies were identified through the database searches after de-duplication was performed, with 47 studies included in the quantitative synthesis after eligibility screening. Approximately 80% of all included study participants for MR studies on CAD were of European descent irrespective of the exposure of interest, while no study included individuals of African ancestry. We found no evidence of differences in terms of direction of causation between ancestry groups; however, the strength of the respective relationships between each exposure and CAD were different, with this finding most evident when blood pressure was the exposure of interest.ConclusionsFindings from this review suggest that patterns regarding the causational relationship between modifiable risk factors and CAD do not differ in terms of direction when compared across diverse ancestry populations. Differences in the observed strengths of the respective relationships however are indicative of the value of increasing representation in non-European populations, as novel genetic pathways or functional SNPs relating to CAD may be uncovered through a more global analysis.Systematic review registrationThe protocol for this systematic review was registered to the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) and is publicly available online (CRD42021272726).
| S-EPMC10790478 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundIt is well known that the occurrence and development of ovarian cancer are closely related to the patient's weight and various endocrine factors in the body.AimMendelian randomization (MR) was used to analyze the bidirectional relationship between insulin related characteristics and ovarian cancer.MethodsThe data on insulin related characteristics are from up to 5567 diabetes free patients from 10 studies, mainly including fasting insulin level, insulin secretion rate, peak insulin response, etc. For ovarian cancer, UK Biobank data just updated in 2021 was selected, of which the relevant gene data was from 199741 Europeans. Mendelian randomization method was selected, with inverse variance weighting (IVW) as the main estimation, while MR Pleiotropy, MR Egger, weighted median and other methods were used to detect the heterogeneity of data and whether there was multi validity affecting conclusions.ResultsAmong all insulin related indicators (fasting insulin level, insulin secretion rate, peak insulin response), the insulin secretion rate was selected to have a causal relationship with the occurrence of ovarian cancer (IVW, P < 0.05), that is, the risk of ovarian cancer increased with the decrease of insulin secretion rate. At the same time, we tested the heterogeneity and polymorphism of this indicator, and the results were non-existent, which ensured the accuracy of the analysis results. Reverse causal analysis showed that there was no causal effect between the two (P>0.05).ConclusionThe impairment of the insulin secretion rate has a causal effect on the risk of ovarian cancer, which was confirmed by Mendel randomization. This suggests that the human glucose metabolism cycle represented by insulin secretion plays an important role in the pathogenesis of ovarian cancer, which provides a new idea for preventing the release of ovarian cancer.
| S-EPMC10014907 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Epidemiological studies have linked adult height with breast cancer risk in women. However, the magnitude of the association, particularly by subtypes of breast cancer, has not been established. Furthermore, the mechanisms of the association remain unclear. We performed a meta-analysis to investigate associations between height and breast cancer risk using data from 159 prospective cohorts totaling 5216302 women, including 113178 events. In a consortium with individual-level data from 46325 case patients and 42482 control patients, we conducted a Mendelian randomization analysis using a genetic score that comprised 168 height-associated variants as an instrument. This association was further evaluated in a second consortium using summary statistics data from 16003 case patients and 41335 control patients. The pooled relative risk of breast cancer was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.15 to 1.19) per 10cm increase in height in the meta-analysis of prospective studies. In Mendelian randomization analysis, the odds ratio of breast cancer per 10cm increase in genetically predicted height was 1.22 (95% CI = 1.13 to 1.32) in the first consortium and 1.21 (95% CI = 1.05 to 1.39) in the second consortium. The association was found in both premenopausal and postmenopausal women but restricted to hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Analyses of height-associated variants identified eight new loci associated with breast cancer risk after adjusting for multiple comparisons, including three loci at 1q21.2, DNAJC27, and CCDC91 at genome-wide significance level P < 5×10(-8). Our study provides strong evidence that adult height is a risk factor for breast cancer in women and certain genetic factors and biological pathways affecting adult height have an important role in the etiology of breast cancer.
| S-EPMC4643630 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Most women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) present with late-stage disease. As a result, globally, EOC is responsible for >150,000 deaths a year. Thus, a better understanding of risk factors for developing EOC is crucial for earlier screening and detection to improve survival. To that effort, there have been suggestions that there is an association of schizophrenia and cancer, possibly because metabolic changes are a hallmark of both cancer and schizophrenia (SZ). Perturbed choline metabolism has been documented in both diseases. Our objective was to use Mendelian randomization to evaluate whether SZ increased risk for developing EOC or the converse, and, whether SZ impacted 1- or 2-glycerophosphocholine (1- or 2-GPC) metabolites. We found that SZ conferred a weak but increased risk for EOC, but not the reverse (no evidence that EOC caused SZ). SZ was also causally associated with lower levels of two 1- or 2-GPC species and with suggestively lower levels in an additional three 1- or 2-GPCs. We postulate that perturbed choline metabolism in SZ may mimic or contribute to a "cholinic" phenotype, as observed in EOC cells.
| S-EPMC6895746 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Habitual coffee and caffeine consumption has been reported to be associated with numerous health outcomes. This perspective focuses on Mendelian Randomization (MR) approaches for determining whether such associations are causal. Genetic instruments for coffee and caffeine consumption are described, along with key concepts of MR and particular challenges when applying this approach to studies of coffee and caffeine. To date, at least fifteen MR studies have investigated the causal role of coffee or caffeine use on risk of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, gout, osteoarthritis, cancers, sleep disturbances and other substance use. Most studies provide no consistent support for a causal role of coffee or caffeine on these health outcomes. Common study limitations include low statistical power, potential pleiotropy, and risk of collider bias. As a result, in many cases a causal role cannot confidently be ruled out. Conceptual challenges also arise from the different aspects of coffee and caffeine use captured by current genetic instruments. Nevertheless, with continued genome-wide searches for coffee and caffeine related loci along with advanced statistical methods and MR designs, MR promises to be a valuable approach to understanding the causal impact that coffee and caffeine have in human health.
| S-EPMC6213346 | biostudies-literature