Dataset Information

The Transantral Endoscopic Approach: A Portal for Masses of the Inferior Orbit-Improving Surgeons' Experience Through Virtual Endoscopy and Augmented Reality.

ABSTRACT: In the past years, endoscopic techniques have raised an increasing interest to perform minimally invasive accesses to the orbit, resulting in excellent clinical outcomes with inferior morbidities and complication rates. Among endoscopic approaches, the transantral endoscopic approach allows us to create a portal to the orbital floor, representing the most straightforward access to lesions located in the inferior orbital space. However, if endoscopic surgery provides enhanced magnified vision of the anatomy in a bloodless field, then it has several impairments compared with classic open surgery, owing to restricted operative spaces. Virtual surgical planning and anatomical computer-generated models have proved to be of great importance to plan endoscopic surgical approaches, and their role can be widened with the integration of surgical navigation, virtual endoscopy simulation, and augmented reality (AR). This study focuses on the strict conjugation between the technologies that allow the virtualization of surgery in an entirely digital environment, which can be transferred to the patient using intraoperative navigation or to a printed model using AR for pre-surgical analysis. Therefore, the interaction between different software packages and platforms offers a highly predictive preview of the surgical scenario, contributing to increasing orientation, awareness, and effectiveness of maneuvers performed under endoscopic guidance, which can be checked at any time using surgical navigation. In this paper, the authors explore the transantral approach for the excision of masses of the inferior orbital compartment through modern technology. The authors apply this technique for masses located in the inferior orbit and share their clinical results, describing why technological innovation, and, in particular, computer planning, virtual endoscopy, navigation, and AR can contribute to empowering minimally invasive orbital surgery, at the same time offering a valuable and indispensable tool for pre-surgical analysis and training.

SUBMITTER: Tel A

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8419325 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Background:Minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) and endoscopic spine surgery have continually evolving indications in the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spine. Endoscopic spine surgery entails treatment of disc disease, stenosis, spondylolisthesis, radiculopathy, and deformity. MISS involves complex motor skills in regions of variable anatomy. Simulator use has been proposed to aid in training and skill retention, preoperative planning, and intraoperative use. Methods:A systematic review of five databases was performed for publications pertaining to the use of virtual (VR), augmented (AR), and mixed (MR) reality in MISS and spinal endoscopic surgery. Qualitative data analysis was undertaken with focus of study design, quality, and reported outcomes. Study quality was assessed using the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument (MERSQI) score and level of evidence (LoE) by a modified Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine (OCEBM) level for simulation in medicine. Results:Thirty-eight studies were retained for data collection. Studies were of intervention-control, clinical application, and pilot or cross-sectional design. Identified articles illustrated use of VR, AR, and MR in all study designs. Procedures included pedicle cannulation and screw insertion, vertebroplasty, kyphoplasty, percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED), lumbar puncture and facet injection, transvertebral anterior cervical foraminotomy (TVACF) and posterior cervical laminoforaminotomy. Overall MERSQI score was low-to-medium [M =9.71 (SD =2.60); range, 4.5-13.5], and LoE was predominantly low given the number of purely descriptive articles, or low-quality randomized studies. Conclusions:The current scope of VR, AR, and MR surgical simulators in MISS and spinal endoscopic surgery was described. Studies demonstrate improvement in technical skill and patient outcomes in short term follow-up. Despite this, overall study quality and levels of evidence remain low. Cohesive study design and reporting with focus on transfer validity in training scenarios, and patient derived outcome measures in clinical studies are required to further advance the field.

Project description:BACKGROUND:Remote virtual rehabilitation aroused growing interest in the last decades, and its role has gained importance following the recent spread of COVID19 pandemic. The advantages of virtual reality (VR), augmented reality (AR), gamification, and telerehabilitation have been demonstrated in several medical fields. In this review, we searched the literature for studies using these technologies for orthopedic rehabilitation and analyzed studies' quality, type and field of rehabilitation, patients' characteristics, and outcomes to describe the state of the art of VR, AR, gamification, and telerehabilitation for orthopedic rehabilitation. METHODS:A comprehensive search on PubMed, Medline, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Embase databases was conducted. This review was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies published between 2015 and 2020 about remote virtual rehabilitations for orthopedic patients were selected. The Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) and Cochrane Risk-of-Bias assessment tool were used for quality assessment. RESULTS:24 studies (9 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 15 non-randomized studies) and 2472 patients were included. Studies mainly concern telerehabilitation (56%), and to a lesser extent VR (28%), AR (28%), and gamification (16%). Remote virtual technologies were used following knee and hip arthroplasty. The majority of included patients were between 40 and 60 years old and had a university degree. Remote virtual rehabilitation was not inferior to face-to-face therapy, and physical improvements were demonstrated by increased clinical scores. Orthopedic virtual remote rehabilitation decreased costs related to transports, hospitalizations, and readmissions. CONCLUSION:The heterogeneity of included studies prevented a meta-analysis of their results. Age and social context influence adaptability to technology, and this can modify compliance to treatment and outcomes. A good relationship between patient and physiotherapist is essential for treatment compliance and new technologies are useful to maintain clinical interactions remotely. Remote virtual technologies allow the delivery of high-quality care at reduced costs. This is a necessity given the growing demand for orthopedic rehabilitation and increasing costs related to it. Future studies need to develop specific and objective methods to evaluate the clinical quality of new technologies and definitively demonstrate advantages of VR, AR, gamification, and telerehabilitation compared to face-to face orthopedic rehabilitation.

Dataset Information

The Transantral Endoscopic Approach: A Portal for Masses of the Inferior Orbit-Improving Surgeons' Experience Through Virtual Endoscopy and Augmented Reality.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets