Dataset Information

Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Who Underwent Pulmonary Metastasectomy with Curative Intent: A Brazilian Experience.

ABSTRACT:

Background

We aimed to identify clinicopathological and molecular features associated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after pulmonary metastasectomy for metastatic colorectal cancer in a retrospective cohort in Brazil.

Materials and methods

We did a retrospective review of thoracic surgeries performed in a single large academic hospital in Brazil from January 1985 to September 2019. Demographics, previously described prognostic factors, and clinicopathological and molecular characteristics were abstracted. Univariate Cox regression was performed for each variable, and, when significant, data were dichotomized to provide clinically meaningful thresholds.

Results

Records from 698 patients were reviewed. Fifty-eight patients underwent pulmonary metastasectomy with curative intent. Of those, 53.4% had a single metastatic lesion. The median size of the largest lesion was 1.5 cm. Results of RAS, RAF, and mismatch repair testing and of cytokeratin 20 (CK20) and CDX2 testing were available for 13.8% and 58.6% of the sample, respectively. Median PFS was 14 months, median OS was 58 months, and 5-year survival was 49.8%. Unfavorable prognostic factors for OS included disease-free interval (DFI) <24 months, synchronous presentation, size of the largest lesion ≥2 cm, and loss of CK20 expression. Presenting with more than one lesion was prognostic for PFS but not for OS.

Conclusion

In this Brazilian cohort, our findings corroborate existing data supporting DFI, synchronous presentation, and number and size of lesions as prognostic factors. Furthermore, we found that loss of CK20 expression may be associated with more aggressive disease and shorter OS. Additional molecular prognostic factors after pulmonary metastasectomy for colorectal cancer should be further explored.

Implications for practice

This study consolidates disease-free interval, synchronous presentation, and number and size of lesions as clinically relevant data that may help guide therapy for patients with colorectal cancer and lung metastases who are candidates for curative-intent metastasectomy. Additionally, in this sample, lack of cytokeratin 20 expression in metastases was associated with shorter progression-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that biomarkers also may have a role in guiding therapy in this setting and that additional biomarkers should be further explored.

SUBMITTER: Gossling GCL

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8417851 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundThe prognostic value of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) in colorectal cancer patients has remained inconsistent between nonmetastatic and metastatic settings. So far, very few studies have included LDH in the prognostic analysis of curative-intent surgery for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).Patients and methodsFive hundred and eighty consecutive metastatic colorectal cancer patients who underwent curative-intent CRLM resection from Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (434 patients) and Sun Yat-sen University Sixth Affiliated Hospital (146 patients) in 2000-2019 were retrospectively collected. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. Cox regression model was performed to identify the prognostic values of preoperative serum LDH levels and other clinicopathology variables. A modification of the established Fong CRS scoring system comprising LDH was developed within this Chinese population.ResultsAt the median follow-up time of 60.5 months, median OS was 59.5 months in the pooled cohort. In the multivariate analysis, preoperative LDH >upper limit of normal (250 U/L) was the strongest independent prognostic factor for OS (HR 1.73, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.22-2.44; p < 0.001). Patients with elevated LDH levels showed impaired OS than patients with normal LDH levels (27.6 months vs. 68.8 months). Five-year survival rates were 53.7% and 22.5% in the LDH-normal group and LDH-high group, respectively. Similar results were also confirmed in each cohort. In the subgroup analysis, LDH could distinguish the survival regardless of most established prognostic factors (number and size of CRLM, surgical margin, extrahepatic metastases, CEA, and CA19-9 levels, etc.). Integrating LDH into the Fong score contributed to an improvement in the predictive value.ConclusionOur study implicates serum LDH as a reliable and independent laboratory biomarker to predict the clinical outcome of curative-intent surgery for CRLM. Composite of LDH and Fong score is a potential stratification tool for CRLM resection. Prospective, international studies are needed to validate these results across diverse populations.

Project description:BACKGROUND:BRAF V600E mutations are present in 8%-10% of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and portend poor prognosis. This study investigated the impact of metastasectomy for patients with BRAF V600E mCRC. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS:Using prospective clinical and molecular data, patients with BRAF V600E mCRC were analyzed for clinical characteristics and survival. Statistical analyses utilized the Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS:Fifty-two patients were identified between July 1, 2008, and January 4, 2016. Patient characteristics included median age 65 years, 61% female, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ?1, 71% with right-sided tumors, and 28% with liver-limited metastasis. In the first-line setting, 7% (4/52) received fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI)/bevacizumab (BEV) and 81% were treated with doublet chemotherapy consisting of fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, and BEV. Median overall survival (OS) for all 52 patients was 25 months with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.3 months. With median follow-up of 18.3 months, 21 patients underwent metastasectomy with longer OS (29.1 months vs. 22.7 months, hazard ratio [HR]?=?0.33; confidence interval [CI], 0.12-0.78; p?=?.01) and PFS (13.6 months vs. 6.2 months, HR?=?0.53, CI, 0.28-0.97; p?=?.03) compared with the non-metastasectomy cohort. In multivariate analysis, metastasectomy remained significant for improved survival outcomes (HR?=?0.52; 95% CI, 0.07-1.02; p?=?.02). Median disease-free survival after metastasectomy was 9.7 months (95% CI, 5.5-19.5). Two patients remain disease-free at the time of last follow-up, with one patient without relapse for greater than 2 years (28.9 months). CONCLUSION:Multimodality therapy incorporating metastasectomy for BRAF V600E mCRC should be considered and might be associated with improved overall survival in select patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE:BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) represents an extremely difficult molecular subset of colorectal cancer to treat. To date, this subset remains refractory to standard chemotherapies, prompting extensive clinical investigation regarding novel treatment approaches and targeted modalities. While the use of metastasectomy for expanded RAS wild-type and RAS mutated mCRC has resulted in improved overall survival for select patients, utilization of metastasectomy in patients with BRAF V600E mCRC remains controversial. This article explores the authors' experience with BRAF V600E mCRC to ascertain whether a multidisciplinary approach incorporating metastasectomy for well-selected patients improves overall survival.