Risk of recurrence of subdural hematoma after EMMA vs surgical drainage - Systematic review and meta-analysis.
Ontology highlight
ABSTRACT: Objective
Chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) is a common and debilitating neurological condition whose treatments, including burr hole drainage and craniotomy, suffer from high rates of recurrence and complication. Embolization of the middle meningeal artery (EMMA) is a promising minimally invasive approach to manage CSDH in a broad set of patients.Methods
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of EMMA, a database search was conducted including the terms "subdural hematoma; embolization; embolized; middle meningeal" was performed and yielded a total of 260 results. Following exclusion based on predefined criteria, a total of four studies were identified and outcomes including recurrence rates and complication rates were extracted for analysis.Results
Four studies including intervention and control groups were included with a total of n = 888 patients. The relative risk of CSDH recurrence in the EMMA (3.5%) compared to control group (23.5%) was significantly reduced when EMMA was performed (risk ratio = 0.17; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.05-0.67). In addition, rates of complication were not significantly different between patients with conventional therapy and those who received EMMA (OR = 0.77; 95 confidence interval (CI) 0.3-1.99).Conclusion
Based on limited data, EMMA reduces the risk of recurrence by 20% compared to surgical treatment for CSDH.
SUBMITTER: Dian J
PROVIDER: S-EPMC8392769 | biostudies-literature |
REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature
Similar Datasets
Project description:Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most studied clinical entities in the neurosurgical literature. Management of cSDH is complicated by its propensity to recurrence. Various factors for the development of recurrence of cSDH have been described in various clinical, epidemiological, and observational studies, yet the evidence available is limited. A systematic review and meta-analysis as per PRISMA guidelines to identify clinical and radiological factors which can predict the development of recurrence in cSDH. A total of 14 studies were included for the systematic review and meta-analysis after a comprehensive search of the online databases. Eight studies were of high methodological quality. Age, use of anticoagulants, obesity, seizure, and liver disease were found to be statistically significant clinical risk factors for the development of recurrence in cSDH. Among the radiological parameters, the internal structure of the hematoma and the width of the hematoma was found to be significant risk factor predicting the development of recurrence. Age >75 years, use of anticoagulation therapy, liver disease, and obesity were significant risk factors for cSDH recurrence. Pneumocephalus, internal architecture of hematoma, bilateral cSDH, the width of hematoma, and the presence of bilateral cSDH are important radiological parameters of the development of recurrent cSDH.
| S-EPMC9505137 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundChronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is a form of intracranial hemorrhage common in older adults. Optimal treatment remains controversial. We conducted a systematic review to identify surgical thresholds, characterize outcomes, and delineate critical considerations in the surgical management of older adults in order to summarize the evidence supporting the best contemporary management of cSDH.MethodsA systematic review exploring surgical management of cSDH among individuals aged 65 years and older was conducting by searching the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for articles in English. Abstracts from articles were read and selected for full-text review according to a priori criteria. Relevant full-text articles were analyzed for bibliographic data, aim, study design, population, interventions, and outcomes.ResultsOf 1473 resultant articles, 21 were included. Surgery rationale was case-by-case for symptomatic patients with cSDH. Surgery was superior to conservative management and promoted equivalent neurologic outcomes and rates of complications. Recurrence and reoperation rates in older adults were similar to younger individuals. Some studies reported higher mortality rates for older adults, while others reported no difference. Anticoagulation or antiplatelet agent use did not seem to be associated with poorer outcomes in older adults.ConclusionsSurgery for cSDH in older adults leads to favorable neurologic outcomes without increased risk of overall complications, recurrence, or reoperation compared to younger patients. However, older adults may be at increased risk for mortality after surgery. It is important to determine use of anticoagulant or antiplatelet agents in older adults to optimally manage patients with cSDH.
| S-EPMC8277090 | biostudies-literature
Project description:IntroductionAcute subdural hematomas (SDH) pose a significant health risk, often resulting from traumatic head injuries. The choice between surgical interventions, craniotomy, and decompressive craniectomy, remains a subject of debate. This meta-analysis aims to compare outcomes and guide clinical decision-making.MethodsFollowing PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive literature search was conducted in databases such as Ovid Medline, PubMed, and Cochrane, up to December 2023. Selection criteria included studies comparing craniotomy and decompressive craniectomy for acute SDH. Data extraction utilized the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Tool, and statistical analysis employed the random-effects model.ResultsThe meta-analysis included 17 studies and 6848 patients. Craniotomy demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality rates (RR 0.80, 95% CI 0.73-0.89, P < 0.0001). GCS scores favored craniotomy for severe cases. GOS outcomes showed a trend favoring craniotomy, particularly in good recovery (RR 1.34, 95% CI 1.04-1.74, P = 0.03). Additional factors explored included co-existing sub-epidural hematoma, mydriasis, extracranial injuries, residual SDH, revision rates, and intracranial pressure.ConclusionThe meta-analysis suggests that craniotomy may be a favorable surgical strategy for acute SDH, displaying a significant decrease in mortality rates and a lower risk of raised intracranial pressure. However, the nuanced nature of outcomes emphasizes the need for a tailored approach, considering broader clinical contexts. Future research should address limitations and provide a basis for well-informed clinical decision-making.
| S-EPMC11017056 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objectives: We aim to compare the effectiveness of different drug treatments in improving recurrence in patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH). Methods: Eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective trials were searched in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase, from database inception to December 2021. After the available studies following inclusion and exclusion criteria were screened, the main outcome measures were strictly extracted. Taking the random-effects model, dichotomous data were determined and extracted by odds ratio (OR) with 95% credible interval (CrI), and a surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was generated to calculate the ranking probability of comparative effectiveness among each drug intervention. Moreover, we used the node-splitting model to evaluate inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of our network meta-analysis (NMA). Funnel plots were used to evaluate publication bias. Results: From the 318 articles found during initial citation screening, 11 RCTs and 3 prospective trials (n = 3,456 participants) were ultimately included in our study. Our NMA results illustrated that atorvastatin + dexamethasone (ATO+DXM) (OR = 0.06, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.89) was the most effective intervention to improve recurrence in patients with CSDH (SUCRA = 89.40%, 95% CrI 0.29, 1.00). Four drug interventions [ATO+DXM (OR = 0.06, 95% CrI 0.01, 0.89), DXM (OR = 0.18, 95% CrI 0.07, 0.41), tranexamic acid (TXA) (OR = 0.26, 95% CrI 0.07, 0.41), and ATO (OR = 0.41, 95% CrI 0.12, 0.90)] achieved statistical significance in improving recurrence in CSDH patients compared with the placebo (PLB) or standard neurosurgical treatment (SNT) group. Conclusion: Our NMA showed that ATO+DXM, DXM, ATO, and TXA had definite efficacy in improving recurrence in CSDH patients. Among them, ATO+DXM is the best intervention for improving recurrence in patients with CSDH in this particular population. Multicenter rigorous designed prospective randomized trials are still needed to evaluate the role of various drug interventions in improving neurological function or outcome. Systematic Review Registration: (https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=299491), identifier (CRD 42022299491).
| S-EPMC8993499 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical entities, especially in the elderly population. Diagnosis is usually established via a head computed tomography, while an increasing number of studies are investigating biomarkers to predict the natural history of cSDH, including progression and recurrence. Surgical evacuation remains the mainstay of treatment in the overwhelming majority of cases. Nevertheless, many controversies are associated with the nuances of surgical treatment. We performed a systematic review of the literature between 2010 and 2022, aiming to identify and address the issues in cSDH surgical management where consensus is lacking. The results show ambiguous data in regard to indication, the timing and type of surgery, the duration of drainage, concomitant membranectomy and the need for embolization of the middle meningeal artery. Other aspects of surgical treatment-such as the use of drainage and its location and number of burr holes-seem to have been adequately clarified: the drainage of hematoma is strongly recommended and the outcome is considered as independent of drainage location or the number of burr holes.
