Dataset Information

Line- and Point-Focused Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy for Achilles Tendinopathy: A Placebo-Controlled RCT Study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) is a widely considered treatment option for Achilles tendinopathy. Line-focused ESWT is a novel technique treating a larger tendon area than point-focused ESWT. Monitoring capacities of clinical symptoms with ultrasound under ESWT treatment are unknown.

Hypothesis

Point- and line-focused ESWT have a superior outcome than placebo ESWT. ESWT leads to morphological tendon changes detectable with ultrasound.

Study design

Single-blinded placebo-controlled randomized contolled trial.

Level of evidence

Level 1.

Methods

The study was conducted in 3 cohorts, namely ESWT point (n = 21), ESWT line (n = 24), and ESWT placebo (n = 21). Victorian Institute of Sports Assessment-Achilles (VISA-A) score was measured before the intervention (T0), after 6 weeks (T1), and after 24 weeks (T2). All cohorts performed daily physiotherapy for 24 weeks and received 4 sessions of point-focused, line-focused, or placebo ESWT in the first 6 weeks. Ultrasound was performed with B-mode, power Doppler, shear wave elastography (SWE) at T0 and T2 and with ultrasound tissue characterization (UTC) at T0, T1, and T2. Data were analyzed with a mixed analysis of variance and t test.

Results

There was a significant VISA-A improvement over time for all groups (P < 0.001). ESWT point had the strongest VISA-A score improvement +23 (ESWT line: +18; ESWT placebo: +15), but there was no significant interaction between time and any of the groups: F(4, 116) = 1.393; P = 0.24. UTC, power Doppler, and B-mode could not show significant alterations over time. SWE revealed a significant increase of elastic properties for ESWT point in the insertion (t = -3.113, P = 0.03) and midportion (t = -2.627, P = 0.02) over time.

Conclusion

There is a significant VISA-A score improvement for all study groups without a statistically significant benefit for ESWT point or ESWT line compared with ESWT placebo. Tendon adaptation could only be detected with SWE for ESWT point.

Clinical relevance

The present study could not detect any statistically relevant effect of ESWT compared to placebo. SWE is able to demonstrate tendon adaptation.

SUBMITTER: Gatz M

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8404720 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundExtracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) has shown benefits in patients with nonunion or delayed bone healing, pseudarthrosis, and avascular necrosis of bone. Until now, these effects were explained by the release of growth factors, activation of cells, and microfractures occurring after ESWT. Microcirculation is an important factor in bone healing and may be compromised in fractured scaphoids because its blood supply comes from the distal end. Due to this perfusion pattern, the scaphoid bone is prone to nonunion after fracture. The ability of ESWT to enhance microcirculation parameters in soft tissue was of interest to determine if it improves microcirculation in the scaphoid.Questions/purposes(1) Does capillary blood flow increase after a single session of ESWT in the scaphoid? (2) Do oxygen saturation in the bone and postcapillary venous filling pressure increase after a single session of ESWT in the scaphoid?MethodsESWT (0.3 mJ/mm, 8Hz, 1000 impulses) was applied to the intact scaphoid of 20 volunteers who were without wrist pain and without any important metabolic disorders. Mean age was 43 ± 14 years, 12 men and eight women (40% of total). Volunteers were recruited from January 2017 to May 2017. No anesthetic was given before application of ESWT. An innovative probe designed for measurements in bone by compressing soft tissue and combining laser-Doppler flowmetry and spectrophotometry was used to noninvasively measure parameters of microcirculation in the scaphoid. Blood flow, oxygenation, and venous filling pressure were assessed before and at 1, 2, 3, 5, 10, 15, 20, 25, and 30 minutes after ESWT application. Room temperature, humidity, ambient light and measuring sequences were kept consistent. A paired t-test was performed to compare experimental data with baseline (p < 0.05 taken as significant).ResultsAt baseline, capillary blood flow of the bone was 108 ± 46 arbitrary units (AUs) (86 to 130). After treatment with ESWT, it was 129 ± 44 AUs (106 to 150; p = 0.011, percentage change of 19 %) at 1 minute, 138 ± 46 AUs (116 to 160; p = 0.002, percentage change of 28%) at 2 minutes, 146 ± 54 AUs (121 to 171; p = 0.002, percentage change of 35%) at 3 minutes and 150 ± 52 AUs (126 to 174; p < 0.001, percentage change of 39%) at 5 minutes. It remained elevated until the end of the measuring period at 30 minutes after treatment at 141 ± 42 AUs (121 to 161; p = 0.002) versus baseline). Oxygen saturation and postcapillary venous filling pressure in bone showed no change, with the numbers available.ConclusionsA single session of ESWT increased capillary blood flow in the scaphoid during measuring time of 30 minutes. Bone oxygenation and postcapillary venous filling pressure, however, did not change. Because increased oxygenation is needed for improved bone healing, it remains unclear if a sole increase in capillary blood flow can have clinical benefits. As the measuring period was limited to only 30 minutes, bone oxygenation and postcapillary filling pressure may subsequently show change only after the measuring-period ended.Clinical relevanceFurther studies need to evaluate if increased capillary blood flow can be sustained for longer periods and if bone oxygenation and postcapillary venous filling pressure remain unchanged even after prolonged or repetitive ESWT applications. Moreover, clinical studies must validate if increased microcirculation has a positive impact on bone healing and to determine if ESWT can be therapeutically useful on scaphoid fractures and nonunions.

Project description:BACKGROUND:There is no consensus regarding the treatment of Achilles insertional tendinopathies. Eccentric training remains the main choice in the conservative treatment of this illness; however, the good results in the management of non-insertional Achilles tendinopathy were not replicated in the insertional condition. Low energy shock wave therapy has been described as an alternative to these patients, but has yet to be empirically tested. HYPOTHESIS:Shock wave therapy, adjunctive to the eccentric strengthening protocol, will improve measures of pain and function. DESIGN:Double blind, placebo-controlled, parallel groups, randomised clinical trial. MATERIALS AND METHODS:93 patients with a diagnosis of chronic insertional tendinopathy, referred from primary or secondary healthcare services, will be assessed and enrolled in this study. They will be divided into two groups (randomised by sequentially numbered identical envelopes, which will be administered serially to participants), one containing the combination of low energy shock wave and eccentric exercises, as treatment and the other comprehending the exercises and the placebo treatment (an apparatus placed in the therapeutic head). The assessments will occur in 2, 4, 6, 12 and 24?weeks. Patients will be evaluated primarily by the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment-Achilles questionnaire and secondarily by the visual analogue scale, Algometry, the American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society scale, the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score and the 12-item Short Form Health Survey. We will use comparison of two proportions via relative frequency analysis, the Pearson Correlation the ?2 test and the analysis of variance for statistical analyses. DISCUSSION:This study intends to demonstrate if the association of the eccentric exercise programme with the shock wave therapy can produce good results regarding the treatment of the Achilles insertional tendinopathy. In an attempt to prevent the high costs and complications associated with the surgical intervention, we will try to prove this combination as a viable therapeutic option in the conservative management of this prevalent condition. The strengths of the study are the design and the novelty of the combination of methods. The main limitation is the short follow-up course. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION:The study is registered in the Clinical Trials database (protocol number: 8094833648737701) and was approved by the University Ethics Committee (number: 1373481). TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER:8094833648737701 (NCT02757664); Pre-results.