Dataset Information

Converting single nucleotide variants between genome builds: from cautionary tale to solution.

ABSTRACT: Next-generation sequencing studies are dependent on a high-quality reference genome for single nucleotide variant (SNV) calling. Although the two most recent builds of the human genome are widely used, position information is typically not directly comparable between them. Re-alignment gives the most accurate position information, but this procedure is often computationally expensive, and therefore, tools such as liftOver and CrossMap are used to convert data from one build to another. However, the positions of converted SNVs do not always match SNVs derived from aligned data, and in some instances, SNVs are known to change chromosome when converted. This is a significant problem when compiling sequencing resources or comparing results across studies. Here, we describe a novel algorithm to identify positions that are unstable when converting between human genome reference builds. These positions are detected independent of the conversion tools and are determined by the chain files, which provide a mapping of contiguous positions from one build to another. We also provide the list of unstable positions for converting between the two most commonly used builds GRCh37 and GRCh38. Pre-excluding SNVs at these positions, prior to conversion, results in SNVs that are stable to conversion. This simple procedure gives the same final list of stable SNVs as applying the algorithm and subsequently removing variants at unstable positions. This work highlights the care that must be taken when converting SNVs between genome builds and provides a simple method for ensuring higher confidence converted data. Unstable positions and algorithm code, available at https://github.com/cathaloruaidh/genomeBuildConversion.

SUBMITTER: Ormond C

PROVIDER: S-EPMC8425424 | biostudies-literature |

REPOSITORIES: biostudies-literature

ACCESS DATA

Similar Datasets

Project description:FURIN is a pro-protein convertase previously shown to be important for placental syncytialisation (Zhou et al. [1]), a process of cell fusion whereby placental cytotrophoblast cells fuse to form a multinucleated syncytium. This finding has been broadly accepted however, we have evidence suggesting the contrary. Spontaneously syncytialising term primary human trophoblast cells and BeWo choriocarcinoma cells were treated with either FURIN siRNA or negative control siRNA or the protease inhibitor, DEC-RVKR-CMK, or vehicle. Cells were then left to either spontaneously syncytialise (primary trophoblasts) or were induced to syncytialise with forskolin (BeWo). Effects on syncytialisation were measured by determining human chorionic gonadotrophin secretion and E-cadherin protein levels. We showed that FURIN is not important for syncytialisation in either cell type. However, in primary trophoblasts another protease also inhibited by DEC-RVKR-CMK, may be involved. Our results directly contrast with those published by Zhou et al. Zhou et al. however, used first trimester villous explants to study syncytialisation, and we used term primary trophoblasts. Therefore, we suggest that FURIN may be involved in syncytialisation of first trimester trophoblasts, but not term trophoblasts. What is more concerning is that our results using BeWo cells do not agree with their results, even though for the most part, we used the same experimental design. It is unclear why these experiments yielded different results, however we wanted to draw attention to simple differences in measuring syncytialisation or flaws in method reporting (including omission of cell line source and passage numbers, siRNA concentration and protein molecular weights) and choice of immunoblot loading controls, that could impact on experimental outcomes. Our study shows that careful reporting of methods by authors and thorough scrutiny by referees are vital. Furthermore, a universal benchmark for measuring syncytialisation is required so that various studies of syncytialisation can be validated.

Project description:Food security is a multi-dimensional concept that requires multiple indicators to measure it correctly; however, single food security indicators are often used individually or interchangeably. The misinterpretation of individual food security indicators can have important implications for policy design and implementation. The general objective of this paper is to show the discrepancies that may arise when using two different food security indicators that operate in the same dimension of the food security concept and yield the same outcome (food security status of the household) in three of the scenarios that they might be used: (1) for measuring the prevalence of food insecurity, (2) for understanding its drivers, and (3) for estimating the potential impact of a policy. The specific objectives of this paper are (1) to measure and compare the prevalence of food insecurity in a country using the Latin America Food Security Scale (ELCSA, by its acronym in Spanish) and the household undernourishment indicator, (2) to compare the factors associated with households' food security status using the two indicators, and (3) to assess the potential use of the two indicators for ex ante policy analysis. Data for the study comes from the 2011 Survey of Living Standards from Guatemala, which collected all the data for estimating the ELCSA and the household level data required for calculating the household undernourishment indicator. Our results indicate considerable differences in the estimated prevalence of food insecurity at the national and regional levels using the two alternative indicators, with ELCSA resulting in higher estimates. Logistic regression models estimated to assess and identify household food insecurity drivers also found large differences in both the direction and magnitude of factors affecting food insecurity using the alternative food security indicators. Finally, the magnitude of the simulated impact of a cash transfer policy varied depending on the food indicator used.

Dataset Information

Converting single nucleotide variants between genome builds: from cautionary tale to solution.

Similar Datasets

OmicsDI is part of the ELIXIR infrastructure

Tweets