Browse
Submit Data
Databases
API
Help

Dataset Information

31 Views

0 Connections

0 Citations

0 Reanalyses

0 Downloads

Omics score: 0

Reflection on modern methods: shared-parameter models for longitudinal studies with missing data.

ABSTRACT: A primary goal of longitudinal studies is to examine trends over time. Reported results from these studies often depend on strong, unverifiable assumptions about the missing data. Whereas the risk of substantial bias from missing data is widely known, analyses exploring missing-data influences are commonly done either ad hoc or not at all. This article outlines one of the three primary recognized approaches for examining missing-data effects that could be more widely used, i.e. the shared-parameter model (SPM), and explains its purpose, use, limitations and extensions. We additionally provide synthetic data and reproducible research code for running SPMs in SAS, Stata and R programming languages to facilitate their use in practice and for teaching purposes in epidemiology, biostatistics, data science and related fields. Our goals are to increase understanding and use of these methods by providing introductions to the concepts and access to helpful tools.

SUBMITTER: Griswold ME

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8407871 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Json Xml

Similar Datasets

Reflection on modern methods: combining weights for confounding and missing data.

Project description:Inverse probability weights are increasingly used in epidemiological analysis, and estimation and application of weights to address a single bias are well discussed in the literature. Weights to address multiple biases simultaneously (i.e. a combination of weights) have almost exclusively been discussed related to marginal structural models in longitudinal settings where treatment weights (estimated first) are combined with censoring weights (estimated second). In this work, we examine two examples of combined weights for confounding and missingness in a time-fixed setting in which outcome or confounder data are missing, and the estimand is the marginal expectation of the outcome under a time-fixed treatment. We discuss the identification conditions, construction of combined weights and how assumptions of the missing data mechanisms affect this construction. We use a simulation to illustrate the estimation and application of the weights in the two examples. Notably, when only outcome data are missing, construction of combined weights is straightforward; however, when confounder data are missing, we show that in general we must follow a specific estimation procedure which entails first estimating missingness weights and then estimating treatment probabilities from data with missingness weights applied. However, if treatment and missingness are conditionally independent, then treatment probabilities can be estimated among the complete cases.

| S-EPMC9082798 | biostudies-literature

Reflection on modern methods: Dynamic prediction using joint models of longitudinal and time-to-event data.

Project description:Individualized prediction is a hallmark of clinical medicine and decision making. However, most existing prediction models rely on biomarkers and clinical outcomes available at a single time. This is in contrast to how health states progress and how physicians deliver care, which relies on progressively updating a prognosis based on available information. With the use of joint models of longitudinal and survival data, it is possible to dynamically adjust individual predictions regarding patient prognosis. This article aims to introduce the reader to the development of dynamic risk predictions and to provide the necessary resources to support their implementation and assessment, such as adaptable R code, and the theory behind the methodology. Furthermore, measures to assess the predictive performance of the derived predictions and extensions that could improve the predictions are presented. We illustrate personalized predictions using an online dataset consisting of patients with chronic liver disease (primary biliary cirrhosis).

| S-EPMC8783548 | biostudies-literature

Bayesian analysis of longitudinal dyadic data with informative missing data using a dyadic shared-parameter model.

Project description:Analyzing longitudinal dyadic data is a challenging task due to the complicated correlations from repeated measurements and within-dyad interdependence, as well as potentially informative (or non-ignorable) missing data. We propose a dyadic shared-parameter model to analyze longitudinal dyadic data with ordinal outcomes and informative intermittent missing data and dropouts. We model the longitudinal measurement process using a proportional odds model, which accommodates the within-dyad interdependence using the concept of the actor-partner interdependence effects, as well as dyad-specific random effects. We model informative dropouts and intermittent missing data using a transition model, which shares the same set of random effects as the longitudinal measurement model. We evaluate the performance of the proposed method through extensive simulation studies. As our approach relies on some untestable assumptions on the missing data mechanism, we perform sensitivity analyses to evaluate how the analysis results change when the missing data mechanism is misspecified. We demonstrate our method using a longitudinal dyadic study of metastatic breast cancer.

