Dataset Information

Differences in rituximab use between pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists for the treatment of refractory lupus nephritis and renal flare in childhood-onset SLE.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Consensus treatment plans have been developed for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) in childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus. However, patients who do not respond to initial therapy, or who develop renal flare after remission, warrant escalation of treatment. Our objective was to assess current practices of pediatric nephrologists and rheumatologists in North America in treatment of refractory proliferative LN and flare.

Methods

Members of Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatology Research Alliance (CARRA) and the American Society for Pediatric Nephrology (ASPN) were surveyed in November 2015 to assess therapy choices (other than modifying steroid dosing) and level of agreement between rheumatologists and nephrologists for proliferative LN patients. Two cases were presented: (1) refractory disease after induction treatment with corticosteroid and cyclophosphamide (CYC) and (2) nephritis flare after initial response to treatment. Survey respondents chose treatments for three follow up scenarios for each case that varied by severity of presentation. Treatment options included CYC, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), rituximab (RTX), and others, alone or in combination.

Results

Seventy-six respondents from ASPN and foty-one respondents from CARRA represented approximately 15 % of the eligible members from each organization. Treatment choices between nephrologists and rheumatologists were highly variable and received greater than 50 % agreement for an individual treatment choice in only the following 2 of 6 follow up scenarios: 59 % of nephrologists, but only 38 % of rheumatologists, chose increasing dose of MMF in the case of LN refractory to induction therapy with proteinuria, hematuria, and improved serum creatinine. In a follow up scenario showing severe renal flare after achieving remission with induction therapy, 58 % of rheumatologists chose CYC and RTX combination therapy, whereas the top choice for nephrologists (43 %) was CYC alone. Rheumatologists in comparison to nephrologists chose more therapy options that contained RTX in all follow up scenarios except one (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

Therapy choices for pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in the treatment of refractory LN or LN flare were highly variable with rheumatologists more often choosing rituximab. Further investigation is necessary to delineate the reasons behind this finding. This study highlights the importance of collaborative efforts in developing consensus treatment plans for pediatric LN.

SUBMITTER: Gilbert M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8404338 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundTo describe treatment practices for juvenile proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) class III and IV of pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in Germany and Austria in preparation for a treat-to-target treatment protocol in LN.MethodsSurvey study by members of the Society for Pediatric and Adolescent Rheumatology (GKJR) and the German Society for Pediatric Nephrology (GPN) on diagnostics and (concomitant) therapy of LN.ResultsFifty-eight physicians completed the survey. Overall, there was a considerable heterogeneity regarding the suggested diagnostics and management of juvenile proliferative LN. Increased urinary protein excretion, either assessed by 24 h urine collection or spot urine (protein-creatinine ratio), and reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate were specified as important parameters for indication of kidney biopsy to diagnose proliferative LN and monitoring of therapy. Corticosteroids were generally proposed for induction and maintenance therapy, most often in conjunction with either mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or cyclophosphamide (CP) as steroid-sparing immunosuppressants. MMF was clearly preferred over CP for induction therapy of LN class III, whereas CP and MMF were equally proposed for LN class IV. MMF was most often recommended for maintenance therapy in conjunction with oral corticosteroids and continued for at least 3 years and 1 year, respectively, after remission. Hydroxychloroquine was widely accepted as a concomitant measure followed by renin-angiotensin system inhibitors in cases of arterial hypertension and/or proteinuria.ConclusionThe majority of pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists in Germany and Austria propose the use of corticosteroids, most often in combination with either MMF or CP, for treatment of proliferative LN in children. The considerable heterogeneity of responses supports the need for a treat-to-target protocol for juvenile proliferative LN between pediatric rheumatologists and nephrologists.

Project description:IntroductionLong-term data pertaining to childhood-onset lupus nephritis (cLN) remain extremely scarce.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective cohort study of biopsy-proven cLN with onset age <18 years diagnosed from 2001 to 2020 to ascertain the long-term patient and kidney survival rates, and the incidence of advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <60 ml/min per 1.73 m2).ResultsA total of 92 subjects (78 female; age 13.7 ± 3.3 years; all Chinese) were included, with follow-up duration of 10.3 years (interquartile range, 5.8-15.9). Of these, 83 children (90%) had proliferative lupus nephritis (LN) (Class III/IV ± V). Mycophenolate was used for induction in 36%, whereas 34% received cyclophosphamide (CYC); 55% received mycophenolate as maintenance immunosuppression. The rates of complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) at 6 months and 12 months, respectively, were 65% and 20% and 78% and 8%. Two patients died (mortality rate 2.1/1000 patient-years), with a standardized mortality ratio of 22.3. Three patients (3.2%) developed end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), and advanced CKD occurred in 5 patients (5.4%). Survival rates without advanced CKD, ESKD, or death were 96.7%, 94.2%, 92.7%, 83.2% and 83.2% at 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 15 years, and 20 years, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that severe kidney failure necessitating dialysis at presentation (adjusted hazard ratio 37.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.0-355.6, P = 0.002), nonresponse (NR) after 12 months of treatment (adjusted hazard ratio 11.2, 95% CI 2.3-54.9, P = 0.003), and multiple nephritis flares (adjusted hazard ratio 2.6, 95% CI 1.1-6.2, P = 0.03) were predictive of advanced CKD, ESKD, or death. Other adverse outcomes included infections (2.9 episodes/100 patient-years), osteopenia (32%), hypertension (17%), short stature (14%), and avascular necrosis (7%).ConclusionThe long-term outcomes of cLN appeared to have improved in the present era with effective immunosuppression, cautious drug tapering, and assurance of medication adherence. There is still an unacceptably high prevalence of adverse outcomes.