| S-EPMC9498240 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Objective: This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy of adjuvant corticosteroids in managing patients with chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) undergoing surgical intervention. Methods: We searched for eligible studies electronically on the databases of PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. The last date of the search was 15th Jun 2021. Outcomes were pooled to calculate risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Results: Eleven studies were included. Four of them were randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Six studies reported data on good neurological outcomes but with variable definitions. Combining all studies, we noted no statistically significant difference in good neurological outcome with the use of adjuvant corticosteroids (RR: 0.91 95% CI: 0.74, 1.12 I 2 = 92% p = 0.39). Similar results were obtained on subgroup analysis based on definition and study type. However, the use of adjuvant corticosteroids was associated with a significantly reduced risk of recurrence (RR: 0.51 95% CI: 0.40, 0.64 I 2 = 0% p < 0.0001). The meta-analysis also demonstrated no statistically significant difference in mortality rates with the use of adjuvant corticosteroids (RR: 1.01 95% CI: 0.47, 2.21 I 2 = 76% p = 0.97). The results did not differ between RCTs and non-RCTs. Limited studies reported data on complications, and pooled analysis indicated no significant increase in infectious, gastrointestinal, and neurological complications with the use of adjuvant corticosteroids. Conclusion: The use of corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH might be associated with a reduction in recurrence rate. However, corticosteroids do not improve functional outcomes or mortality rates. Future studies should assess the impact of different corticosteroid regimens on patient outcomes, and should use standardized reporting of neurological outcomes with uniform follow-up duration.
| S-EPMC8792049 | biostudies-literature
Project description:Background: Chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH) is one of the most common neurosurgical diseases, while burr-hole drainage is the most frequently used surgical treatment. Strong evidence exists that subdural drain (SDD) placement reduces recurrence rates. However, the insertion of a subperiosteal drain (SPD) was shown to lead to similar recurrence rates and less complications than SDD. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of the literature and conduct a meta-analysis of studies comparing SPD with SDD after burr-hole drainage of cSDH.Methods: Pubmed and Embase databases were searched using a systematic search strategy to identify studies on drain location up to December 2019. Two independent researchers assessed the studies for inclusion and quality. Primary outcome measure was recurrence, while secondary outcome measures were drain misplacement, morbidity, mortality, and clinical outcome. Besides randomized controlled trials (RCT), we included non-randomized prospective cohort studies, as well as retrospective cohort studies. A fixed effects model was used if low heterogeneity (I2 < 50%) was present, otherwise a random effects model was used.Results: Following removal of duplicates, we screened 1109 articles of which 10 articles were included in our qualitative and quantitative analyses. One study was an RCT, three were non-randomized prospective cohort studies, and the remaining articles were retrospective cohort studies or subgroup analysis. In these 10 articles, 1,553 patients were treated with SPD and 1782 patients with SDD. Comparing the recurrence rate of cSDH a significant difference was found between SPD and SDD insertion (11.9 and 12.3%; RR 0.8, 95% CI 0.67–0.97, I2 = 0%, z = ?2.27, p = 0.02). SPD had significantly lower rates of drain misplacement and parenchymal injuries (1.2 and 7.8%; RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07–0.42, I2 = 0%, z = ?3.4, p = 0.0001), as well as morbidity (6.4 and 8.2%; RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.5–0.84, I2 = 44.5%, z = ?3.32, p =0.0009). Mortality rates (5.0 and 4.6%; RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.6–1.14, I2 = 0%, z = ?1.2, p = 0.25) and favorable clinical outcome (89.6 and 88.9%; RR 1.1, 95% CI 0.89–1.24, I2 = 54.2%, t = 0.98, p = 0.40) were comparable in both groups.Conclusion: The insertion of SPD after burr-hole drainage of cSDH showed lower rates of recurrence, drain misplacements and parenchymal injuries, as well as overall morbidity, while clinical outcome and mortality were comparable to SDD. Therefore, the insertion of SPD after surgical drainage of cSDH should be encouraged.
