Dataset Information

Impact of Three Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Rate of Elective Cataract Surgeries at a Tertiary Referral Center: A Polish Perspective.

ABSTRACT: The aim of this study was to assess the effect of three waves of the COVID-19 pandemic on the number of elective cataract surgeries. A retrospective single-center consecutive case series study was performed. We included all 12,464 patients who received cataract surgery in the period between 1 January 2016 and 31 May 2021. Monthly numbers of cataract surgeries during the pandemic were compared with monthly numbers in the reference years 2016-2019. In the pandemic the number of cataract surgeries decreased by 53.4%. The monthly numbers during the first, second and third wave of the pandemic were 77.5%, 51.5% and 29.7% lower, respectively, compared with the reference level. No rebound effect was observed once the pandemic restrictions were eased. Simultaneous bilateral cataract surgeries (SBCS) constituted 6.5% of cataract procedures performed in April and May 2021 compared with 0.77% carried out between May 2019 and March 2021. While the pandemic-affected monthly numbers of cataract surgeries tend to increase recently, they are still below the prepandemic level. Patients should be encouraged to weigh the risks of COVID-19-related morbidity and mortality against the benefits of cataract surgery. Reorganization of the logistics of cataract services is advisable with consideration of SBCS as one of the options.

SUBMITTER: Dmuchowska DA

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8393808 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundLong waiting times for elective surgery are common to many publicly funded health systems. Inefficiencies in referral systems in high-income countries are more pronounced than lower and middle-income countries. Primary care practitioners play a major role in determining which patients are referred to surgeon and might represent an opportunity to improve this situation. With conventional methods of referrals, surgery clinics are often overcrowded with non-surgical referrals and surgical patients experience longer waiting times as a consequence. Improving the quality of referral communications should lead to more timely access and better cost-effectiveness for elective surgical care. This review summarises the research evidence for effective interventions within the scope of primary-care referral methods in the surgical care pathway that might shorten waiting time for elective surgeries.MethodsWe searched PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases in December-2019 to January-2020, for articles published after 2013. Eligibility criteria included major elective surgery lists of adult patients, excluding cancer related surgeries. Both randomised and non-randomised controlled studies were eligible. The quality of evidence was assessed using ROBINS-I, AMSTAR 2 and CASP, as appropriate to the study method used. The review presentation was limited to a narrative synthesis because of heterogeneity. The PROSPERO registration number is CRD42019158455.ResultsThe electronic search yielded 7543 records. Finally, nine articles were considered as eligible after deduplication and full article screening. The eligible research varied widely in design, scope, reported outcomes and overall quality, with one randomised trial, two quasi-experimental studies, two longitudinal follow up studies, three systematic reviews and one observational study. All the six original articles were based on referral methods in high-income countries. The included research showed that patient triage and prioritisation at the referral stage improved timely access and increased the number of consultations of surgical patients in clinics.ConclusionsThe available studies included a variety of interventions and were of medium to high quality researches. Managing patient referrals with proper triaging and prioritisation using structured referral formats is likely to be effective in health systems to shorten the waiting times for elective surgeries, specifically in high-income countries.

Project description:Purpose: To explore the incidence, pathogens, treatment, and prognosis of endophthalmitis. Methods: Patients who were diagnosed with endophthalmitis from January 1990 to October 2020 at Peking Union Medical College Hospital were retrospectively reviewed and examined. Subgroup analysis was conducted regarding different initial treatment methods for eyes without concurrent retinal detachment (RD) at presentation. Results: A total of 249 eyes of 233 patients were included in this retrospective study. The most common clinical scenario was exogenous endophthalmitis (60.6%). The most frequent bacteria and fungi were coagulase-negative staphylococci (10.0%) and candida (6.8%), respectively. Retinal with/without choroid detachment was the most common complication after treatment. Patients with endogenous endophthalmitis were more likely to have binocular involvement; there were also more patients with diabetes mellitus or immunosuppressive diseases, and the prognosis of visual acuity (VA) was poorer. There were more eyes with concurrent RD at presentation that underwent serious complications after treatment (p < 0.05), and the visual outcome was worse than that without concurrent RD (p < 0.05). Subgroup analysis was conducted according to different initial treatments in eyes without concurrent RD. Group 1 received pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intravitreal injection of antibiotics (IVI) as initial treatment, Group 2 was initially treated with IVI only, and Group 3 was initially treated with nonsurgical treatment. More eyes that initially received IVI alone and nonsurgical treatment required additional treatments, especially additional PPV. VA in both Groups 1 and 2 significantly improved by the final VA. However, there was no significant difference in final VA between the two groups. There was an insignificant trend that serious posttreatment complications were more common in Group 1. In Group 1, 17 eyes received silicone oil or gas tamponade at the same time, whereas 62 did not. Eyes that were initially treated with PPV + IVI while without tamponade needed more additional treatments and additional IVI. Conclusion: Endophthalmitis is a devastating intraocular disease and requires early intervention. Endogenous endophthalmitis has a poorer visual prognosis than exogenous entity. PPV + IVI as an initial treatment may reduce additional therapy.

Dataset Information

Impact of Three Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Rate of Elective Cataract Surgeries at a Tertiary Referral Center: A Polish Perspective.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets