Dataset Information

The change in estimate method for selecting confounders: A simulation study.

ABSTRACT:

Background

The change in estimate is a popular approach for selecting confounders in epidemiology. It is recommended in epidemiologic textbooks and articles over significance test of coefficients, but concerns have been raised concerning its validity. Few simulation studies have been conducted to investigate its performance.

Methods

An extensive simulation study was realized to compare different implementations of the change in estimate method. The implementations were also compared when estimating the association of body mass index with diastolic blood pressure in the PROspective Québec Study on Work and Health.

Results

All methods were susceptible to introduce important bias and to produce confidence intervals that included the true effect much less often than expected in at least some scenarios. Overall mixed results were obtained regarding the accuracy of estimators, as measured by the mean squared error. No implementation adequately differentiated confounders from non-confounders. In the real data analysis, none of the implementation decreased the estimated standard error.

Conclusion

Based on these results, it is questionable whether change in estimate methods are beneficial in general, considering their low ability to improve the precision of estimates without introducing bias and inability to yield valid confidence intervals or to identify true confounders.

SUBMITTER: Talbot D

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8424612 | biostudies-literature | 2021 Sep

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Publications

The change in estimate method for selecting confounders: A simulation study.

Talbot Denis D Diop Awa A Lavigne-Robichaud Mathilde M Brisson Chantal C

Statistical methods in medical research 20210809 9

<h4>Background</h4>The change in estimate is a popular approach for selecting confounders in epidemiology. It is recommended in epidemiologic textbooks and articles over significance test of coefficients, but concerns have been raised concerning its validity. Few simulation studies have been conducted to investigate its performance.<h4>Methods</h4>An extensive simulation study was realized to compare different implementations of the change in estimate method. The implementations were also compar ...[more]

PMID: 34369220

Similar Datasets

Project description:BackgroundControlling unobserved confounding still remains a great challenge in observational studies, and a series of strict assumptions of the existing methods usually may be violated in practice. Therefore, it is urgent to put forward a novel method.MethodsWe are interested in the causal effect of an exposure on the outcome, which is always confounded by unobserved confounding. We show that, the causal effect of an exposure on a continuous or categorical outcome is nonparametrically identified through only two independent or correlated available confounders satisfying a non-linear condition on the exposure. Asymptotic theory and variance estimators are developed for each case. We also discuss an extension for more than two binary confounders.ResultsThe simulations show better estimation performance by our approach in contrast to the traditional regression approach adjusting for observed confounders. A real application is separately applied to assess the effects of Body Mass Index (BMI) on Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP), Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), Fasting Blood Glucose (FBG), Triglyceride (TG), Total Cholesterol (TC), High Density Lipoprotein (HDL) and Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) with individuals in Shandong Province, China. Our results suggest that SBP increased 1.60 (95% CI: 0.99-2.93) mmol/L with per 1- kg/m2 higher BMI and DBP increased 0.37 (95% CI: 0.03-0.76) mmol/L with per 1- kg/m2 higher BMI. Moreover, 1- kg/m2 increase in BMI was causally associated with a 1.61 (95% CI: 0.96-2.97) mmol/L increase in TC, a 1.66 (95% CI: 0.91-55.30) mmol/L increase in TG and a 2.01 (95% CI: 1.09-4.31) mmol/L increase in LDL. However, BMI was not causally associated with HDL with effect value - 0.20 (95% CI: - 1.71-1.44). And, the effect value of FBG per 1- kg/m2 higher BMI was 0.56 (95% CI: - 0.24-2.18).ConclusionsWe propose a novel method to control unobserved confounders through double binary confounders satisfying a non-linear condition on the exposure which is easy to access.

Dataset Information

The change in estimate method for selecting confounders: A simulation study.

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Publications

The change in estimate method for selecting confounders: A simulation study.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets