Unknown

Dataset Information

0

Comparison of two PCRs for detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans.


ABSTRACT: Two nested PCRs for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans were compared by using a collection of 65 clinical specimens. The first method amplifies the gene coding for 16S rRNA, and the second method amplifies a repetitive DNA sequence. The sensitivities of bacterioscopy, culture, 16S rRNA gene PCR, and repetitive-sequence PCR were 29, 34, 80, and 85%, respectively. Compared to the 16S rRNA gene PCR, the repetitive-sequence PCR was faster, easier to perform, and less expensive.

SUBMITTER: Guimaraes-Peres A 

PROVIDER: S-EPMC84208 | biostudies-literature | 1999 Jan

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

altmetric image

Publications

Comparison of two PCRs for detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans.

Guimaraes-Peres A A   Portaels F F   de Rijk P P   Fissette K K   Pattyn S R SR   van Vooren J J   Fonteyne P P  

Journal of clinical microbiology 19990101 1


Two nested PCRs for the detection of Mycobacterium ulcerans were compared by using a collection of 65 clinical specimens. The first method amplifies the gene coding for 16S rRNA, and the second method amplifies a repetitive DNA sequence. The sensitivities of bacterioscopy, culture, 16S rRNA gene PCR, and repetitive-sequence PCR were 29, 34, 80, and 85%, respectively. Compared to the 16S rRNA gene PCR, the repetitive-sequence PCR was faster, easier to perform, and less expensive. ...[more]

Similar Datasets

| S-EPMC4794205 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC88643 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6373974 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC5009631 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC9294675 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3907311 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC6395692 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC1951036 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC3269429 | biostudies-literature
| S-EPMC2878211 | biostudies-literature