| S-EPMC7189016 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundBurr hole evacuation is a well-established treatment for symptomatic cases with chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). Routinely postoperative catheter is left in the subdural space to drain the residual blood. Drainage obstruction is commonly seen, and it can be related to suboptimal treatment.MethodsTwo groups of patients submitted to cSDH surgery were evaluated in a retrospective non-randomized trial, one group that had conventional subdural drainage (CD group, n = 20) and another group that used an anti-thrombotic catheter (AT group, n = 14). We compared the obstruction rate, amount of drainage and complications. Statistical analyses were done using SPSS (v.28.0).ResultsFor AT and CD groups respectively (median ± IQR), the age was 68.23 ± 26.0 and 70.94 ± 21.5 (p > 0.05); preoperative hematoma width was 18.3 ± 11.0 mm and 20.7 ± 11.7 mm and midline shift was 13.0 ± 9.2 and 5.2 ± 8.0 mm (p = 0.49). Postoperative hematoma width was 12.7 ± 9.2 mm and 10.8 ± 9.0 mm (p < 0.001 intra-groups compared to preoperative) and MLS was 5.2 ± 8.0 mm and 1.5 ± 4.3 mm (p < 0.05 intra-groups). There were no complications related to the procedure including infection, bleed worsening and edema. No proximal obstruction was observed on the AT, but 8/20 (40%) presented proximal obstruction on the CD group (p = 0.006). Daily drainage rates and length of drainage were higher in AT compared to CD: 4.0 ± 1.25 days vs. 3.0 ± 1.0 days (p < 0.001) and 69.86 ± 106.54 vs. 35.00 ± 59.67 mL/day (p = 0.074). Symptomatic recurrence demanding surgery occurred in two patients of CD group (10%) and none in AT group (p = 0.230), after adjusting for MMA embolization, there was still no difference between groups (p = 0.121).ConclusionThe anti-thrombotic catheter for cSDH drainage presented significant less proximal obstruction than the conventional one and higher daily drainage rates. Both methods demonstrated to safe and effective for draining cSDH.
| S-EPMC10248548 | biostudies-literature
Project description:BackgroundVarious factors have been reported as risk factors for chronic subdural hematomas (CSDH) recurrence. However, few studies have quantitatively evaluated the impact of CSDH locations and burr hole positions on recurrence. This study aimed to reveal the relation between CSDH recurrence and the locations of CSDH and burr holes.MethodsInitial single burr hole surgeries for CSDH with a drainage tube between April 2005 and October 2021 at Otemae Hospital were enrolled. Patients' medical records, CSDH volume, and CSDH computed tomography values (CTV) were evaluated. The locations of CSDH and burr holes were assessed using Montreal Neurological Institute coordinates.ResultsA total of 223 patients were enrolled, including 34 patients with bilateral CSDH, resulting in 257 surgeries investigated. The rate of CSDH recurrence requiring reoperation (RrR) was 13.5%. The RrR rate was significantly higher in patients aged ≥76 years, those with bilateral CSDH, and those with postoperative hemiplegia. In RrR, the preoperative CSDH volume was significantly larger, and CTV was significantly smaller. The locations of CSDH had no influence on recurrence. However, in RrR, the locations of burr holes were found to be more lateral and more ventral. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis showed that bilateral CSDH, more ventral burr hole positions, and postoperative hemiplegia were risk factors for recurrence.ConclusionsThe locations of burr holes are associated with CSDH recurrence. In RrR, CSDH profiles tend to show a larger volume and reduced CTV. Hemiplegia after burr hole surgery serves as a warning sign for RrR.
| S-EPMC10189492 | biostudies-literature
Project description:The use of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for chronic subdural hematoma (CSDH) has received considerable attention in recent years. However, there is no conclusive evidence regarding its effectiveness and safety for CSDH. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis and systematic review to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment for the treatment of CSDH. We comprehensively searched electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) to identify relevant trials that investigated the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH, published from inception until May 2021. Outcome measures included recurrence rate, all-cause mortality, good functional outcome, length of hospitalization, and adverse events. We used the Cochrane risk of bias method to evaluate the quality of randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and the Newcastle Ottawa Scale to evaluate the quality of observational studies. We included nine studies, consisting of three RCTs and six observational studies, that compared corticosteroids as an adjuvant treatment to surgery with surgery alone. Pooled results revealed that the risk of recurrence was significantly reduced in patients who received adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery compared to those who underwent surgery alone (relative risk [RR] = 0.52, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.39-0.69, p < 0.00001). However, no statistically significant difference was observed between these groups in all-cause mortality (RR = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.37-2.23, p = 0.83), good functional outcome (RR = 1.03, 95% CI = 0.96-1.10, p = 0.47), length of hospitalization (MD = 0.35, 95% CI = -2.23 to 1.67, p = 0.83), and infection rates (RR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.64-1.53, p = 0.95). Adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery reduce the risk of recurrence of CDSH, but do not improve the all-cause mortality or functional outcome, as compared to surgery alone. These findings support the use of adjuvant corticosteroids with surgery for CSDH patients. Further high-quality RCTs are required to confirm the efficacy and safety of adjuvant corticosteroids in the treatment of CSDH patients.
| S-EPMC8692773 | biostudies-literature