Dataset Information

Predictability of polygenic risk score for progression to dementia and its interaction with APOE ε4 in mild cognitive impairment.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The combinatorial effect of multiple genetic factors calculated as a polygenic risk score (PRS) has been studied to predict disease progression to Alzheimer's disease (AD) from mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Previous studies have investigated the performance of PRS in the prediction of disease progression to AD by including and excluding single nucleotide polymorphisms within the region surrounding the APOE gene. These studies may have missed the APOE genotype-specific predictability of PRS for disease progression to AD.

Methods

We analyzed 732 MCI from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative cohort, including those who progressed to AD within 5 years post-baseline (n = 270) and remained stable as MCI (n = 462). The predictability of PRS including and excluding the APOE region (PRS_+APOE and PRS_-APOE) on the conversion to AD and its interaction with the APOE ε4 carrier status were assessed using Cox regression analyses.

Results

PRS_+APOE (hazard ratio [HR] 1.468, 95% CI 1.335-1.615) and PRS_-APOE (HR 1.293, 95% CI 1.157-1.445) were both associated with a significantly increased risk of MCI progression to dementia. The interaction between PRS_+APOE and APOE ε4 carrier status was significant with a P-value of 0.0378. The association of PRSs with the progression risk was stronger in APOE ε4 non-carriers (PRS_+APOE: HR 1.710, 95% CI 1.244-2.351; PRS_-APOE: HR 1.429, 95% CI 1.182-1.728) than in APOE ε4 carriers (PRS_+APOE: HR 1.167, 95% CI 1.005-1.355; PRS_-APOE: HR 1.172, 95% CI 1.020-1.346).

Conclusions

PRS could predict the conversion of MCI to dementia with a stronger association in APOE ε4 non-carriers than APOE ε4 carriers. This indicates PRS as a potential genetic predictor particularly for MCI with no APOE ε4 alleles.

SUBMITTER: Pyun JM

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8406896 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BACKGROUND:The previously described and validated Erlangen Score (ES) algorithm enables interpretation of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD), ordering them on an ordinal scale: from neurochemically normal (ES?=?0) through improbable AD (ES?=?1), possible AD (ES?=?2 or 3), to probable AD (ES?=?4). Here we assess the accuracy of the ES in predicting hazards of progression from the mild cognitive impairment (MCI) stage of AD to the dementia stage of the disease (Alzheimer's disease dementia (ADD)) in a novel, single-center cohort. METHODS:Baseline CSF biomarkers (amyloid beta (A?) 1-42, A?42/40, Tau, and pTau181), interpreted according to the ES, were used to estimate time to progression from the MCI stage of AD to ADD, conditional on age, gender, APOE ?4 genotype, and Mini Mental State Examination score in 144 MCI subjects, using the Extended Cox Model; the subjects were followed-up until they developed dementia or until they had been cognitively stable for at least 2?years. In addition, ES distributions were studied in 168 ADD cases and 66 neurologic controls. Further, we stratified MCI patients into those who progressed to ADD faster (within 3 years, n?=?47) and those who progressed slower (n?=?74). RESULTS:The distributions of the ES categories across the four diagnostic groups (Controls, MCI-Stable, MCI-AD, and ADD) were highly significantly different (Kruskal-Wallis ?2(df?=?3)?=?151.4, p?<?0.001), with significant contrasts between each pair (p?<?0.005), except between the ADD and the MCI-AD groups (p?=?1.0). MCI patients with ES?=?2 or 3 had 6-8 times higher hazards to progress to ADD compared to patients with ES?=?0 or 1 in the first 3 follow-up years, and then their hazards decreased to those of the group with ES?=?0 or 1. Patients with ES?=?4 had hazards 8-12 times higher compared to the ES?=?0 or 1 group. Faster progressors with ES?=?2 or 3 had, in comparison to slower progressors, significantly lower A?1-42, A?1-40, and A?42/40, but comparable Tau and pTau181. A highly significant difference of the ES distributions between these two groups was observed (p?<?0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Our current results reconfirm and extend the conclusions of the previously published report that the Erlangen Score is a useful tool facilitating interpretation of a complex pattern of the CSF AD biomarkers.

Project description:BackgroundMild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment, no dementia, are emerging terms that encompass the clinical state between normal cognition and dementia in elderly people. Controversy surrounds their characterization, definition and application in clinical practice. In this article, we provide physicians with practical guidance on the definition, diagnosis and treatment of mild cognitive impairment and cognitive impairment, no dementia, based on recommendations from the Third Canadian Consensus Conference on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Dementia, held in March 2006.MethodsWe developed evidence-based guidelines using systematic literature searches, with specific criteria for study selection and quality assessment, and a clear and transparent decision-making process. We selected studies published from January 1996 to December 2005 that had mild cognitive impairment or cognitive impairment, no dementia, as the outcome. Subsequent to the conference, we searched for additional articles published between January 2006 and January 2008. We graded the strength of evidence using the criteria of the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care.ResultsWe identified 2483 articles, of which 314 were considered to be relevant and of good or fair quality. From a synthesis of the evidence in these studies, we made 16 recommendations. In brief, family physicians should be aware that most types of dementia are preceded by a recognizable phase of mild cognitive decline. They should be familiar with the concepts of mild cognitive impairment and of cognitive impairment, no dementia. Patients with these conditions should be closely monitored because of their increased risk for dementia. Leisure activities, cognitive stimulation and physical activity could be promoted as part of a healthy lifestyle in elderly people and those with mild cognitive impairment. Vascular risk factors should be treated optimally. No other specific therapies can yet be recommended.InterpretationPhysicians will increasingly see elderly patients with mild memory loss, and learning an approach to diagnosing states such as mild cognitive impairment is now warranted. Close monitoring for progression to dementia, promotion of a healthy lifestyle and treatment of vascular risk factors are recommended for the management of patients with mild cognitive impairment.