Dataset Information

Total wrist arthrodesis with and without arthrodesis of the carpoMetacarpal joint (WAWWAM): study protocol.

ABSTRACT:

Background

It is controversial whether or not the carpometacarpal joint (CMCJ) should be included in total wrist arthrodesis (TWA). Complications commonly occur at this site and studies examining its inclusion and exclusion are conflicting. A randomised clinical trial comparing wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ arthrodesis and spanning plate to wrist arthrodesis with CMCJ preservation and non-CMCJ spanning plate has not been performed.

Method

A single centre randomised clinical trial including 120 adults with end-stage isolated wrist arthritis will be performed to compare TWA with and without the CMCJ included in the arthrodesis. The primary outcome is complications in the first post-operative year. Secondary outcomes are Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score, Patient Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and grip strength measured at 1, 2 and 5 years. Late complications, return to work and satisfaction will also be recorded.

Discussion

It is unknown whether the CMCJ should be included in TWA. This trial will contribute to an improved understanding of optimal management of the CMCJ in total wrist arthrodesis.

Trial registration

This trial was prospectively registered with the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry with identifying number ACTRN12621000169842 on the 16th February 2021. WHO: U1111-12626523.

Anzctr

ACTRN12621000169842.

SUBMITTER: Owen DH

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8425134 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:Treatment of severely destroyed rheumatoid wrists with total wrist arthroplasty or total wrist arthrodesis relies on patient and surgeon preferences rather than rigorous prospective outcomes data. The purpose of this study is to develop a decision analytic model of arthroplasty and arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using utility values obtained from a random sample of hand surgeons.A utility survey using a time trade-off design was administered to 175 members of the American Society for Surgery of the Hand. Based on the results of the survey, the utility values that surgeons assign to health states associated with arthroplasty and arthrodesis and their complications were calculated. By combining utility values with complication rates in the published literature, we developed a decision tree to calculate the expected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each procedure compared to living with a painful RA wrist.Based on surgeon preferences, living for 30 years with a painful, poorly functioning RA wrist (utility = 0.54) is associated with 16.2 QALYs. Treatment with arthroplasty (utility = 0.85) is associated with 25.5 QALYs, a gain of 9.3 QALYs over nonsurgical management. Arthrodesis (utility = 0.82) is associated with 24.6 QALYs, a gain of 8.4 QALYs over nonsurgical management. Arthroplasty is associated with a small incremental increase in QALYs (0.9) compared to arthrodesis.Based on utility scores, hand surgeons feel that living with a painful, poorly functioning RA wrist for 30 years is worth approximately half as many years with a painless, well-functioning wrist. The outcomes for arthroplasty and arthrodesis are valued more than nonsurgical management. On the basis of its higher expected gain in QALYs, arthroplasty should be the preferred treatment. The minimal increase in utility for arthroplasty over arthrodesis suggests however, that surgeons do not view arthroplasty as superior to arthrodesis.Economic and decision analysis IV.