| S-EPMC5568500 | biostudies-literature

A comparison of multiple imputation methods for missing data in longitudinal studies.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Multiple imputation (MI) is now widely used to handle missing data in longitudinal studies. Several MI techniques have been proposed to impute incomplete longitudinal covariates, including standard fully conditional specification (FCS-Standard) and joint multivariate normal imputation (JM-MVN), which treat repeated measurements as distinct variables, and various extensions based on generalized linear mixed models. Although these MI approaches have been implemented in various software packages, there has not been a comprehensive evaluation of the relative performance of these methods in the context of longitudinal data. METHOD:Using both empirical data and a simulation study based on data from the six waves of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (N?=?4661), we investigated the performance of a wide range of MI methods available in standard software packages for investigating the association between child body mass index (BMI) and quality of life using both a linear regression and a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS:In this paper, we have identified and compared 12 different MI methods for imputing missing data in longitudinal studies. Analysis of simulated data under missing at random (MAR) mechanisms showed that the generally available MI methods provided less biased estimates with better coverage for the linear regression model and around half of these methods performed well for the estimation of regression parameters for a linear mixed model with random intercept. With the observed data, we observed an inverse association between child BMI and quality of life, with available data as well as multiple imputation. CONCLUSION:Both FCS-Standard and JM-MVN performed well for the estimation of regression parameters in both analysis models. More complex methods that explicitly reflect the longitudinal structure for these analysis models may only be needed in specific circumstances such as irregularly spaced data.

| S-EPMC6292063 | biostudies-literature

Joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data measured on nested timescales by using shared parameter models: an application to fecundity data.

Project description:We consider the joint modelling, analysis and prediction of a longitudinal binary process and a discrete time-to-event outcome. We consider data from a prospective pregnancy study, which provides day level information regarding the behaviour of couples attempting to conceive. Reproductive epidemiologists are particularly interested in developing a model for individualized predictions of time to pregnancy (TTP). A couple's intercourse behaviour should be an integral part of such a model and is one of the main focuses of the paper. In our motivating data, the intercourse observations are a long series of binary data with a periodic probability of success and the amount of available intercourse data is a function of both the menstrual cycle length and TTP. Moreover, these variables are dependent and observed on different, and nested, timescales (TTP is measured in menstrual cycles whereas intercourse is measured on days within a menstrual cycle) further complicating its analysis. Here, we propose a semiparametric shared parameter model for the joint modelling of the binary longitudinal data (intercourse behaviour) and the discrete survival outcome (TTP). Further, we develop couple-based dynamic predictions for the intercourse profiles, which in turn are used to assess the risk for subfertility (i.e. TTP longer than six menstrual cycles).

| S-EPMC4844229 | biostudies-literature

Modeling Change in the Presence of Non-Randomly Missing Data: Evaluating A Shared Parameter Mixture Model.

Project description:In longitudinal research, interest often centers on individual trajectories of change over time. When there is missing data, a concern is whether data are systematically missing as a function of the individual trajectories. Such a missing data process, termed random coefficient-dependent missingness, is statistically non-ignorable and can bias parameter estimates obtained from conventional growth models that assume missing data are missing at random. This paper describes a shared-parameter mixture model (SPMM) for testing the sensitivity of growth model parameter estimates to a random coefficient-dependent missingness mechanism. Simulations show that the SPMM recovers trajectory estimates as well as or better than a standard growth model across a range of missing data conditions. The paper concludes with practical advice for longitudinal data analysts.

| S-EPMC4084916 | biostudies-literature

Shared parameter models for joint analysis of longitudinal and survival data with left truncation due to delayed entry - Applications to cystic fibrosis.

Project description:Many longitudinal studies observe time to occurrence of a clinical event such as death, while also collecting serial measurements of one or more biomarkers that are predictive of the event, or are surrogate outcomes of interest. Joint modeling can be used to examine the relationship between the biomarker and the event, and also as a way of adjusting analyses of the biomarker for non-ignorable dropout. In settings such as registry studies, an additional complexity is caused when follow-up of subjects is delayed, referred to as left-truncation of follow-up in the survival analysis setting. If not adjusted for, this can cause bias in estimation of parameters of the survival distribution for the clinical event and in parameters of the longitudinal outcome such as the profile or rate of change over time because subjects may die or have the clinical event before follow-up starts. This paper illustrates how a broad class of shared parameter models can be used to jointly model a time to event outcome along with a longitudinal marker using available nonlinear mixed modeling software, when follow-up times are left truncated. Methods are applied to jointly model survival and decline in lung function in cystic fibrosis patients.

| S-EPMC6456442 | biostudies-literature

Bayesian pattern-mixture models for dropout and intermittently missing data in longitudinal data analysis.

Project description:Valid inference can be drawn from a random-effects model for repeated measures that are incomplete if whether the data are missing or not, known as missingness, is independent of the missing data. Data that are missing completely at random or missing at random are two data types for which missingness is ignorable. Given ignorable missingness, statistical inference can proceed without addressing the source of the missing data in the model. If the missingness is not ignorable, however, recommendations are to fit multiple models that represent different plausible explanations of the missing data. A popular choice in methods for evaluating nonignorable missingness is a random-effects pattern-mixture model that extends a random-effects model to include one or more between-subjects variables that represent fixed patterns of missing data. Generally straightforward to implement, a fixed pattern-mixture model is one among several options for assessing nonignorable missingness, and when it is used as the sole model to address nonignorable missingness, understanding the impact of missingness is greatly limited. This paper considers alternatives to a fixed pattern-mixture model for nonignorable missingness that are generally straightforward to fit and encourage researchers to give greater attention to the possible impact of nonignorable missingness in longitudinal data analysis. Patterns of both monotonic and non-monotonic (intermittently) missing data are addressed. Empirical longitudinal psychiatric data are used to illustrate the models. A small Monte Carlo data simulation study is presented to help illustrate the utility of such methods.

| S-EPMC10990982 | biostudies-literature

Reflection on modern methods: causal inference considerations for heterogeneous disease etiology.

Project description:Molecular pathological epidemiology research provides information about pathogenic mechanisms. A common study goal is to evaluate whether the effects of risk factors on disease incidence vary between different disease subtypes. A popular approach to carrying out this type of research is to implement a multinomial regression in which each of the non-zero values corresponds to a bona fide disease subtype. Then, heterogeneity in the exposure effects across subtypes is examined by comparing the coefficients of the exposure between the different subtypes. In this paper, we explain why this common method potentially cannot recover causal effects, even when all confounders are measured, due to a particular type of selection bias. This bias can be explained by recognizing that the multinomial regression is equivalent to a series of logistic regressions; each compares cases of a certain subtype to the controls. We further explain how this bias arises using directed acyclic graphs and we demonstrate the potential magnitude of the bias by analysis of a hypothetical data set and by a simulation study.

| S-EPMC8485684 | biostudies-literature

Simple descriptive missing data indicators in longitudinal studies with attrition, intermittent missing data and a high number of follow-ups.

Project description:Missing data in longitudinal studies may constitute a source of bias. We suggest three simple missing data indicators for the initial phase of getting an overview of the missingness pattern in a dataset with a high number of follow-ups. Possible use of the indicators is exemplified in two datasets allowing wave nonresponse; a Norwegian dataset of 420 subjects examined at 21 occasions during 6.5 years and a Dutch dataset of 350 subjects with ten repeated measurements over a period of 35 years.The indicators Last response (the timing of last response), Retention (the number of responded follow-ups), and Dispersion (the evenness of the distribution of responses) are introduced. The proposed indicators reveal different aspects of the missing data pattern, and may give the researcher a better insight into the pattern of missingness in a study with several follow-ups, as a starting point for analyzing possible bias. Although the indicators are positively correlated to each other, potential predictors of missingness can have a different relationship with different indicators leading to a better understanding of the missing data mechanism in longitudinal studies. These indictors may be useful descriptive tools when starting to look into a longitudinal dataset with many follow-ups.

| S-EPMC5809924 | biostudies-literature

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

OmicsDI is an Elixir interoperability service. Learn more ›

Tweets

OmicsDI Databases

PRIDE
PeptideAtlas
MassIVE
JPOST Repository
Physiome Model Repository

EGA
EVA
ENA
LINCS
PAXDB
Cell Collective

MetaboLights
Metabolomics Workbench
MetabolomeExpress
GNPS
BioModels
FAIRDOMHub

ArrayExpress
dbGaP
ExpressionAtlas
GEO
NODE

Information

Databases
Help
API
Contact us
Code on GitHub
Terms of use
Submit Data