Dataset Information

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing: Comparing the Tobramycin and Ceftazidime Gradient Diffusion Methodology Used in Assessing Synergy in Cystic Fibrosis-Derived Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

ABSTRACT: The need for synergy testing is driven by the necessity to extend the antimicrobial spectrum, reducing drug dosage/toxicity and the development of resistance. Despite the abundance of synergy testing methods, there is the absence of a gold standard and a lack of synergy correlation among methods. The most popular method (checkerboard) is labor-intensive and is not practical for clinical use. Most clinical laboratories use several gradient synergy methods which are quicker/easier to use. This study sought to evaluate three gradient synergy methods (direct overlay, cross, MIC:MIC ratio) with the checkerboard, and compare two interpretative criteria (the fractional inhibitory concentration index (FICI) and susceptibility breakpoint index (SBPI)) regarding these methods. We tested 70 multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, using a tobramycin and ceftazidime combination. The agreement between the checkerboard and gradient methods was 60 to 77% for FICI, while agreements for SBPI that ranged between 67 and 82.86% were statistically significant (p ≤ 0.001). High kappa agreements were observed using SBPI (Ƙ > 0.356) compared to FICI (Ƙ < 0.291) criteria, and the MIC:MIC method demonstrated the highest, albeit moderate, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.542) estimate. Isolate resistance profiles suggest method-dependent synergism for isolates, with ceftazidime susceptibility after increased exposure. The results show that when interpretative criteria are considered, gradient diffusion (especially MIC:MIC) is a valuable and practical method that can inform the treatment of cystic fibrosis patients who are chronically infected with P. aeruginosa.

SUBMITTER: Okoliegbe IN

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8388873 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Objectives: Ceftazidime-avibactam is a novel synthetic beta-lactam + beta-lactamase inhibitor combination. We evaluated the performance of the gradient diffusion strip method and the disk diffusion method for the determination of ceftazidime-avibactam against Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of 302 clinical Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from two centers were conducted by broth microdilution (BMD), gradient diffusion strip method, and disk diffusion method for ceftazidime-avibactam. Using BMD as a gold standard, essential agreement (EA), categorical agreement (CA), major error (ME), and very major error (VME) were determined according to CLSI guidelines. CA and EA rate > 90%, ME rate < 3%, and VME rate < 1.5% were considered as acceptable criteria. Polymerase chain reaction and Sanger sequencing were performed to determine the carbapenem resistance genes of all 302 isolates. Results: A total of 302 strains were enrolled, among which 182 strains were from center 1 and 120 strains were from center 2. A percentage of 18.21% (55/302) of the enrolled isolates were resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam. The CA rates of the gradient diffusion strip method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 100% and 98.65% (73/74), respectively, and the EA rates were 97.37% (222/228) and 98.65% (73/74), respectively. The CA rates of the disk diffusion method for Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa were 100% and 95.95% (71/74), respectively. No VMEs were found by using the gradient diffusion strip method, while the ME rate was 0.40% (1/247). No MEs were found by using the disk diffusion method, but the VME rate was 5.45% (3/55). Therefore, all the parameters of the gradient diffusion strip method were in line with acceptable criteria. For 31 bla KPC , 33 bla NDM , 7 bla IMP , and 2 bla VIM positive isolates, both CA and EA rates were 100%; no MEs or VMEs were detected by either method. For 15 carbapenemase-non-producing resistant isolates, the CA and EA rates of the gradient diffusion strips method were 100%. Whereas the CA rate of the disk diffusion method was 80.00% (12/15), the VME rate was 20.00% (3/15). Conclusion: The gradient diffusion strip method can meet the needs of clinical microbiological laboratories for testing the susceptibility of ceftazidime-avibactam drugs. However, the VME rate > 1.5% (5.45%) by the disk diffusion method. By comparison, the performance of the gradient diffusion strip method was better than that of the disk diffusion method.

Project description:The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Gram-negative pathogens, such as carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, pose an increasing threat to health care. Patients with immunodeficiencies or chronic pulmonary disease, like cystic fibrosis (CF), are particularly vulnerable to Pseudomonas infections and depend heavily on antibiotic therapy. To broaden limited treatment options, this study evaluated the potency of the recently licensed drugs ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA), ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T), and cefiderocol (FDC) as well as two novel preclinical antibiotics, darobactins B (DAR B) and B9 (DAR B9), against clinical P. aeruginosa isolates derived from respiratory samples of CF patients. We observed high levels of resistance to all three newly licensed drugs, with cefiderocol exhibiting the best activity. From the 66 investigated P. aeruginosa isolates, a total of 53% were resistant to CZA, 49% to C/T, and 30% to FDC. Strikingly, 52 of the evaluated isolates were obtained from CF patients prior to market introduction of the drugs. Thus, our results suggest that resistance to CZA, C/T, and FDC may be due to preexisting resistance mechanisms. On the other hand, our two novel preclinical compounds performed better than (CZA and C/T) or close to (FDC) the licensed drugs-most likely due to the novel mode of action. Thus, our results highlight the necessity of global consistency in the area of antibiotic stewardship to prevent AMR from further impairing the potency of antibiotics in clinical practice. Ultimately, this study demonstrates the urgency to support the development of novel antimicrobials, preferably with a new mode of action such as darobactins B and B9, two very promising antimicrobial compounds for the treatment of critically ill patients suffering from multidrug-resistant Gram-negative (MRGN) infections. IMPORTANCE Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) represents an ever increasing threat to the health care system. Even recently licensed drugs are often not efficient for the treatment of infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, like Pseudomonas aeruginosa, a causative agent of lung infections. To address this unmet medical need, innovative antibiotics, which possess a new mode of action, need to be developed. Here, the antibiogram of clinical isolates derived from cystic fibrosis patients was generated and new bicyclic heptapeptides, which inhibit the outer membrane protein BamA, exhibited strong activity, also against multidrug-resistant isolates.

Dataset Information

Antimicrobial Synergy Testing: Comparing the Tobramycin and Ceftazidime Gradient Diffusion Methodology Used in Assessing Synergy in Cystic Fibrosis-Derived Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets