Dataset Information

Surgically treated acromegaly patients have a similar quality of life whether controlled by surgery or requiring additional medical therapy (QuaLAT Study).

ABSTRACT:

Purpose

There is no consensus on quality of life (QOL) in patients with acromegaly requiring medical treatment after surgery compared with those achieving remission by surgery alone.

Methods

QuaLAT is a cross-sectional study comparing QOL in surgery-only treated acromegaly patients versus those requiring medical treatment post-surgery. Patients attending clinics were identified and divided into-Group 1: patients who had surgery only and were in biochemical remission, Group 2: all patients on medical treatment post-surgery, Group 3: patients from Group 2 with biochemical control. Participants were asked to fill three questionnaires; Acromegaly Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACROQOL), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF36), and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS).

Results

There were 32 patients in Group 1 and 25 in Group 2. There was no difference in QOL scores between groups 1 and 2, as measured by ACROQOL (mean difference [MD] = - 2.5, 95% CI - 16.6 to 11.6; p = 0.72), SF36v2 [Physical component score (PCS) MD = - 4.9, 95% CI - 10.9 to 1.2; p = 0.12; mental component score MD = - 3.0, 95% CI - 10.5 to 4.4; p = 0.44], or FSS (MD = - 0.004, 95% CI - 1.14 to 1.33; p = 0.1). Comparison between groups 1 and 3 however showed that PCS (and 3 subdomains) was significantly better in group 3 (MD = - 8.3, 95% CI - 14.8 to -1.8; p = 0.01). All three QOL scores were lower when compared with healthy controls.

Conclusions

Medical treatment not only achieves a QOL comparable to surgery, it may also be associated with better QOL in physical subdomains. When compared with healthy controls, QOL remains worse in treated acromegaly patients compared to controls.

SUBMITTER: Arshad MF

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8416856 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Health-related quality of life (HRQOL) is often reduced with glaucoma, but associated factors are poorly understood.To determine factors associated with reduced HRQOL in medically and surgically treated patients with glaucoma.Prospective cohort study at a tertiary referral glaucoma practice, with 160 consecutive, prospectively enrolled medically or surgically treated adult patients with glaucoma.All patients completed 2 HRQOL questionnaires (the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire and the Adult Strabismus-20 questionnaire [AS-20]). Thirty-six patients had undergone glaucoma drainage device surgery, 51 underwent trabeculectomy, and 73 were medically treated. Factors considered for association with HRQOL in multiple regression analyses were age, sex, best-eye and worst-eye mean deviation on Humphrey visual fields, treatment modality, best-eye and worst-eye visual acuity, and diplopia.The mean (SD) age of participants was 69 (13) years, 63% were female, 97% were white, 93% were not Hispanic, and the mean deviation (SD) was -13 (10) dB. Reduced HRQOL was associated with worse diplopia (Diplopia Questionnaire score) on 6 subscales (range of partial r2 [rp2], 0.207-0.069). Reduced HRQOL was associated with lower best-eye mean deviation on 5 of 6 subscales (rp2 range, 0.379-0.027), lower worst-eye mean deviation on 4 of 6 (rp2 range, 0.242-0.046), treatment group on 3 of 6 (rp2 range, 0.190-0.025), lower worst-eye visual acuity on 5 of 6 (rp2 range, 0.063-0.025), lower best-eye visual acuity on 2 of 6 (rp2 range, 0.032-0.017), and younger age on 2 of 6 (rp2 range, 0.021-0.014). In adjusted analyses, glaucoma drainage device was associated with worse HRQOL in 3 AS-20 subscales compared with trabeculectomy and 2 AS-20 subscales compared with medical. Differences ranged from -14.7 to -7.4, with half the absolute magnitude of the full range of the 95% CI ranging from 9.2 to 5.7.Our findings support the assertion that reduced HRQOL is common in surgically and medically treated patients with glaucoma. Overall, poor HRQOL in patients with glaucoma is moderately associated with worse diplopia, lower mean deviation on visual field testing in either eye, poorer visual acuity in either eye, treatment type, and younger age. Previous glaucoma drainage device surgery was specifically associated with poorer HRQOL compared with trabeculectomy or medical treatment. Psychosocial effects of glaucoma drainage device should be considered when counseling patients with glaucoma.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Clinical behaviour of atypical meningiomas is not uniform. While, as a group, they exhibit a high recurrence rate, some pursue a more benign course, whereas others progress early. We aim to investigate the imaging and pathological factors that predict risk of early tumour progression and to determine whether early progression is related to outcome. METHODS:Adult patients with WHO grade II meningioma treated in three regional referral centres between 2007 and 2014 were included. MRI and pathology characteristics were assessed. Gross total resection (GTR) was defined as Simpson 1-3. Recurrence was classified into early and late (??24 vs. >?24 months). RESULTS:Among the 220 cases, 37 (16.8%) patients progressed within 24 months of operation. Independent predictors of early progression were subtotal resection (STR) (p?=?0.005), parafalcine/parasagittal location (p?=?0.015), peritumoural oedema (p?=?0.027) and mitotic index (MI)?>?7 (p?=?0.007). Adjuvant radiotherapy was negatively associated with early recurrence (p?=?0.046). Thirty-two per cent of patients with residual tumour and 26% after GTR received adjuvant radiotherapy. There was a significantly lower proportion of favourable outcomes at last follow-up (mRS 0-1) in patients with early recurrence (p?=?0.001). CONCLUSIONS:Atypical meningiomas are a heterogeneous group of tumours with 16.8% patients having recurrence within 24 months of surgery. Residual tumour, parafalcine/parasagittal location, peritumoural oedema and a MI?>?7 were all independently associated with early recurrence. As administration of adjuvant radiotherapy was not protocolised in this cohort, any conclusions about benefits of irradiation of WHO grade II meningiomas should be viewed with caution. Patients with early recurrence had worse neurological outcome. While histological and imaging characteristics provide some prognostic value, further molecular characterisation of atypical meningiomas is warranted to aid clinical decision making.